Channel
@SecHorse
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
37,446subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001164706519 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SecHorse |
| Description | 欢迎来到二手🐴，请使用下列方式投稿: 1.使用浏览器访问 2h.ma (不要在TG内打开，复制到浏览器打开) 2.使用投稿机器人(TelegramMini APP) @sec_horse_bot 如果出现投稿被拒绝的情况请参照投稿规则 https://t.me/SecHorse/1233 进行自查，确认自查无误但仍被拒收的，请联系管理员 @JerryY1n 如出现BUG请找 @SkyLostColor 反馈 另外请尽可能花时间去阅读一下pinned的内容，都是很重要或者有用的信息 |
| Created | 16 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SecHorse |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 37,446 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 37,442 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 37,435 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 37,432 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 37,428 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 37,427 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:41 | 37,426 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 37,433 | first reading |
101 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 101 (6 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 94,496 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 00:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
#出售 #电子垃圾 #arm主板 联系 dio sama 价格 120 希沃rk3399 4+32G，买来准备当ipmi用的但是HDMI in没办法驱动 玩不明白arm 有linux和安卓固件。目前安装的系统是debian 11 配置如图: usb 2.0 3个，包含otg usb3.0 1个 hdmi out 1个 hdmi in 1个 千兆网口 1个 wifi 耳机接口
Signed 二手🐴投稿 Bot
#出售 #电子垃圾 #raid卡 联系 dio sama 价格 110 dell h710p 1g缓存 raid卡
Signed 二手🐴投稿 Bot
#出售 #电子产品 #漏油器 #路由器 #小米 联系 dio sama 价格 300 红米ax6000已刷uboot100mb版本 固件刷的237的openwrt 自定伊拉克橙色
Signed 二手🐴投稿 Bot
#出售 #电子产品 #iPhone #SE2 联系 Miko Arisu❤️ 价格 550 iPhone SE 2020，当伊拉克橙色卖，256G美版无锁，换过电池，功能正常。不包邮。
Signed 二手🐴投稿 Bot
#出售 #电子产品 #R2S #软路由 联系 江泽妮可 价格 220包邮 R2S软路由，C口电源，带一个32G闪迪存储卡，小风扇，电源线。升级x86闲置了，已刷iStoreOS，到手即用，正常使用，包邮非偏远地区。🐴友可小刀。走🐟 #已出
Signed 二手🐴投稿 Bot
#出售 #电子产品 #华为 #耳机 #TWS 联系 KeaganREI 价格 280 因为买了美国华为，所以出一台中国华为 FreeBuds 7i 深空灰色，几乎全新，没怎么用，功能一切正常。带原装盒子，没有配件，主要是通话效果很好。 三句话以内成交包邮，厦门可自提。价格可聊，喜欢直接拍，细节私聊。 为节约大家的时间，屠龙刀和验尸官勿扰，二手商品一概售出不退不换，感谢理解。
Signed 二手🐴投稿 Bot
#出售 #电子垃圾 #主板 #CPU 联系 Baiye 价格 1100 微星Z490战斧 11400F 功能都正常 板 450 CPU 650
Signed 二手🐴投稿 Bot
#出售 #其他 #镜头 联系 璃夜不是瑠夜 价格 150广东包邮 佳能ef 35-70 f3.5-4.5a，比我还老的东西，有灰但是外观还好，自己判断
Signed 二手🐴投稿 Bot
#出售 #其他 #镜头 联系 璃夜不是瑠夜 价格 300 是谁拿走了我的300块钱我愿意用永诺35mmf2交换😱 外观无磕碰，默认微灰，佳能ef卡口
Signed 二手🐴投稿 Bot
#出售 #电子产品 #Canokey 联系 DDoSolitary 价格 80 不包邮 Canokey Pigeon 23 年 11 月购入，固件版本 2.0.1-0-g84e9c8c3，已拆封，未使用过，脸熟可刀 （当时买来想用来替换手上 1.5 版本固件的 pigeon 的，但一直懒得动，现在想起来了但 canary 也出了就直接买新的了）
Signed 二手🐴投稿 Bot
#出售 #电子产品 #LG #Gram #轻薄本 联系 Sakura Black 价格 1399 LG Gram 14 2022/11代i5 512G 白色 14Z95P 日版喵 CPU是i5 1155g7，开机键带指纹 原版镜面的，自己换了雾面的了不是很喜欢镜面 日版键盘，正常使用不影响，整机重量969克 然后键盘方向上键有问题用不了，懒得换了，这个自己换也不贵 成色比较抽象，见图捏 配置见图，8gRAM是板载，双2280硬盘位 屏幕1080p，16比10比例 机身接口2C2A HDMI 3.5耳机孔 TF读卡器 两个C均为雷电4，A口两个都是10Gbps 直接PD充电即可 其实这台我两年前就在频道发过一次（） 当时手上有两台gram，所以把另一台i7的出了 于是这一台我又用了两年（） 我是不会说我卖掉这台的原因是我又收了一台16寸的gram（） 顺丰到付，深圳可自提
Signed 二手🐴投稿 Bot
#出售 #电子产品 #数据线 #无线网卡 #充电头 #VGA转接器 #索尼 联系 Renna 价格 付邮送 闲置清理大合集 1. 索尼MULTI数据线 2. 小米5V3A充电器 3. SATA转mSATA转接卡 4. AX201NGW 无线网卡 5. 3160NGW 无线网卡 6. HDMI转VGA转接器 7. Quest 5V2A C口充电头 大概都能用，但手头没有设备测不了可用性 欢迎打包带走 熟的直接线下拿走 #已出
Signed 二手🐴投稿 Bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @SecHorse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@SecHorse edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 292,063 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“二手🐴——投稿看简介” (@SecHorse), 37,446 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SecHorse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.