Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Seichat

Channel

Seichat

@Seichatt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,384subscribers

-50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001881215639
TypeChannel
Username@Seichatt
Created14 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Seichatt

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3841,4341,4097 August 2026 — 1,434 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,434 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,428 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,425 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,419 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,418 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,417 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,412 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,411 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,407 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,403 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,396 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,394 subscribers26 September 2026 — 1,384 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 50 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,377–1,442 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 13:361,384-10
15 Sept 2026, 21:591,394-2
12 Sept 2026, 08:211,396-7
8 Sept 2026, 12:351,403-4
3 Sept 2026, 14:001,407-4
30 Aug 2026, 21:451,411-1
27 Aug 2026, 15:371,412-5
24 Aug 2026, 10:111,417-1
21 Aug 2026, 00:421,418-1
17 Aug 2026, 23:381,419-6
14 Aug 2026, 13:351,425-3
10 Aug 2026, 19:421,428-6
7 Aug 2026, 10:321,434no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:231,434first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 5 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

170 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤13579.4%
👍137.65%
🔥63.53%
🤡52.94%
😭42.35%
💘31.76%
🙏21.18%
🕊10.588%
🫡10.588%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
26
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Seichatt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 March 2026 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 May 2026, 21:19 UTC≈1,220 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Юджи официально особый ранг. А Макора в руках Юка стал сильнее других версий

❤19💘3🤡2🙏1

Signed Jalol

29 Apr 2026, 17:27 UTC≈1,330 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Иллюстрация Юджи и Махито от: Слева Геге Акутами, а справа — Юджи Ивасаки

❤20🤡1🙏1

Signed Jalol

28 Apr 2026, 13:54 UTC≈1,010 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Иллюстрации персонажей! Тодо, Юджи, Нобара, Мафую, Иори, Махито и Макора.

❤17

Signed Jalol

27 Apr 2026, 15:34 UTC661 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Еще иллюстрация от Юдзи Ивасаки.

❤7🔥2

Signed Jalol

27 Apr 2026, 12:24 UTC708 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Обложка 3 тома, +будет бонусная глава

❤14🔥1

Signed Jalol

27 Apr 2026, 12:13 UTC637 views10 reactions26 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Арты от Геге Акутами и Юдзи Ивасаки.

❤9🔥1

Signed Jalol

27 Apr 2026, 12:13 UTC688 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новые иллюстрации от Юдзи Ивасаки

❤4🔥1

Signed Jalol

11 Mar 2026, 13:14 UTC≈1,400 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ответ: Тоджи сильнее. Все потому, что он банально умнее и опытнее ее во всех интеллектуальных способностей, например, Тоджи может усиливать свои статы (т.е. сделать выше, чем в базе): «Я в курсе, что раскрытие сути своих способностей — это условие пакта, которое повышает твою эффективность в бою (т.е. статы), как и у обычных магов». В жжк существует такой пакт, что если ты рассказываешь врагу, как работают твои си…

❤23🔥1🤡1

Signed Jalol

10 Mar 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,010 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Давайте все-таки определим раз и навсегда: смогла ли Маки превзойти Тоджи или только на его уровне осталась? А может она вовсе слабее все ещё из-за каких-то факторов?

❤12🕊1🤡1

Signed Jalol

5 Mar 2026, 09:07 UTC≈1,260 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Несколько фактов из главы: Тодо жив; Мегуми мёртв; Показана Нобара; Показано полное лицо Юджи; Больше никогда не будут рождаться шаманы; Теперь Юджи хочет найти физически одарённых (как Тоджи, Маки, Цуруги) и выяснить их происхождения, скорее, чтобы примкнуть их к себе, ибо с ними окончательно он не способен покончить; Юджи в будущем планирует становиться проклятым предметом как Сукуна, чтобы кто-то вроде него съел е…

👍13❤6😭4🫡1

Signed Jalol

5 Mar 2026, 08:58 UTC990 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сливы новой главы модуля с переводом в нашем чате https://t.me/+vg2DQKvHAfo5ZTUy

❤4

Signed Jalol

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Seichatt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

JJK. Магическая битва. Модуль (Mojuro/Modulo)
@jjkrussianarchive · 23,918
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 September 2026
ХОКЕ | meowh0cki
@anih0cki · 26,277
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Seichat” (@Seichatt), 1,384 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Seichatt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.