Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🥩𝐒𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐄𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞🥩

Channel

🥩𝐒𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐄𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞🥩

@Scandalous_Estate_Kris

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

73subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002211736693
TypeChannel
Username@Scandalous_Estate_Kris
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged5 times, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Scandalous_Estate_Kris

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

727372.57 August 2026 — 72 subscribers9 August 2026 — 72 subscribers29 August 2026 — 73 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 22 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 72–73 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 21:3773+1
9 Aug 2026, 22:4772no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:1472first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53530731498249992094437.3%
custom 52088690602210980652016.9%
custom 52378201119134929681714.4%
custom 5388633305782434435119.32%
custom 537334387933868586486.78%
custom 535263054485521121643.39%
custom 537092620788801266343.39%
custom 520618118808288879132.54%
custom 535514661400661962932.54%
custom 535277937406195298721.69%
custom 539098078458257111521.69%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC17 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаю рисовать Моргаф..

custom 52378201119134929682custom 53530731498249992092custom 53886333057824344352custom 52088690602210980651

21 Jul 2026, 23:04 UTC75 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌚Игры я создавать не умею, Но кого бы вы выбрали, если бы она была?

custom 53530731498249992095custom 53886333057824344355custom 52088690602210980654

18 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC73 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🩸Мои хорошие, сегодня я стал на один год старше. Всё, что я хочу сказать — Поблагодарить вас за то, что вы у меня есть 🩸

custom 53530731498249992097custom 53733438793386858644custom 52088690602210980653

17 Jul 2026, 22:03 UTC80 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

— Моргаф становится всё интереснее... #Моргаф

custom 53886333057824344354custom 52088690602210980653custom 53530731498249992093custom 52378201119134929682

15 Jul 2026, 04:27 UTC71 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Спойлер! Единицы из вас помнят «Моргаф». Маленький городок на окраине леса, про который ходят разные слухи. Впервые новость о нём появилась в 2024г. когда я решил нарисовать тот самый арт по Минсонам. Потом мне в очередной раз снесли аккаунт и Моргафа как и не было. Чтож, теперь появился повод продолжить эту историю, только с некоторыми изменениями. Скоро покажу результат, я на финишной прямой

custom 53530731498249992094custom 53551466140066196293custom 52088690602210980652

30 Jun 2026, 18:55 UTC91 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А помните....

custom 52088690602210980655custom 52378201119134929684custom 53530731498249992094custom 52061811880828887913

18 Jun 2026, 21:13 UTC128 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️— Nowkie — Вы есть в итд?

custom 52378201119134929684custom 53530731498249992094custom 52088690602210980652custom 53733438793386858642

10 Jun 2026, 22:33 UTC138 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🪦🪦🪦✨✨✨✨🪦🪦 🪦😱✨✨ ✨✨🤩🤩 🤩#Chan

custom 52378201119134929685custom 53530731498249992093custom 53709262078880126632custom 53733438793386858642

3 Jun 2026, 08:51 UTC139 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🅰️🅰️🅰️🤩🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🦋 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ ☠ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ #Chan

custom 53526305448552112162custom 53709262078880126632custom 53909807845825711152custom 53530731498249992091

23 May 2026, 04:55 UTC125 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Дорогие мои три калеки, сорян, что немного пропал на...МЕСЯЦ. Офигеть.. Я чуть чуть скис в плане артов из-за работы, но не брошу это дело, просто вдохновение перешло немного в другое направление и я не уверен, что вы хотите знать, в какое именно. Ничего серьёзного, просто шутка с моими друзьями переросла в то, что есть. Возможно в будущем я дам вам ссылку, а пока только арты🍑 Постараюсь взять себя в руки и что нибудь…

custom 53530731498249992094custom 53526305448552112162custom 53527793740619529871

9 Apr 2026, 15:09 UTC223 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

ВЫБИРАЕМ

  1. 157%
  2. 229%
  3. 350%
  4. 429%

The shares total 165%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 53530731498249992093custom 53527793740619529871

9 Apr 2026, 15:09 UTC189 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Хотите что-нибудь из этого?

custom 53530731498249992094

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Scandalous_Estate_Kris. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Apr 2026, 15:09 UTCFinal Results14 voters

ВЫБИРАЕМ

  1. 157%
  2. 229%
  3. 350%
  4. 429%

The shares total 165%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🥩𝐒𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐄𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞🥩” (@Scandalous_Estate_Kris), 73 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Scandalous_Estate_Kris.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.