Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Serbs exposed Archive

Channel

Serbs exposed Archive

@Serbsexposedarchive

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

237subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002094157664
TypeChannel
Username@Serbsexposedarchive
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Serbsexposedarchive

Growth

237238237.57 August 2026 — 238 subscribers7 August 2026 — 238 subscribers15 August 2026 — 237 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 237–238 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:54237-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:17238no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:48238first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 27 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 30 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Mar 2026, 15:50 UTC749 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"I bring up the Serbs. I've just read an interesting book about the Obrenović and Karađorđević families. They're a fantastic gang of criminals. The Führer knows everything inside and out. The whole Balkans, with all its mysteries, lies before him like an open book. He tells me crazy stories about old Nikita and his daughters' marriages. He was a fraud on the throne, and old Vienna had its hands full with him. But the

4

27 Mar 2026, 11:06 UTC270 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Interesting story behind document "Serb - pure Aryan" @SerbsExposed

27 Mar 2026, 11:06 UTC322 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ratko Mladić on Israel's offer of military support to the Army of Republika Srpska. @SerbsExposed

27 Mar 2026, 11:06 UTC230 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Svetozar Vukmanović, member of the Partisan General Staff and commander of Partisan units in Bosnia, openly talks about deep Partisan-Chetnik cooperation in Eastern Bosnia, which went as far as establishing a joint staff in those regions, not surprising considering the fact that both groups were overwhelmingly Serbian. This is one of many instances where it becomes clear that Chetniks thrived on collaborating with a

27 Mar 2026, 11:06 UTC257 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

MILAN NEDIĆ: HANG THE KRAUTS! ‘Milan Nedić walked silently across Terazije, his gaze fixed on the hanged men. The muscles in his jaw twitched as if in spasm. Only when we had left the confines of this public execution ground and were already approaching [hotel] "Albanija" did he turn to me: "Oh, my Staša! This is a pitiful first time I've been out on the streets of Belgrade, right under the gallows. For me, those u

27 Mar 2026, 11:06 UTC312 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

"Have you heard of Srebrenica? Based genocide done by us Serbs against Bosniaks, this makes us true kebab removers!"

1

27 Mar 2026, 11:06 UTC363 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

D. LJOTIĆ: NEITHER FASCISM NOR HITLERISM! The founder of ZBOR and the ideological leader of the Serbian Volunteer Corps, Dimitrije Ljotić, in his magazine Otadžbina from 1935 titled "Neither Fascism, nor Hitlerism!" discusses how ZBOR is ideologically neither like fascism nor Hitlerism (National Socialism), disparaging both of these ideologies: "Both fascism and Hitlerism are based on the purely pagan conceptions o

27 Mar 2026, 11:06 UTC537 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A. Hitler: Under no circumstances would anything directed against the Croatian state be supported by Germany "In this context, Mandić returned to the subject of the Chetniks, whom he again described as scattered Yugoslav troops who had multiplied greatly at the beginning of the war with Russia. The Führer interjected here that this increase had probably been caused above all by the Italian misrule and disputed the

27 Mar 2026, 11:06 UTC998 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A. Hitler: Chetniks, unreliable and treacherous "For his part, the Führer agreed that mistrust was in order. There were two dangers that had to be fought against, the partisan danger and the danger of landing. The latter would certainly gradually diminish if the difficulties of the British and Americans in Italy continued to intensify as before. At the moment, however, it still existed. The Chetniks would undoubtedl

2

27 Mar 2026, 11:06 UTC247 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Serbian ethnologist about the infusion of Gypsy blood into the Serbian ethnos @SerbsExposed

27 Mar 2026, 11:06 UTC232 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

NEDIĆ'S SERBIA: CHETNIK PLAYGROUND August Winter's telegram to Walter Warlimont concerning the situation in the Territory of the Military Commander in Serbia, july 5, 1944: I. The possibilities of mobilizing Serbian nationalist forces alongside the German Wehrmacht against Tito are politically conditioned. It is not the task of the O.B.S.O. to solve them, But it seems necessary to point out the disappointment that

27 Mar 2026, 11:06 UTC168 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

In Appendix from Momcilo Dobrich's book "Belgrade's Best: The Serbian Volunteer Corps", it's shown that annually thousands of members of SDS [Serb State Guard], the largest "collaborationist" unit in German-occupied Serbia with around 25,000–36,000 men, deserted to Draža's faction of Chetniks. As a result, dozens of officers from "Serb State Guard" were executed or sent to P.O.W. camps for treason, including 2 gener

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Serbsexposedarchive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,017,818 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Serbs exposed Archive” (@Serbsexposedarchive), 237 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Serbsexposedarchive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.