🇺🇸 @SenTedCruz
Channel
Senator Ted Cruz
@SenTedCruz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,523subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001402666125 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SenTedCruz |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SenTedCruz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 1,523 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 1,529 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 1,533 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:40 | 1,533 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
🇺🇸 @SenTedCruz
🔻 The Biden White House is abandoning our allies and enabling the aggression of Vladimir Putin. https://t.co/Sdi9AD0XBG January 14, 2022 at 12:32AM via Twitter @SenTedCruz
🔻 Nord Stream 2 is a geopolitical tool for Putin's aggression across Europe. https://t.co/LcTDoX4cOZ January 13, 2022 at 11:40PM via Twitter @SenTedCruz
🔻 The people of Ukraine have called on the Senate to pass sanctions on Nord Stream 2. They have said their very existence is threatened by what it enables Putin to do. https://t.co/eCZ3Ctii0u January 13, 2022 at 11:31PM via Twitter @SenTedCruz
🔻 Today, the Senate will have the opportunity to sanction Putin’s Nord Stream 2 pipeline. It should be an easy vote to support our allies and defend America’s interests. https://t.co/jBb8DWKnMz January 13, 2022 at 07:12PM via Twitter @SenTedCruz
🔻 Chuck Schumer should take his own advice. https://t.co/jHwK9r4Uol January 13, 2022 at 05:43PM via Twitter @SenTedCruz
🔻 .@TheIjr: Ted Cruz Fires Back at Reporter Asking Why Republicans Are Not Wearing Masks https://t.co/TaBtofITax January 13, 2022 at 06:23AM via Twitter @SenTedCruz
🔻 .@JoshRogin: “How Biden is working to save Putin’s pipeline” https://t.co/lVtuJCsKYN January 13, 2022 at 05:16AM via Twitter @SenTedCruz
🔻 Democrats are engaged in a double power-grab with a twist! https://t.co/I2ykAKh7w3 January 13, 2022 at 04:26AM via Twitter @SenTedCruz
🔻 It will be “doomsday for democracy” if the filibuster is ended. -Chuck Schumer, 2005 https://t.co/wh3r5mr1Sx January 13, 2022 at 03:52AM via Twitter @SenTedCruz
🔻 Was Joe Biden lying when he said ending the filibuster is a very dangerous move or was he telling the truth? https://t.co/0A9FpCVNrs January 13, 2022 at 01:56AM via Twitter @SenTedCruz
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SenTedCruz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 532,021 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@SenTedCruz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Senator Ted Cruz” (@SenTedCruz), 1,523 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SenTedCruz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.