Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 63 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 114–132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Oct 2026, 10:37
116
-1
29 Sept 2026, 16:36
117
-6
9 Sept 2026, 00:38
123
-4
30 Aug 2026, 23:33
127
-1
24 Aug 2026, 12:57
128
-1
17 Aug 2026, 13:23
129
-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:15
130
no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:00
130
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 34s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
9
34.6%
custom 5283002454902855600
8
30.8%
custom 5264932891833438563
7
26.9%
💋
2
7.69%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
🤍Здравствуйте! Любите творчество? Хотели бы увидеть что-то новенькой ❓
🤩🤩🎨🎨🤩🤩🤩🤩😔🤩🌟
❤️Тогда пожалуйста заходите ко мне, я новичок в этом деле, готов радовать вас видео и своими рисунками 🤩
😀😀😀😀😀💀😀😀😀😀😀
🌟:: А хотели заказать у меня арт? Тогда тоже прошу! Цены у меня недорогие, тем более бонус для первых покупателей рисую только бесплатно! Но за отзыв.
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
🤩 Прайс ,,, Формат
🤩Вп-пост (0+/…
ЧТО 👀👀это👀👀же👀👀редизайн👀👀на 👀👀Голден👀👀Честер 👀👀куки👀👀оо👀👀да вы👀👀что👀👀
Ладно, я решилась сделать редизайн, сделала мягкие тона и в целом изменила её, да, угу
👁️🗨️Спасибо за тейк! Съесть-❤️🥹
Неанон Забава
🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹
🥹#тейк @Shadowcheese_bot🥹
Я на планшете полный арт по ним наверное сделаю😛
Канонн🌷
👁️🗨️Спасибо за тейк! Можно я скушаю ваш арт пж🥹
Неанон Оми
🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹
🥹#тейк @Shadowcheese_bot🥹
custom 52649328918334385636❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Shadowcheese_confa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы будете сильно против если я буду выкладывать не только шип шедоу милка и голден чиз, но и их по отдельности?
Сильно против12%
Не против, хочу чтобы кф жил76%
Сомневаюсь, но думаю можно попробовать12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Shadowcheese_confa named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@info_casper named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𐍃ɦᥲɗ᧐ᥕ𑀝ɦᥱᥱsᥱ ᥴ᧐ᥒfᥱssi᧐ᥒ!” (@Shadowcheese_confa), 116 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shadowcheese_confa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
