Channel
@SevenSnakes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
163subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001327332714 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SevenSnakes |
| Created | 9 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SevenSnakes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 163 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 163 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 210 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A pattern I've noticed with Christian vs Pagan debates I've watched in the past few years particularly regarding nationalism is that there's never an actual pagan there. It's always a Christian versus someone who is not arguing or a Christian versus someone speaking on behalf of the mysterious pagans. I can't really recall seeing one in the comments section. Pagan nationalist is mostly an urban legend. Meanwhile the…
I think I'm going to scrap my AI presentation and just record the whiteboard. I want to change the presentation also. I've been binge watching presentations on consciousness, genetics and theories of everything and in most of them they are mentioning related ideas but obviously walking around ethnic implications. I could clip a lot of these science and philosophy presenters with a back context of race realism and it…
File, posted without a caption
A show idea I've been toying with. Stable Patterns.
Glad to see someone offering an actual opposition position in the debate against Christian nationalisms.
LIVE DEBATE: Christian Nationalism v Ethno-Nationalism 7PM UK time (2PM EST Tonight I will be taking part in a debate: Christian Nationalism VS Ethno-Nationalism. I will be making the argument that race comes first. You can watch the debate LIVE here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6GYRhN5980
The greatest Future white pill is that AI has an Aryan mind. Even if it's encumbered with libtard programming it's still Aryan thought process at its foundation and there's nothing anyone can do about that. Already there is an emerging category of black presentations accusing LLM's of being default White or Eurocentric. Imagine trying to make an AI that had an African centric default based on the worldview and moral…
I consider how many philosophical channels are out there working out theories of 'everything' but will not touch the subjects of race, ethnicity or culture as phenomenal. There are a lot of knowledge gaps. The causal gap, the life gap, the consciousness gap and an ethics gap due to lack of knowledge but the ethno gap is deliberately imposed. It's not just another awkward subject like pedos in society you may not wa…
What he is saying here is the problem that inspired my direction. He's one of the smartest people I've come across but has an ethno blind spot. He deliberately avoids ethnicity and culture in his ontological considerations and ironically that might prove to be the key that unlocks the mystery he's working on. The ethno blind spot is very common.
This tracks right along with my post above and he somewhat mentions my starting point but pre concludes that 'tribal' sentiments are automatically based on a disregard of rational explanation. https://youtu.be/iAW0dj1EwEI?is=1IZT6YMN8GOSrxK8
Photo, posted without a caption
I used to say, back when I was still assuming people knew what I meant, "I am Odin." Obviously this isn't literal, I'm just some guy. But I meant it in the Crowlean way of meaning implication. When he says do as thou wilt, it's supposed to mean align your will with God and then everything is as you already want. This leads to certain issues of course but I thought it was neat. Fast forward, and it was common to mee…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SevenSnakes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 848,274 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alfred Cadoux” (@SevenSnakes), 163 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SevenSnakes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.