Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Shushy solo

Channel

Shushy solo

@Shushyousolo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002290431682
TypeChannel
Username@Shushyousolo
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 18 February 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Shushyousolo

Growth

413 Aug 2026, 12:01 — 4 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 13:05 — 4 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 12:0113 Aug 2026, 13:05
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:054no change
13 Aug 2026, 12:014first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 18 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
39s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥375.0%
🤷‍♀125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2025 to 20 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Feb 2025, 10:56 UTC30 viewsread 13 August 2026

https://t.me/huunjs я нахожусь в этой группе за ниннин

19 Feb 2025, 10:47 UTC30 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

💒 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Ты жената с кем нибудь? Из компании ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

19 Feb 2025, 10:04 UTC17 viewsread 13 August 2026

Быстро пишем в комментариях своё мнение

19 Feb 2025, 08:06 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Друзья почему нет никакого актива и поддержки?

🤷‍♀1

19 Feb 2025, 07:41 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

𝙉𝙚𝙬 𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙨𝙝𝙪𝙨𝙝𝙮 𝙏𝙞𝙠 𝙩𝙤𝙠 𝙨𝙤𝙡𝙤 𝙨𝙝𝙪𝙨𝙝𝙮 2000❤️ 1000💬

🔥1

19 Feb 2025, 06:59 UTC136 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Я поздравляю Сбор ои с 300 под. Желаю вам удачи и больше успехов!! Я знаю что вы нужны ои и будете ещё в этом направлении наверно долго. Я верю у вас всё получится. От шиху🍒

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Shushyousolo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,331,432 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shushy solo” (@Shushyousolo), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shushyousolo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.