Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Тайные знания Светланы Мусс

Channel

Тайные знания Светланы Мусс

@SecretsSvetaMuss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

944subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001748715059
TypeChannel
Username@SecretsSvetaMuss
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SecretsSvetaMuss

Growth

9449569507 August 2026 — 956 subscribers7 August 2026 — 956 subscribers14 August 2026 — 944 subscribers21 August 2026 — 946 subscribers28 August 2026 — 944 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 942–958 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 13:01944-2
21 Aug 2026, 05:33946+2
14 Aug 2026, 16:03944-12
7 Aug 2026, 14:10956no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:16956first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.29%
avg views ÷ 944 subscribers
Avg views / post
68.8
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (26 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total344
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3243.8%
🔥1824.7%
😍1013.7%
❤‍🔥45.48%
22.74%
🍓22.74%
👏22.74%
💋11.37%
💔11.37%
🕊11.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC38 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Какая красота жизни, в каждом моменте! Это чувство любви и благодарности можно чувствовать только в доверии тому, что всё слздаёься силой любви и мне достаточно просто быть, что бы иметь! Расслабление системы даёт переход на другую частоту, меняются вибрации , а мы знаем что здесь всё наши проекции. Меняется состояние, меняются события, люди…. Именно в этом состоит бОльший труд для женщины…. Расслабиться, так ведь

❤‍🔥3🔥2👏1🕊1

3 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC65 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Что нужно уметь или осознанно учиться, чтобы создать здоровые зрелые отношения? 1. Уметь говорить о своих чувствах Но…. Не в претензии, не через ты должен. А через я чувствую, мне важно, мне было бы приятно. 2. Уметь быть в честности Не врать себе. Не врать партнёру. Даже если это неудобно. Даже если страшно. Честность — это не резать правду-матку. Это — не скрывать, не утаивать, не делать вид, что всё ок, когд

6🔥2💔1

3 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC61 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем тему отношений ⤵️

2 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC85 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥3😍2👏1

1 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC95 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Отношения — это не про идеально, хотя многие ищут целую жизнь идеального, так и не дождавшись. Отношение это про близко. Когда два человека решают быть вместе, они выбирают не просто партнёра. Они выбирают пространство, где можно быть настоящим. Где можно говорить о чувствах — не в претензии, не с обидой, а через любовь. Где можно сказать- Мне было бы приятно, если бы ты сделал так. И услышать в ответ- Я услышал те

7😍3

30 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTC107 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

•Сейчас с вами взаимодействую в личном ведении, есть 1 место на распаковку •Даю в записи тренинг по раскрытию сверхспособностей •Увезу вас в тур по сакральным местам Египта За подробностями пишите в личные @Svetamuss

2🔥1😍1

30 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC105 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3

30 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC97 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

1

28 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC110 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Давайте пойдём в тему отношений и найдём ответ на свой вопрос! Начну с вопроса к вам: Кто сейчас в поиске близкого партнёра, а кто налаживает текущие?

1

28 Jul 2026, 16:07 UTC105 viewsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня было много вопросов на тему отношений! На втором месте были деньги, на втором!!!!

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @SecretsSvetaMuss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 63,367 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ева Снежинская про отношения
@pcollege_EvaSneg · 44,182
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
Медитации
@podsoznanie_you · 82,756
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тайные знания Светланы Мусс” (@SecretsSvetaMuss), 944 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SecretsSvetaMuss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.