Channel
@Sepniix
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
208subscribers
-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003857145304 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sepniix |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 11 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sepniix |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 10:15 | 208 | -7 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 215 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 219 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 223 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 227 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 230 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 236 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 243 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 243 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 242 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
CRAFTLAND FOLLOWERS GUEST ACCOUNT EXCHANGE SERVICE IF YOU HAVE 20 ACCOUNTS THEN I WILL TURN INTO 40 ACCOUNTS WE WILL EXCHANGE OUR ACCOUNTS WE BOTHER GET BENEFITS INTERSTED DM @RISHUHERE01
Signed RISHU
DARK DESIRE BUNDLE FOR SALE 😁 DM @rishuhere01 SASTE ME DUNGA YR
Signed RISHU
Rishu New generator LEAKED Don't need to activate SEPARATELY it will automatically activate it during generating Link https://t.me/rishucodex134/2061 ☠️ Use 1111 vpn
Signed RISHU
SEPNIX !! pinned «RISHU GENERATOR NO BAN TAKE OUT YOUR DESIRE BUNDLE ❤️ GEN UNLIMITED ACCOUNTS ACTIVATE IT USING PROVIDED ACTIVATOR https://t.me/rishucodex/414»
RISHU GENERATOR NO BAN TAKE OUT YOUR DESIRE BUNDLE ❤️ GEN UNLIMITED ACCOUNTS ACTIVATE IT USING PROVIDED ACTIVATOR https://t.me/rishucodex/414
Signed RISHU
ACCESS TOKEN TO LOGIN PROOF 😁 ANYBODY INTERESTED FOR PURCHASE IT DM USERNAME @Piyushhere001
Signed RISHU
ANYBODY WANT TO PURCHASE RISHU CAPTURE SCRIPT DM ME ✅ USERNAME 🤞 @Piyushhere001
Signed RISHU
SEPNIX !! pinned «DYNAMIC DUO CHECKER OB53 LEAKED ✅ https://t.me/rishucodex/368»
DYNAMIC DUO CHECKER OB53 LEAKED ✅ https://t.me/rishucodex/368
Signed RISHU
SEPNIX !! pinned Deleted message
SEPNIX !! pinned «EAT TO ACCESS API SOURCE CODE LEAKED 😁😁 https://t.me/rishucodex/334»
EAT TO ACCESS API SOURCE CODE LEAKED 😁😁 https://t.me/rishucodex/334
Signed RISHU SYNTEX
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Sepniix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Sepniix named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SEPNIX !!” (@Sepniix), 208 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sepniix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.