Скучали? Стоит вернуться? 🤭
- Возвращайтесь скорее!🥰58%
- Да и без вас нормально! 😁42%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👎44💘19❤1

Channel
@ShameHRRU
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,667subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 26 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001947204224 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ShameHRRU |
| Description | SHAME HR🫦 • Горячие новости, конкурсы, интервью, скандалы - всё это вы увидите здесь!💓 • Реклама: https://t.me/+1SjDb59Z1vE3NTIy • В конце каждого поста есть БОТ, там вы можете анонимно поделиться информацией |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ShameHRRU |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 1,667 | no change |
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:47 | 1,667 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
351 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 67 | 19.1% | |
| 👎 | 57 | 16.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 48 | 13.7% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 10.3% | |
| 💋 | 35 | 9.97% | |
| 💯 | 35 | 9.97% | |
| 🥰 | 29 | 8.26% | |
| 💘 | 23 | 6.55% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 3.99% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 1.14% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.285% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.285% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.285% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 351 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 28 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ShameHRRU. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 January 2026 to 28 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 28 March 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Скучали? Стоит вернуться? 🤭
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👎44💘19❤1
🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Настюша @nespils, с днём рождения, кошка! 🐈⬛ Мы безумно благодарны тебе за всё эти годы, ты можешь гордиться своим детищем, своей администрацией и своими чудесными подписчиками-шеймерами! Без тебя всего этого не было бы. Не было бы нас! 🦋 Сияй в этот день, сияй всегда! Делись с людьми своей прекрасной улыбкой, искренним кар-карным смехом, отличным чувством юмора и самое главное, - искренностью. Остава…
🥰5❤🔥3💋3❤1
ПОМОЩЬ ЛЮБИМОМУ? НЕТ, НАЕБАЛОВО В ЛИЦО 💞 Любовь — самое прекрасное чувство, как считают некоторые. Благодаря любви начинаются отношения, заводятся семьи. Но не всегда отношения происходят в реальной жизни. Иногда это бывают отношения по интернету. Их главная опасность — ложь, что может быть бесконтрольной, и о которой можно даже не узнать. Наша сегодняшняя героиня стала жертвой таких отношений. 💐 Сегодня речь пойде…
💯26💋14❤5🎉1🤣1
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Дорогая и бесконечно ценимая Полина @PO.LLi! 🎀 Сегодня самый лучший день, ведь родилась ты! С Днём Рождения, дорогая ! Ты — не просто менеджер нашего канала, ты его душа, его опора и его внутренний свет. За кадром остаётся огромное количество твоего труда, заботы и внимания к деталям, благодаря которым всё работает чётко и красиво.🩷 Спасибо тебе за терпение, мудрость и умение слышать каждого. За то, к…
❤7💋4❤🔥3
🌷 Дорогие Шеймеры, с днём Святого Валентина! 🌷 Сегодня день, когда в био внезапно появляются инициалы, закрытые комнаты становятся переполненными, а «мы не общаемся» перестаёт работать уже к вечеру. 🤩 Кому-то подарят валентинки, кому-то — обещания, а кому-то — новый повод проверить, кто ещё стоит в закрепе. 🎀 Если вас пока не отметили в профиле — не спешите грустить, ведь самые интересные признания приходят после …
❤🔥12🥰5💋4❤1
Каждый четверг даёт шанс выбрать что-то своё, поэтому наша любимая рубрика «Выбери своё» снова идёт в ход. 😊 Сегодня мы посмотрим, на что вы готовы ради зелёных бумажек. 💕 Готовы ли вы удалить игру? Сделать то, чего раньше не делали? А может, убрать из игры что-то действительно важное для вас, то, с чем вы уже почти сроднились? ❤️ И всё это — всего лишь за зелёные бумажки. Звучит просто, но не спешите с выводами. …
❤🔥5🥰3💘2❤1
Сегодня вторник — а это значит, что мы начинаем наш интерактив ‼️ Каждый в своей жизни сталкивался с загадками, даже если делал вид, что «ну это слишком легко». Сегодня как раз тот самый день, чтобы проверить себя и свою смекалку 🔥 Мы будем отгадывать загадки и получать за это золото. Да-да, настоящее виртуальное золото, которое греет душу и поднимает настроение. Вроде бы легко, да? 😉 Так что собираемся с мыслями,…
ЖЕСТОКАЯ МРАЗЬ В ОВЕЧЕЙ ШКУРЕ 🎀 Недавно в Highrise-комьюнити всплыло то, что лучше бы оставалось за кадром. 💗 Войсы, переписки и личные истории запустили новый громкий скандал вокруг TikTok-блогера. И на этот раз обсуждают не контент — а реальное поведение. 🎱 В связи с тем, что пост вышел довольно объемным, мы опубликовали его ➡️ВОТ ТУТ После прочтения решать Вам! 💋 или 💯 , а может 💓 Есть информация? Пиши в БОТ …
❤🔥10💯9💋3💘2❤1🔥1
🔥🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🔥 Соскучились по скидкам? Тогда у нас для вас отличные новости! ☑️ Шейм дарит скидку 20% на рекламу! (Не включая бич пакета) Хочешь увидеть свою рекламу на нашем канале и привлечь новую аудиторию? ☑️ У тебя есть свой канал, чат продаж или личная комната в игре? Самое время заявить о себе! ☑️ Мы даём возможность разместить рекламу со скидкой 20% — не упусти шанс! Количество мест ограничено, обращайтесь к @n…
🥰8❤🔥5👍5❤1🍓1
СЛИВ СОЧНЫХ ПОПОК *жми сюда* ⬆️ Раз уж вы всё-таки нажали, маленькие извращенцы — значит, вам тоже интересно, как в Highrise самые безобидные ивенты умеют внезапно превращаться в шоу с элементами абсурда. 🐷 История начинается максимально спокойно. Информатор заходит на конкурс красоты просто позависать, посмотреть чем все закончится, отдохнуть и прекрасно провести время. Атмосфера царила вроде бы нейтральная: участ…
💔14❤8🔥3
💞💞💞💞💞💞💞💞💞💞💞 Этот пост для самой прекрасной мамы и прекрасного человека - @sansarrraa 💞 Наша хорошая и любимая Машенька! ‼️ От всей нашей семьи Шейма поздравим тебя с днём рождения! Мы бесконечно благодарны судьбе за то, что ты есть в нашем канале. Желаем тебе, чтобы исполнились все мечты — от самой маленькой до самой большой. 🎀 Без тебя никогда не проходят мимо текста, каждый раз ты пишешь их с любовью и уверенно…
❤8
ТЫ СКАЗАЛ, ЧТО ЭТО НАВСЕГДА, А ВЫШЛО — КАК ВСЕГДА! 😀 Дорогие друзья, как часто вы покупаете вип в тех или иных комнатах? Случалось ли так, что вы платили за одно, а получали совсем другое? Сегодня мы об этом и поговорим. 👍 Пострадавший купил вип в достаточно популярной комнате «Витрины продаж». В боте было написано, что якобы за 100 голд вы получаете вип навсегда. Ранее данной функции не было, но как только у комна…
👍28👎12❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ShameHRRU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Скучали? Стоит вернуться? 🤭
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 28 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ShameHRRU named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SHAME HR” (@ShameHRRU), 1,667 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShameHRRU.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.