Now that everyone who were doom posting shits all of last week to yesterday, maybe all the tourists are gone. Back to the ground. GM.

Channel
Shynobi’s Gamble Plays
@ShynobiGamblePlays
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27,295subscribers
-8,030 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002137038937 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ShynobiGamblePlays |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ShynobiGamblePlays |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 27,295 | -461 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:32 | 27,756 | -58 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:43 | 27,814 | -31 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 27,845 | -40 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 27,885 | -70 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 27,955 | -44 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 27,999 | -232 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 28,231 | -59 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 28,290 | -55 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 28,345 | -509 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 28,854 | -360 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 29,214 | -314 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 29,528 | -203 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 29,731 | -74 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 29,805 | -53 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 29,858 | -520 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 30,378 | -1,713 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 32,091 | -367 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 32,458 | -134 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 32,592 | first reading |
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.19%
- avg views ÷ 27,295 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,510
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (18 June 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 25,090 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 12:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
https://fxtwitter.com/ElonRWA/status/1912202558254281143
I've bought some into $ELONRWA https://dexscreener.com/base/0xd56f086e7b796b313d49f2bc926fac4bdd2a2b0b
Video, posted without a caption
$CATE Cracking up to new ATH’s levels, Believers will win again, it comes in cycles, as always. https://dexscreener.com/solana/HMzvsEEmtzHhvZNw9uwbaG85HCTmFnkbhzUx16cy7ca3 https://fxtwitter.com/pumpfun/status/2090885144135573517 Been awhile since seen strong CTO’s with a super strong Communities showing up like these, you either see it or you dont.
ETH
$YEE looking good here cranking up to the ATH levels pretty impressive tbh, undervalued yee haw. https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xbc7ce7b6b5437d7d715fbb1cc7b4ec12399c5516 Been awhile since seen strong CTO’s with a super strong Communities showing up on ETH like these.
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
GMGM feels good, Gneiro woof stays up.
Holy FUCK DREAMERS/BELIEVERS are paid again. Well done $CATE the sister of doge — 100x since the tweet. https://x.com/shynobikusama/status/2084264066231816648
Gm, its just another GOOD day in the good bear camp.
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @ShynobiGamblePlays. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shynobi’s Gamble Plays” (@ShynobiGamblePlays), 27,295 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShynobiGamblePlays.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.