Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Shrebobo Cooks

Channel

Shrebobo Cooks

@Shrebobo_Cooks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,081subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002365923013
TypeChannel
Username@Shrebobo_Cooks
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Shrebobo_Cooks

Growth

1,0811,1011,0917 August 2026 — 1,101 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,101 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,099 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,097 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,093 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,092 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,088 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,085 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,081 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 30 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,078–1,104 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 23:591,081-4
2 Sept 2026, 18:331,085-3
24 Aug 2026, 20:231,088-4
21 Aug 2026, 01:281,092-1
17 Aug 2026, 21:551,093-4
14 Aug 2026, 22:141,097-2
11 Aug 2026, 19:221,099-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:041,101no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:581,101first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

158 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9761.4%
🔥2515.8%
🫡148.86%
👍85.06%
53.16%
❤‍🔥42.53%
👌21.27%
🥰21.27%
😢10.633%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Shrebobo_Cooks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 January 2026 to 1 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2026, 20:09 UTC409 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Quick update. With everything I'm juggling right now - active positions across multiple markets, building out new strategies on perps and stocks, and the rest of my life outside the charts - I can no longer keep creating original content for multiple platforms at once. There's only so many hours in a day. I could hire someone to ghostwrite for me. A lot of accounts do it. But that goes against everything I stand fo

16🫡6🔥1😢1

1 Feb 2026, 21:08 UTC≈1,290 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

January was a total battlefield. ⚔️ We watched the majors nuking 20% in weeks, making this one of the hardest trading environments. But looking back at the data, we held our ground better than expected. Ending the month with a 62% win rate. In a month this bloody? I’ll take that as a win. Winners: $RAM, $MINER, and $LUMEN (still looking primed). Lost on some coins like $SOL, $Shitcoin and others. More losses tha

8🔥6

29 Jan 2026, 19:00 UTC789 viewsread 8 August 2026

Join live session where we will talk about current price action and how to survive this bear market https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1BdGYZrdLdLJX

26 Jan 2026, 18:02 UTC781 viewsread 8 August 2026

Join Live and let's discuss some of the important coins as $SPSC, $LUMEN, $PENGUIN and more Requests are welcome https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1OdKrOzVbDPGX

22 Jan 2026, 18:03 UTC779 viewsread 8 August 2026

Join live and let's discuss various meme coins prices including $Baby $Ram $RALPH and more https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1DXxyWDdolbGM

21 Jan 2026, 18:53 UTC675 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I published a super insightful article about market structure. Make sure to check it out cause I am sure you will learn something new there. Your love is very much appreciated cause it took me all day to write it :D https://x.com/shrebobo/status/2014048412447003077?s=20

10🫡2

20 Jan 2026, 13:14 UTC679 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Nice rejection on $BTC from the FVG resistance. My next target is 89k and continue the bearish MS

🫡3

19 Jan 2026, 19:01 UTC566 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Join the live stream! https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1YpKkkZANWNKj

🔥2

18 Jan 2026, 19:15 UTC574 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Macro update on $BTC Bitcoin has hit the weekly FVG about which I have been talking for a long time. This is a major resistance and the rejection from this level is very likely to occur if the MS don't want to change (continue bearish MS) I am positioning myself accordingly and don't really think that it will go to new ATH soon. I am still convinced that we are in bear market. What does that mean to us? • Take pr

👍5🔥31

15 Jan 2026, 19:02 UTC490 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I will be covering $LUMEN, $BABY, $ROCK, $KERMIT, $67, $BTC and more... Open for your requests https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1dRJZaNZLqNGB

1🔥1🫡1

13 Jan 2026, 17:15 UTC584 views36 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Oh shit I missed the cool number. Thanks everyone who’s with me and is supporting my work. I am super happy to have everyone of you here and the fact that we are here likeminded (not gamblers, right?) makes me super excited cause we might become one of the most profitable traders in this space! I have crazy ideas in my mind for 2026 so please bear with me and let’s continue crushing 🫡

28🔥7🥰1

12 Jan 2026, 20:56 UTC561 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

It's not often that I recommend you trading tools but this is a legendary one. We are coming back to the roots and it's @TrojanOnSolana They have launched a new and upgraded trading terminal with unique features: • 45% cashback • Really fast fills • DCA orders • USD1 (stable coin) or SOL currency trading • Daily Free SOL and $50 sign up bonus The best part? CONFIRMED airdrop and they ain't lying like the other pla

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Shrebobo_Cooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shrebobo Cooks” (@Shrebobo_Cooks), 1,081 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shrebobo_Cooks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.