Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Подслушано Серпухов

Channel

Подслушано Серпухов

@Serplife

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,582subscribers

+387 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001387136648
TypeChannel
Username@Serplife
Description☆ Только живые эмоции ☆ Самые свежие новости ☆ vk.com/serplife Служба поддержки : https://vk.com/im?media=&sel=472528046&v= https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/676580296aa9672b96f992b4
Created9 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 October 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Serplife

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

23,19523,58223,388.57 August 2026 — 23,195 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,199 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,202 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,220 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,224 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,225 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,231 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,233 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,252 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,263 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,278 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,312 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,305 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,357 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,358 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,362 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,369 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,372 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,373 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,396 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,390 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,391 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,388 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,385 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,403 subscribers7 September 2026 — 23,422 subscribers10 September 2026 — 23,433 subscribers12 September 2026 — 23,470 subscribers14 September 2026 — 23,492 subscribers15 September 2026 — 23,486 subscribers30 September 2026 — 23,552 subscribers5 October 2026 — 23,549 subscribers9 October 2026 — 23,577 subscribers13 October 2026 — 23,582 subscribers7 August 202613 October 2026
34 measurements spanning 67 days, net +387. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,137–23,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Oct 2026, 17:3923,582+5
9 Oct 2026, 21:2223,577+28
5 Oct 2026, 18:0123,549-3
30 Sept 2026, 01:5823,552+66
15 Sept 2026, 22:2123,486-6
14 Sept 2026, 07:0023,492+22
12 Sept 2026, 15:5723,470+37
10 Sept 2026, 17:5523,433+11
7 Sept 2026, 13:5723,422+19
4 Sept 2026, 19:5823,403+18
2 Sept 2026, 02:4523,385-3
1 Sept 2026, 01:0423,388-3
30 Aug 2026, 23:0523,391+1
29 Aug 2026, 22:2423,390-6
29 Aug 2026, 00:1423,396+23
28 Aug 2026, 03:2523,373+1
27 Aug 2026, 02:1223,372+3
26 Aug 2026, 02:3623,369+7
25 Aug 2026, 05:4623,362+4
24 Aug 2026, 05:4923,358first reading

Engagement

395 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 23,582 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,330
158 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.749%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
165
of 395 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 156 of 158 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held395 (5 August 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Views total526,750
Reactions total3,901
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Oct 2026, 20:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,560
Videos
≈1,260
Links
≈245

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 32m
Average length
1m 40s

Measured directly from 56 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10,096 reactions across 372 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,81427.9%
👍1,17311.6%
🤬1,01510.1%
👎1,0059.95%
🙏8898.81%
🤣7847.77%
😨6376.31%
😭5595.54%
🔥5095.04%
👏1771.75%
💯1771.75%
🤪870.862%
🥰870.862%
😘660.654%
🤩600.594%
👌300.297%
😍270.267%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 375 of the 395 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,096 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 395 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 377 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Serplife. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 395 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 13 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
3.80%
15 of 395 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
15
posts carrying an erid · 15 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,320
over 15 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,460
over 362 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzquWnhud120 August 202620 August 2026
2Vtzqv84Ci916 October 20266 October 2026
2VtzqvYDaBF112 October 202612 October 2026
2Vtzqvb7VHf17 October 20267 October 2026
2VtzqvgvQ4d19 October 20269 October 2026
2VtzqvkAt7d121 August 202621 August 2026
2VtzqvoEtCs118 August 202618 August 2026
2Vtzqvwt7MD12 September 20262 September 2026
2VtzqwCfAZ119 August 20269 August 2026
2VtzqwryXTy130 August 202630 August 2026
2VtzqwvV5uW130 September 202630 September 2026
2Vtzqwxo4cj124 August 202624 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 3 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.

Measured over the 395 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

13 Oct 2026, 19:12 UTC≈1,470 views32 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

Мост на вокзале снова засветился! Теперь, хоть стало не страшно пройтись по переходу. Остается надеяться, что надолго...

🔥18🤣13👌1

13 Oct 2026, 17:49 UTC≈1,750 views6 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

12 октябрь, в 19.00 вечера- на детской площадке по адресу ул Дзержинского 38/2 была забыта мягкая игрушка "кошка". ё Нашедшему- просьба вернуть. Ребёнок очень растроился- переживает и плачет, игрушка очень дорога,подаренная на день рождения 🙏 Адм: найденные вещи ищите и присылайте в "Бюро находок Серпухов" https://vk.ru/serp_lost

❤6

13 Oct 2026, 13:54 UTC≈2,410 views36 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

Сегодня открыли долгожданный проезд и мост на трассе в Лукино ✊ Спасибо ребятам из Мостотряда за работу ❤️ 🔥 MAX | ВК | Реклама

❤21🔥10👏5

13 Oct 2026, 12:50 UTC≈2,590 views73 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

В Домодедово, в деревне Новосьяново грузовик «Скания» с щебнем перевернулся на легковую машину. За рулём грузовика с щебнем был 40-летний Дмитрий З. Он не справился с управлением и наехал на легковую машину. В результате аварии погибли 33-летняя Анастасия Б. и 7-летний Николай.

😭57😨13🤬2❤1

13 Oct 2026, 10:22 UTC≈2,780 views10 reactionsread 13 October 2026

От подписчиков: 1. Ворошилова, 136 (1 подъезд) на южной стороне дома нет отопления, заболел ребенок! Семье пришлось временно переехать к родителям. 2. УК где вы? Крюкова , 1 КТО ВИНОВАТ и ЧТО ДЕЛАТЬ? Заявку на замену радиатора я оставляла ещё 25-го августа 2026 г Повторную в сентябре. Иии тадам!!! Ничего не сделали. А вчера сотрудница УК Жилищник предложила подождать до весны. На радиаторе коррозия. Рвануть може…

❤6💯2🤬2

12 Oct 2026, 23:18 UTC≈3,690 views109 reactions1 Starread 13 October 2026
Photo

Сияние в Протвино Снято в 20:50, за качество извиняйте

🔥71❤26🙏7👍5

12 Oct 2026, 18:01 UTC≈3,340 views33 reactions1 Starread 13 October 2026

"42 Братуха" кошмарить "Нормисов" стали?

😍21😨5🤣2❤1👎1👏1🔥1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 395 posts we hold for @Serplife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@Serplife edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 October 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTCAnonymous Poll576 voters

Серпуховичи все реже ездят на работу в Москву, так решили аналитики из МГУ РАН. А Вы едите на работу в Москву ?

  1. Да27%
  2. Нет, ищу (или) работаю в Серпухове54%
  3. Я еще учусь, не знаю.20%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 395 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Серпухов | Новости, Подслушано, самое интересное
@serpukhov · 26,260
#1
Серпухов
@Serpukhov_LIVE · 4,504
#2
ВАДИМ Я ХОЧУ ТЕБЯ
@vadim_va22 · 6
#3
Умар Кремлев
@umar_kremlev · 140,672
#4
Официальный Серпухов
@serpuhov_live · 5,484
#5
МБОУ СОШ №19 имени Романа Катасонова
@serp_shkola19 · 1,492
#6
Подслушано Протвино
@podslyshano_protvino · 7,663
#7
MARVEL CREW
@MarvelCrew · 353
#8
SMItanka - Серпухов
@smitanka_ru · 2,308
#9
вайб-это
@waidto · 374
#10
SERPKOLL.MEDIA
@serpkollmedia · 1,089
#11

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Серпухов | Новости, Подслушано, самое интересное
@serpukhov · 26,260
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 13 September 2026
Умар Кремлев
@umar_kremlev · 140,672
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Подслушано Серпухов” (@Serplife), 23,582 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Serplife.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.