3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,841–1,856 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 06:17
1,854
+11
6 Aug 2026, 23:38
1,843
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:03
1,843
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
68.2%
avg views ÷ 1,854 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,260
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (25 June 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
16,442
Reactions total
1,298
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,892 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 4936067572396197013
829
43.8%
👍
461
24.4%
❤
410
21.7%
🤬
91
4.81%
🔥
79
4.18%
👎
22
1.16%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,892reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
53
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 20 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Shabkhwan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
اگر یک درس و فقط یک درس میبایست از «روشنفکرانِ دورهٔ بیداری» آموخته باشیم این است که مدارا و ائتلاف با نهادِ آخوند دیر یا زود منجر به ازدسترفتنِ تمامِ دستاوردهای ملّی و تجددخواهانه میشود. هرگاه که اسلامیّات را دیدید که در زرورقِ محبوبِ روزگار بستهبندی میشود، چشمپوشی نکنید. اینها بیش از اسلامیّاتِ آشکار خطرناک و ویرانگر است. نهادِ آخوند و تشکیلاتِ شیعهگری نمیتواند و نباید لحظهای فرصت بیابد که عنعنات و اصولِ ع…
راستِ اسلامی همانقدر به لیبرالیسم ربط دارد که چپِ اسلامی. میبینید که چطور در لفافهٔ یک «لعنت» دقیقاً همان موضعِ قرونوسطاییِ رژیم دربارهٔ زن و خودبنیادیِ انسان و اقتصاد بازتولید میشودـــــگیرم گوینده خود را مخالفِ رژیم بداند. لیبرالیسم از جایی آغاز میشود که این اسلامیّاتِ عفونی تمام میشود.
@Shabkhwan
پنجاهفتیها به روی خودشان نمیآورند، ولی بیش از خودِ رژیم چشمِ امیدشان به استقامتِ دستگاهِ سرکوب است. یگانهای سرکوب آخرین دیوارِ محافظت از عفونتِ پنجاهوهفتند. نابودیِ رژیم نه با نابودیِ ایران، که با نابودیِ تمامیتِ ۵۷ گره خورده است.
[...]
روندِ واکنشِ نیروها و رسانههای چپِ اسپانیا به هجومِ بزرگِ مسلمانانِ مراکشی به سئوتا:
۱. کمابیش هزاروپانصد نفر خودشان را به سواحلِ سئوتا رساندند.
۲. دستکم ۶۰هزار نفر به سئوتا رسیدهاند (بعد از وایرالشدنِ تصاویرِ دهها هزار مهاجم).
۳. خانوادهها با تحملِ سختیِ فراوان توانستهاند به سئوتا برسند. زنان و کودکان بسیارند.
۴. خیلی از آنها قصد دارند از فردا به مراکش برگردند. نگران نباشید (بعد از اینکه حداکثر چندده زن در ت…
خاطرات جلال آلاحمد، مشهد، ۲۶ تیر ۳۸:
صبح رفتیم طوس. مقبرهی فردوسی. دومین بار است آنجا را میبینم. ولی حیف آن همه قبضهای اعانهی ملی که در دبستان خریدیم… حیف که میگویم برای اینکه کوچکترین عامل هنری در بنای این ساختمان نیست. مثل همهی حماقتهای ساختمانی دورهی آن نرهخر، یک هیولای چشمپرکن و بیاستیل و در ظاهر مثلاً تقلیدی از سبک مقبرهی کورش و تلفیق با ستونها و سرستونهای هخامنشی و مقبرهی دخمهمانند… و اسامی رجا…
دوگانهٔ مالک و مستأجر عین و چهبسا فجیعتر از بردهداریه. ــــــ رفیقْ دکتر آرش حیدری
مشکلِ این شریعتیکوچولوهای دانشکدهٔ علوم اجتماعی این است که نیمقرن دیرتر روی خشت افتادهاند، وگرنه میتوانستند در ۵۷ شانه به شانهٔ رفقایشان به پهنای یک قرن به گذشته و آیندهٔ کشور گند بزنند و بلافاصله بهجانبِ ناموسِ سرمایهداری پرواز کنند. دوستانی که میگویند چپ مُرده و از چپ نوشتن وقت تلفکردن است، خوشخیالند. تاریخِ شکنندگیِ عقلِ…
برای نفرت و بیزاری از اصلاحطلبها دلیل کم نیست. یکیش همین لحنِ دلسوزانهٔ حقیرانه که با «آقای جمهوری اسلامی» دارند؛ و دیگر اینکه طوری کلمات را از معنا تهی میکنند که آخرش رژیمشان منفعل به نظر برسد و منتظرِ تحریکِ دیگران ـــزمانی مردم زمانی امریکاـــ تا دست به توحش و کشتار بزند. هم و غمشان این است که رژیم نجات پیدا کند حتا اگر از ایران چیزی باقی نماند. اینها خودِ خودِ شرّند.
@Shabkhwan
الگوی امنیتی یکسان است: اول دروغِ رژیم را از منظری بیطرف تأیید میکنند و اعدامِ بچههای ما را توجیه میکنند، بعد با لحنی اصلاحطلبوار از «جامعهٔ چندپاره» و «مردم خشمگین» میگویند و سؤالهای ظاهراً دلسوزانه میکنند. آخرش هم هشتگِ «نه به اعدام» میگذارند. هرکجا این شیوه را دیدید حتم کنید که ساس و واجا حرف میزنند.
@Shabkhwan
خطاب به پرستو فروهر و شرکا: این هزاران نفری که با دستِ خالی برای مقابله با اعدامِ بچههایمان به خیابان رفتند هم نمیدانستند با خطرِ مرگ روبرو میشوند؟ کورید و نمیبینید یا نفعتان در چشمبستن و باز کردنِ دهنتان است؟ اینکه حالا لالمانی گرفتهاید بیدلیل نیست.
[...]
کُشتند. میکشند تا سقوط نکنند، ولی تاریخ نشان داده که سقوطشان ــــمثلِ هر رژیمِ توتالیترِ زوالیافتهــــ سختتر و خونینتر میشود. باور ندارند که با هر اعدام روزِ واقعه را برای خودشان و تبارشان سختتر و مرگبارتر میکنند. هر اعدامِ تازه آن روز را عقبتر نمیاندازد، نزدیکتر میکند. قبل از اینها همین بوده، بعد از اینها هم همین خواهد بود.
رژیم با ترسولرز دو نفرِ دیگر از ما را به دار کشید تا پیغام بدهد در شکنندهتری…
دوستی لطفاً نسخهٔ باکیفیت و کاملی از این عکسِ درخشان از رضاشاه و محمدرضاشاه را برایم فرستاد. اینجا میگذارم تا دوستانی که پیجوی نسخهٔ باکیفیتش بودند هم استفاده کنند. مدتها جویای نامِ عکاسش بودم و هنوز نیافتهام. اگر کسی میداند یا توانست بیابد، مرا هم بیخبر نگذارد. هدیهای ایراننشان از من خواهد داشت. دنبالِ سندِ قطعیام نه گمانههایی که هست (از سهچهار عکاس نام میبرند).
@Shabkhwan
این عکس را بهترین عکسِ تاریخِ عکاسیِ ایران میدانم. این عکس نیست، تاریخ است. قاببندیِ یک تاریخ و یک رؤیاست. این دو ایرانیِ میهنپرست، دو شاه، دلمشغولِ رؤیای مشترکشان: ایران.
@Shabkhwan
❤95custom 493606757239619701351👎9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Shabkhwan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 877,738 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شبخوان” (@Shabkhwan), 1,854 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shabkhwan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
