24 Oct 2021, 03:30 UTC≈19,700 viewsread 9 August 2026
其中一個主腦CHAU C**** H** Tel: 63472772 #852spmatch #spmatch #spmatchhk #ssspmatchhk #sexpmhk #ssspmatch #partnerMatch #HKSPM #𠱓錢組織 #sexpartner #Spm #騙子手法 #千萬不要信 #約炮 #約炮專區 #sexpartnermatch #sexmatch
Channel
Sexpmhk小心騙子
@SexPartnerMatchHK
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
94subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001179108700 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SexPartnerMatchHK |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SexPartnerMatchHK |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 94 | +4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 90 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 92 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 92 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 October 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
24 Oct 2021, 03:28 UTC≈19,500 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
24 Oct 2021, 03:28 UTC≈16,300 viewsread 9 August 2026
當你睇到呢個group希望及時救到你❗️已經報警。平均每個禮拜都有受害者 𠱓錢步驟如下： 1）入會俾錢 2）去到當日有另一條友再叫你俾酒店按金 3）俾完按金，再叫你俾$4500 話俾對方partner做保證金。 4) 再叫你俾$6000 話變VIP 5) 如果唔俾會即時 delete 所有對話紀錄。 呃錢約炮telegram group 差唔多隔日就改名！主腦心虚到左一個點。 曾用過嘅名 : 852spmatch spmatch ssspmatch sexpartnermatch SexpmHK, PartnerMatch HKSPM sexpartnermatch。 近排曰曰改名，別上當。以為改名就無人知？全部都係同一個group 𠱓錢黨。 各位留低銀行過數records。準備報警，送佢地坐監。唔好放過佢地呢班老千。 佢哋運作一段時間，呃左唔少錢。 千祈唔好join 佢哋，呃錢嘅。我哋就係要識穿佢地嘅手法餵你千祈唔…
13 Sept 2021, 02:38 UTC≈13,400 viewsread 9 August 2026
睇左先(❗️係呃錢黨❗️) 本會係提供尋找性伴侶服務 (其實尋找水魚） 本會已運行三年 會員大概800人🎊 (❗️呃左起碼幾百人❗️) 所有SP或任何經本會介紹的伴侶雙方並不會涉及任何交易費用 (❗️會直接叫你過数俾佢自己，什麼性伴侶全部都係假❗️)唔好咁儍 #hkspm #sexpartnermatch
11 Sept 2021, 23:42 UTC≈12,400 viewsread 9 August 2026
當你睇到呢個group希望及時救到你❗️已經報警。平均每個禮拜都有受害者 𠱓錢步驟如下： 1）入會俾錢 2）去到當日有另一條友再叫你俾酒店按金 3）俾完按金，再叫你俾$4500 話俾對方partner做保證金。 4) 再叫你俾$6000 話變VIP 5) 如果唔俾會即時 delete 所有對話紀錄。 呃錢約炮telegram group 差唔多隔日就改名！主腦心虚到左一個點。 曾用過嘅名 : 852spmatch spmatch ssspmatch sexpartnermatch SexpmHK, PartnerMatch HKSPM sexpartnermatch。 近排曰曰改名，別上當。以為改名就無人知？全部都係同一個group 𠱓錢黨。 各位留低銀行過數records。準備報警，送佢地坐監。唔好放過佢地呢班老千。 佢哋運作一段時間，呃左唔少錢。 千祈唔好join 佢哋，呃錢嘅。我哋就係要識穿佢地嘅手法餵你千祈唔…
11 Sept 2021, 23:40 UTCviews —
Channel name was changed to «Sexpmhk小心騙子»
4 Sept 2021, 23:59 UTCviews —
Channel name was changed to «852spmhk小心騙子»
31 Aug 2021, 08:43 UTCviews —
Channel name was changed to «hkspmatchhk小心騙子»
30 Aug 2021, 23:56 UTC≈9,650 viewsread 9 August 2026
今日呃錢group 名spmatchHk。睇吓等陣又改咩名
30 Aug 2021, 23:55 UTC≈9,640 viewsread 9 August 2026
當你睇到呢個group希望及時救到你❗️已經報警 呃錢約炮telegram group 又改新名 spmatchHk。日日改名！佢嘅版主心虚到左一個點？ 用過嘅名 : 852spmatch spmatch ssspmatch sexpartnermatch SexpmHK, PartnerMatch HKSPM sexpartnermatch。 近排曰曰改名，別上當。以為改名就無人知？全部都係同一個group 𠱓錢黨。 各位留低銀行過數records。準備報警，送佢地坐監。唔好放過佢地呢班老千。 佢哋運作一段時間，呃左唔少錢。 千祈唔好join 佢哋，呃錢嘅。我哋就係要識穿佢地嘅手法餵你千祈唔好上當。大家一定要cap 圖，留證據 𠱓錢步驟如下： 1）入會俾錢 2）去到當日有另一條友再叫你俾酒店按金 3）俾完按金，再叫你俾$4500 話俾對方partner做保證金。 4) 再叫你俾$6000 話變VIP 5) 如果唔俾會…
30 Aug 2021, 14:48 UTCviews —
Channel name was changed to «spmatchhk小心騙子»
30 Aug 2021, 06:41 UTC≈7,810 viewsread 9 August 2026
呃錢黨新名 HKspmatch
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SexPartnerMatchHK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 914,285 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sexpmhk小心騙子” (@SexPartnerMatchHK), 94 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SexPartnerMatchHK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.