https://telegra.ph/福田抠门小财迷-10-29

Channel
ShenzhenHot
@ShenzhenHot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
535subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001154801928 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ShenzhenHot |
| Created | Between 1 February 2019 and 2 February 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ShenzhenHot |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:24 | 535 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 537 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 540 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 544 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 548 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 549 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 549 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 2 February 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 October 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
https://telegra.ph/深圳热第2期罗湖梦涵-10-29
https://telegra.ph/深圳热第1期-福田西丽小小-10-29
https://telegra.ph/深圳热第0期-10-29
从经济学来讲,没有中间商挣差价这个论点有时候是不对的。性服务的市场是一个柠檬市场,中间商可以提供很好的信息交换的价值。问题是,现在大部分的中介都是坑爹中介,手续费比嫖资还高。但还是有一些好的中介,第一价格合理,400到600的口粮价格而不是4位数的坑冤大头价格,第二见面给钱,不合适可以转身就走。这样的中介需要珍惜一下,要不都被劣币驱逐良币了 @aammppqq
最近比较热闹的深圳群
@szyhy0
Photo, posted without a caption
没体验过抱起来的体位的可以去体验一下,绝对轻松抱起来
这个妹子身体太小了,不是看脸,还以为自己犯罪了 @Xiaoxiaosf
人老了性欲就消退了,真是老来方知精来贵
难得的好频道,大家可以多看看顶级的情色,提高品味
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ShenzhenHot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ShenzhenHot named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ShenzhenHot” (@ShenzhenHot), 535 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShenzhenHot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.