Scientific pharmacists pinned a photo

Channel
Scientific pharmacists
@Scientificpharmacists
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,194subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001657831219 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Scientificpharmacists |
| Description | 🩺 للأطباء والصيادلة 📖 ▫️كل ما يتعلق بالأدوية ، أحدث guidelines ، حالات سريرية ، مراجع طبية 📚 للتواصل و الاعلان ⬇️ @pharmanerdbot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Scientificpharmacists |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 25,194 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 25,197 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 25,202 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 25,208 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 25,212 | +9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 25,203 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 25,210 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 25,214 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 22 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 466
- Videos
- 16
- Links
- 257
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
534 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 382 | 71.5% | |
| 👏 | 42 | 7.87% | |
| 🥰 | 31 | 5.81% | |
| 👍 | 29 | 5.43% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 4.31% | |
| 💊 | 7 | 1.31% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 0.936% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 0.562% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.562% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 0.562% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 0.375% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.375% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.187% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.187% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 534reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
السؤال لكم بدون أستخدام Google 🥰أو Ai ما هو الدواء الموجود في الصيدليات الذي يمكن أستخدامه بشكل OTC لمنع تدفق الحليب و لو بشكل مؤقت لكن أستخدامه غير مصرح بهِ Off label ؟
🔥7❤6🥰4👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰8👏4❤2
كيفية تنشيف الحليب بأستخدام دواء Cabergoline ❔ توّد بعض النساء منع عملية الرضاعة الطبيعة سواء خلال مرحلة الفطام للطفل أو لأي سبب ثاني ، لذلك قد يتطلب الأمر تدخلاً طبياً بأستخدام أدوية محددة لها القدرة على منع lactation ومنها دواء Cabergoline 🔔 : خطة العلاج تتضمن اجراءات و تقنيات غير دوائية كخط علاجي أولي يجربها الطبيب المعالج ، و نوّد الأشارة أن دواء Cabergoline و صرفه في هذهِ الحالة هو POM و يصرف تحت أشراف طبي …
❤28👍2👏2🥰2
بعد تصريح نقابة الصيادلة العراقيين 💜بأنو شغل الـ Cosmetology والـ Skin Care صار ضمن صلاحيات الصيدلي، فهالشي خلّى الحاجة للتعلم والتطوير بهلمجال أكبر من قبل ولهذا لازم أي صيدلي أو مهتم يبدأ يتعلم بشكل صحيح وعلمي حتى يگدر يتميز فعلاً بهالتخصص وللأمانة، من أكثر الأشخاص الي شفتهم مهتمين ومركزين ع هالجانب بشكل كامل هي د. فاطمة، وكورس الـ Cosmo المطور مالتهة يعتبر من الكورسات الي داخلة بالتفاصيل فعلاً، لأن مو مجرد معلومات…
❤7❤🔥3💘3🍓2👏2🥰1
طبعا الجواب الصحيح هو All of above ................... 🔸️ Clonidine stimulates presynaptic alpha-2a adrenergic receptors in the brainstem (specifically the locus coeruleus) and spinal cord. These receptors have autoinhibitory effects. 🔸️ Some effects may also be mediated by postsynaptic alpha-2 receptors and non-adrenergic imidazoline receptors. α2 > α1 >>>>> β; α2:α1 selectivity ratio 220:1
❤15❤🔥2👍2💊1
Posted without readable text
❤8
الفكرة ان هناك اكثر من نوع من Urinary Incontinence و لكل نوع فسلجة خاصة تستدعي طريقة علاج مختلفة 🫥لذلك مثلاً النوع الاول الذي يعالج بأستخدام Solifenacin هو Urgency Urinary incontinence 🫥النوع الثاني الذي يعالج ب Pseudoephedrine هو Stress urinary incontinence 🫥النوع الثالث الذي يعالج ب Tamsulosin هو overflow urinary incontinence
❤19👍2
ثلاث مرضى يعانون من Urinary Incontinence زار كل واحد منهم طبيب Urologist و لكن الطبيب وصف لكل واحد منهم دواء مختلف عن الاخر بشكل غريب ❗️❗️ 🟣الاول وصف لهُ دواء solifenacin ( Antimuscarinic agent ) 🟣الثاني وصف لهُ pseudoephedrine ( a -Adrenergic agonists ) 🟣الثالث وصف لهُ tamsulosin ( a -Adrenergic antagonist ) ما التفسير برأيكم ، رغم أن بعض الادوية تتعارض بطريقة عملها و مع ذلك تستخدم في علاج نفس المرض
❤20👍2🔥1
هو صدك منتجات Glutathione فعالة و تغير شكل و لون الانسان لو اكو مبالغة و دعاية تجارية بالموضوع ؟ 🔥 نريد تجارب الناس الي مستخدميه 🩷 📣 حتى نشرحلكم الموضوع بعدها بشكل علمي و قطعي
❤21💊1
Back pain is NOT a pregabalin deficiency. Diagnose the cause, don't just mask the symptom." "Pregabalin is a medication, not a supplement. Stop prescribing it for every ache."
❤39👏8👍6🔥3💊1
Guess the disease?
👏10🔥6👀2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Scientificpharmacists. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 286,734 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@no1_oone · 313,664
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Scientific pharmacists” (@Scientificpharmacists), 25,194 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Scientificpharmacists.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.