Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Клуб Seiya (и навигация)

Channel

Клуб Seiya (и навигация)

@Seiya_club

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,863subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001812041799
TypeChannel
Username@Seiya_club
Created8 October 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Seiya_club

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,8369,8639,849.57 August 2026 — 9,837 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,837 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,838 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,836 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,840 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,842 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,844 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,849 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,855 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,860 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,863 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 43 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,832–9,867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 11:169,863+3
14 Sept 2026, 16:199,860+5
11 Sept 2026, 05:389,855+6
6 Sept 2026, 13:559,849+5
30 Aug 2026, 04:139,844+2
24 Aug 2026, 18:059,842+2
20 Aug 2026, 16:229,840+4
14 Aug 2026, 14:189,836-2
10 Aug 2026, 22:239,838+1
7 Aug 2026, 10:459,837no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:359,837first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 8 October 2022the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

973 reactions across 3 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
47949.2%
👍36937.9%
🔥889.04%
🥰161.64%
😁121.23%
👎50.514%
🏆10.103%
👌10.103%
👏10.103%
😍10.103%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 973 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2022 to 29 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2023, 18:13 UTC≈110,000 views398 reactionsread 29 August 2026

❗️Правила клуба Seiya: (простые, но важные) 0 - ВСЕ файлы из курсов и уроков Алины Макаровой, cake by angel (Ангелина Коба), Кристина Лова ( krislen_cake), Марина Захарова (zaharova dessert), Оксана Лобачева, Ольга Шмукста (Love Cake), Мария Владимировская (vse.v.zefire), Kica, Ирина Мошкина (цветы) и Gift cookies, Манахова 2024 год - отправляйте друг другу ТОЛЬКО в личку. В чаты загружать их нельзя, т.к. чат мог

244👍119🔥30😁5

8 Oct 2022, 07:28 UTC≈204,000 views482 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🍰 Сладкая выпечка, торты, пирожные, десерты... Кондитерский клуб Чат-болталка. Новый: https://t.me/+3FpHwOa6qtNiOGJi Прошлые: https://t.me/+R6Gz2YJ6L3ZmMjAy https://t.me/Seiya_dessert9 Старые чаты: https://t.me/+voVgIBzQsfA4MDhi https://t.me/+2Z132OxTQq9lMzUy https://t.me/+mxuSskKYj3FiNWIy https://t.me/+lLlZyWb80GRiNDAy 🌹Seiya - Цветы из мастики, шоколада и т.д. https://t.me/+ItzXvFlbE3AzYjBi Прошлая группа: https:

👍243175🔥33🥰16😁7👎5👌1👏1

8 Oct 2022, 07:26 UTC≈87,700 views93 reactionsread 29 August 2026

😉 Для удобной навигации:

60🔥25👍7🏆1

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @Seiya_club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Декор кондитеров
@konditer_decor · 22,860
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Клуб Seiya (и навигация)” (@Seiya_club), 9,863 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Seiya_club.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.