Gua bukan ga ngertiin kondisi atau skrng dia lagi kesusahan atau ga. Gua disini cuman minta tanggung jawab aja, mau seburuk apapun jaringan, sampe bener bener kaga bisa ngabarin? Bahkan sempet aktif di bbrpa waktu sampai akhirnya last week. Gua udh sabar selama ini buat nunggu kepastian, gua sebagai buyyer juga berhak nanya tentang pesenan gua, udh berjalan sampai mana, ada kendala apa. Kalo berkabar that's oke. masa…

Channel
sepil
@Sellergxamanah
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004490038628 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sellergxamanah |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sellergxamanah |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 2 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1638.5%
- avg views ÷ 2 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 32.8
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 426 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
sepil pinned «Halo, guys. Disini dengan Edgaf (@Heereung) mau nyeritain keraguan gua dengan seller rapch @ivonettes karena sampai sekarang, pesanan rapch gua belum selesai dan sellernya ngilang udah seminggu tanpa alasan.»
Photo, posted without a caption
📲 Form received, 01.0 Phase will be start. First, please make a payment with cost IDR55,000. (12k + 43k) Don't forget to send the proof of payment without edit or crop.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Last seen nya within a week, display emojinya "DNFI except cust" tapi chat gua ga di bales juga. Wajar ga kalau mulai muncul rada curiga?
4. Dari tanggal 12 itu, dia ga ada ngabarin gua lagi. Beberapa kali gua rechat ga dibales juga. Sampe akhirnya ditanggal 21 dia ngabarin dan dia minta maaf buat keterlambatan nya, karena ada masalah rl yang bersifat privasi ga bisa gua sebutin di spill an ini. Dan di akhir bbc itu dia ngasih opsi ke gua, "mau di refund apa dilanjutin?" karena dia ngasih opsi begitu gua mikirnya dia masih bisa ngerjain dong, yaudah gu…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
3. Setelah bundlenya beres ditanggal 12 Agustus, dia bilang kalau rapchnya dikerjain besok (anw, gua ga inrush ya), gua okein lah itu. Nah, di hari yang sama pas tanggal 12 Agustus gua tuh nginfoin, ternyata tema yang gua request ini tuh copyright, akhirnya gua konfirmasi lah ke dia, yang awalnya dari tema spiderman, jadi spiderman enthu, ga jauh lah (gua juga bantuin dia nyari emoji prem noh). Setelah tanggal 12 itu…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Sellergxamanah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“sepil” (@Sellergxamanah), 2 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sellergxamanah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.