Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sean

@SeanChannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

5,029subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001083843120
TypeChannel
Username@SeanChannel
Created19 December 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SeanChannel

Growth

5,0075,0295,0186 August 2026 — 5,007 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,007 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,011 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,026 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,029 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,004–5,032 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:135,029+3
10 Aug 2026, 03:015,026+15
6 Aug 2026, 19:525,011+4
6 Aug 2026, 03:485,007no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:445,007first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 June 2019the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,116 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍36432.6%
21319.1%
🎉18916.9%
😍13311.9%
❤‍🔥312.78%
🏆292.60%
🐳252.24%
🤩232.06%
👀181.61%
🥰181.61%
👎151.34%
👾151.34%
131.16%
🤮131.16%
🔥60.538%
🤡50.448%
😁40.358%
🍌20.179%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2019 to 18 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SeanChannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2019 to 18 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 May 2026, 12:30 UTC≈17,700 views68 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

I share links a lot, on slides and in chat. So I made tg․pe. Scan the QR code, or just type it. Like tg.pe/1Az. I just gave it a new design. Clean and simple, and it's free. 我做的 tg․pe,演講分享連結很好用 掃 QR code,或短到用背的都記得住,整串就 tg.pe/vMs 最近重新設計了介面,簡潔有力、完全免費,歡迎試試 Try it: https://tg.pe/demo

👍2117❤‍🔥17😍7🔥6

Signed Sean Wei

29 Nov 2024, 17:48 UTC≈83,300 views193 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

我從台灣 🇹🇼 搭 30 小時的飛機,到聖文森 🇻🇨 服外交替代役 I took 30-hour flight from Taiwan 🇹🇼 to Saint Vincent 🇻🇨 to do the volunteer on ICT projects. 今早趁空檔飛了一下空拍機 跟大家分享聖文森美景 >< This morning, I had some free time and used my drone to capture the beautiful landscape. I'm excited to share this video with you all. 🥰

129😍2713🤮13🐳11

Signed Sean Wei

8 Nov 2023, 13:36 UTC≈87,900 views243 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

來玩玩看新功能 抽 3️⃣ 人送半年份 Telegram Premium ⭐️ 為提高中獎機率 限 🇹🇼 台灣帳號 & 同時加入指定頻道 72 Hr 後開獎 歡迎來沾沾喜氣 (⁎⁍̴̛ᴗ⁍̴̛⁎)

👍166😍32👀18👾15🤩12

Signed Sean 🇹🇼

8 Nov 2023, 13:36 UTC≈75,900 views158 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😍67🏆29🎉26👍26👎10

Signed Sean 🇹🇼

27 Nov 2022, 09:54 UTC≈76,700 views241 reactionsread 12 August 2026

耶 研究所推甄錄取啦 🎊 雖然旅程中充滿各種神奇的人事物,但感覺剛進大學也才沒多久之前,轉眼間又要進到下一個階段了 這次時程壓得比較緊,審查資料濃縮在 2 頁 PDF 內 回頭看四年前升大學的備審資料,37 頁中水量也不少呢 😝 https://blog.sean.taipei/2022/11/nctu

🎉131👍5229🥰18🤩11

Signed Sean 🇹🇼

6 Aug 2022, 08:30 UTC≈71,500 views109 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

在全球 510 萬 Kubernetes 開發者之中,這兩年來每週固定有 200 多萬人次瀏覽 k8s.io 網站 k/website 專案共有 4,100 位貢獻者,其中 500 位是中文語系貢獻者,很榮幸能成為 8 位 Approver 之一 這兩天寫了 k8s 社群運作介紹,歡迎各位一同加入貢獻者的行列 😊 https://blog.sean.taipei/2022/08/kubernetes

👍62❤‍🔥14🐳1411🎉8

Signed Sean ️ 🇹🇼 ️

31 May 2022, 04:16 UTC≈49,000 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

耶!我加入 Kubernetes 的 GitHub 組織啦 🎉 從 6 週前讀文件發現格式錯誤,發了第一個 PR 後來覺得掛個 K8s 組織看起來就酷酷的,就跑來申請啦 😝 有興趣者歡迎來 @SeanTalk 交流交流 ><

🎉22👍178😁3👎2

Signed Sean 🇹🇼

14 Jan 2022, 06:00 UTC≈41,600 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

考到 CEH 道德駭客認證啦 🎉 但其實他最困難的地方就是報名費而已 教育部出錢當然參加 之後可以到處招搖撞騙啦 總之留個 blog 記錄,讓後人參考 https://blog.sean.taipei/2022/01/ceh

3👎3

Signed Sean 🇹🇼

10 Dec 2021, 04:00 UTC≈42,000 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

在 macOS 的 Pages 匯出 PDF 時,中文字總會從「更加精進自己的能力」變成「更更加精進⾃自⼰己的能⼒力力」 經過組內踩雷經驗,去研究了 Unicode 內建的 Normalize 標準化函式,來跟大家分享這個酷酷的小知識 (兩年沒寫部落格了,我先道歉 😝) https://blog.sean.taipei/2021/12/unicode

🤡5👍21

Signed Sean 🇹🇼

14 Mar 2020, 07:20 UTC≈110,000 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

大家還記得去年 48 級分正取交大資工 的新聞嗎 XD 當時協助我其中一位的學長,今年特別發起了一個 Instagram 專案,製作了教高三考生做好備審的懶人包,並免費提供給大家 裡面內容都是去年對我非常有幫助的觀念,在這邊推薦給大家追蹤 😉 👉 @apac.2020 備審航艦

👍3

Signed Sean 🇹🇼

23 Feb 2020, 03:00 UTC≈107,000 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✳️ 靠北交大 2.0 # 特色功能 + 登入交大帳號即可審核文章,所有人都是小編 + 快速審文:連動 Telegram Bot 即時審文 + 來源可信度分級:具名投稿 > 交大校內 > 台灣 > 境外,依等級提供不同通過門檻 + 多社群平台支援:支援 Telegram、Plurk、Twitter、Facebook 👉 https://x.nctu.app/

👍31

Signed Sean 🇹🇼

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SeanChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,041,696 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sean” (@SeanChannel), 5,029 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SeanChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.