北京的男男女女为什么只谈恋爱不结婚?哈哈,真绝了。
Channel
破茧日报
@ShareInfoDaily
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,783subscribers
-73 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001348178546 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ShareInfoDaily |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ShareInfoDaily |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:58 | 2,783 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:48 | 2,789 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 2,792 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:09 | 2,795 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 2,799 | -1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:59 | 2,800 | -14 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 03:50 | 2,814 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 02:19 | 2,817 | -6 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 14:59 | 2,823 | -4 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 11:39 | 2,827 | -11 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 2,838 | -15 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 2,853 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 2,859 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 2,860 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 2,862 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 2,867 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 2,874 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 2,876 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 2,878 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 2,880 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 7 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
嗐,等下班,简单聊聊做App这事,或者说App vs 网页,又或者说,现在独立做App还有没有搞头。 虽然我做过App,从0到1,甚至谷歌、苹果上架都做过,但没独立开发,可能以下观点没说服力,姑且一听。 有一个名词叫 『不公平优势』或者说不正当优势,我觉得要做App,也要用起这个理论。你开发的App要天然,还没开始之前就要具备网页没有的能力,往这个思路去做,我觉得才有搞头。 比如说:短信、通话、拍照、视频、音频、蓝牙等等,你的构思,你的idea要搭建这些网页没有的能力。还想做常规的独立开发三件套,那我干嘛不用网页,干嘛不用之前存在的App,你又有什么独特优势呢。总觉得解决了啥痛点问题就有搞头,但问题客户迁移成本大。或者,你这解决的痛点方案,有啥门槛,其他App干嘛不能抄袭、借鉴加进去。 下班下班。
给自己做了个小工具,主要用来记录【进度】。有两种,一个是打卡习惯,比如:做俯卧撑、背单词、冥想等,记录数值,统计。还有个是设定目标,实现目标,记录进度。比如学习英语1000小时,读50本书等等。 工作已经开发App腻了,实在讨厌再用App实现。这工具用网页做的,在浏览器发送到桌面,就和App差不多使用。数据全部保存在设备本地,放心用就是。只有需要在多个设备同步数据,比如手机、电脑,其他手机同步记录,才需要谷歌授权登录。 我一直想要这样一个工具记录,开发之前,找了好几个App,但都不太满意。有的设计不喜欢、功能太重了、复杂、收费。所以决定自己开发个,因为我自己也要长期使用,所以这工具会一直维护下去。 https://goal.guozh.net
生小孩的意义,转自 53 岁深圳不婚不育女性自述
我说为啥别人拍出来照片那么好看,原来他们还调色了。 对自己照片总结,我日常照片大致可以分成这两个大块,每个大块分为5类。再排列组合,其实总共25个搭配。 和各家AI聊了3个多小时,我本意是想让AI给我25个调色参数公式,最后发现把AI也搞迷糊了,有点幻觉。只能缩短区间,让它给我5个万能公式,让照片变『好看』,或者有『高级感』,很出片的万能公式。 然后保存到备忘录,再截图收藏,然后对这张照片对照参数设置。这样,当以后要处理拍摄的照片,先判断,再找分类,只要拷贝对应截图的参数设置,再一键应用就行了。 感觉这方案还行,但都是自己琢磨的,可能还有点小问题,以后碰到再说吧。 有需要的自取,只要保存我的截图到相册,然后按照图片里参数设置,再拷贝编辑点,应用到照片就行了。就不用保存到备忘录了。 5个光线 晴天 阴天雨天 室内暖光 窗边自然光 夜晚 5个主体 人像 美食 风景 建筑 植物 / 静物
YouTube Premium 的家庭车,我自己弄的,纯自用,走日本区价格。还剩两个车位,一个车位一个月20块,一次性交半年120块。日本的还是挺稳的,应该没啥事,而且这是我自己信用卡,一般来说问题不大。万一被停用了,到时候按剩余时间退。有需要的私聊我。
很多时候,研究并严格执行不做什么的行为清单,比研究做什么的重要性要高几个数量级,而且也简单很多。硅谷王川的这两套不做清单非常具有借鉴意义。
笑死,莫名戳到我笑点了😄
我的 2025 年个人总结,里面分享了两个我今年的最大收获,甘氨酸镁+记日记。简单聊了下我记日记的方案、逻辑。还有几个适合学英语的入门频道,每个频道至少刷了 50 个视频,确实觉得不错才分享出来,写了详细推荐原因。
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @ShareInfoDaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“破茧日报” (@ShareInfoDaily), 2,783 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShareInfoDaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.