Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
𝑨𝒄𝒕.. 𝑵𝒂𝒎𝒆 𝒊𝒔.. 𝑺𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒚𝒆𝒏𝒈
@ShinyengRS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003329446777 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ShinyengRS |
| Description | Art -> @evashpich |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ShinyengRS |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 23 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 23 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 80.9%
- avg views ÷ 23 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 18.6
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 25.5%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 335 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 2
- Links
- 7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
37 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👾 | 16 | 43.2% | |
| 🆒 | 11 | 29.7% | |
| 🕊 | 10 | 27.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Act 15 Новые вести. -> Ну что ж . Доброго вечера . Мне нужно извиниться за пропажу , так ведь ? Не каждый день я могу пропасть на такой долгий срок . Появились трудности , с которыми я , на данный момент , смогла справиться . Так что сейчас мне будет проще и смогу писать сюда чаще . Что именно у меня случилось ? Как бы объяснить . . -> Я перешла в другой театр . Это было сложным решением для меня . Мне было тяжело …
Sticker, posted without a caption
#𝐔𝗇𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍 🤩 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝑒𝗿𝘀𝗲 𝑠𝗶𝗱𝗲 🔤 𝒄𝒂𝒏 𝓼𝒆𝒆 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝒂𝒈𝓪𝒊𝒏🔤 ׄ ︶ㅤࣦ ⃟🤩 Д𝐲ш𝐚 вд𝐨в𝐨ль 𝐨тд𝐨𝐱н𝐲л𝐚 , в𝐨𝐜𝐜т𝐚н𝐨вил𝐚 𝐜в𝐨и 𝐜илы и г𝐨т𝐨ва п𝐩𝐨д𝐨лжить в𝐞𝐜ти 𝐤𝐚н𝐚л! ㅤׄ ⃨⏜᷼ 🌟🌟 𝓽 . 𝗆𝖾 ⋮ Шиньэн ⌢ Не пропустите самые свежие новости от данного саппорта ‼️
Sticker, posted without a caption
ᅠᅠ #𝐑𝖾𝗌𝗍 🤩 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝑒𝗿𝘀𝗲 𝑠𝗶𝗱𝗲 🔤𝒉𝒆 𝓻𝒆𝒇𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒆 𝓲𝓼 𝒔𝒐 𝐛𝐥𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐲 。。。 ⃝⃘🤩 ֵ 𝐊𝐚ж𝐞т𝐜я 𝐤𝐨м𝐲-т𝐨 𝐜𝐩𝐨чн𝐨 п𝐨н𝐚д𝐨бил𝐜я м𝐚-𝐚-𝐚л𝐞нь𝐤ий 𝐨тп𝐲𝐜𝐤 д𝐨 𝓞𝟵.𝓞𝟴❗️ ㅤׄ ⏜᷼💤 𝓽 . 𝗆𝖾 ⋮ Шиньэн Просьба не беспокоить и не отписываться от саппорта🤩
Sticker, posted without a caption
Act 14. Шиньэн делиться сегодняшней прогулкой. -> Вечера вам . Хотелось написать пораньше , но не вышло . Моя знакомая снова решила позвать меня на прогулку , а отказать я не смогла . Да , сегодня гуляла . Недолго , всего пару часов . В такую жару погулять нормально не выйдет . Надень что угодно , но это тебе не поможет . Казалось бы , прогуляться в майке и шортах , что тут такого ? Знакомая почти всю прогулку проси…
👾3🕊2🆒2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Act 13 В котором девушка думает о своих чувствах. -> Не дано мне понять и ощутить эту теплоту внутри . . Ощущение , будто не создана я для любви . Так может сказать каждый , абсолютно каждый . Вот только те , кто действительно хочет этого , обязательно обретут счастье , свободу . А я . . Я запуталась . Может быть , мне не хочется совмещать будущую карьеру и отношения . Может , я еще не до конца выросла и лучше повр…
👾3🕊2🆒2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Act 2.1 Фото. -> Итак . Хочу представить вам свою новую гостью - Чернику . Большего я не смогла придумать , так уж вышло . . Она у меня третий день , уже успела осмотреть весь дом и выбрать место для сна . Странно , но ей приглянулся мой шкаф с одеждой . Просто под вешалкой у меня лежат подушки , а они весьма мягкие . Увидела я её там случайно , когда пошла за одеждой для репетиции . Она просто смотрела на меня свои…
👾3🕊3🆒2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ShinyengRS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,057,302 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑨𝒄𝒕.. 𝑵𝒂𝒎𝒆 𝒊𝒔.. 𝑺𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒚𝒆𝒏𝒈” (@ShinyengRS), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShinyengRS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.