Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

کلاهبرداری های ارز دیجیتال

@ScamAlertCryptoIran

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,791subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001908427062
TypeChannel
Username@ScamAlertCryptoIran
Descriptionمعرفی کلاهبرداری های ارز دیجیتال و چنل های تلگرامی ادمین جهت معرفی کلاهبرداران : @MrSpoter @mohamadjavad با مدارک کامل بفرستید به هیچ‌عنوان‌ تبلیغ و تبادل نداریم
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ScamAlertCryptoIran

Growth

9,7919,8089,799.57 August 2026 — 9,808 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,808 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,807 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,791 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,788–9,811 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 03:459,791-16
7 Aug 2026, 22:539,807-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:469,808no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:359,808first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 16 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
106
Videos
4
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,070 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍68864.3%
26224.5%
🔥847.85%
👏363.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,070reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2025 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Mar 2026, 18:48 UTC≈1,010 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🔴شدیدا مراقب کلاهبرداران فیلترشکن مجازی باشید 🔴 الان‌ اکثریت کانف فروش ها اسکمر هستن و یکیشونو خیلیا بهم معرفی کردن که کارای قانونیشو خودم انجام دادم ولی میزارم اطلاعاتشو ازش خرید نکنید و هر کی ازش اسکم شده شکایت کنه : آیدی کلاهبردار : ⭕️Saeed_filtering ⭕️ شماره کارت کلاهبردار 6063731260489175 رستگار کرمی و یه شماره کارت دیگه داره به نام عیسی محمدی هر کیم ازش کلاهبرداری کرده بیاد بهم بگه فردا صبح تمامی اصلاعاتشم

7👏3👍1🔥1

Signed Iran Musk

22 Dec 2025, 00:42 UTC≈2,220 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

این اتحادیه کاملا فیک هستش هیچ ربطی به اتحادیه ما نداره ماشالله همه زدن تو کار اتحادیه زدن اولین تاسیس کننده اتحادیه تو تلگرام ما بودیم این اتحادیم فیک هستش دوست دارم مدیرشم جواب منو بده دهنشو سرویس کنم دنبال بهونم ❤️‍🔥 تو در حدی نیسی پایین اونجا بنویسی باقیه اتحادیه ها فلانم گوخوریش به تو نیومده اوکی؟ دیگه از این گوها نبینم بخوری وگرنه با عمل بهت نشون میدم

👍183

Signed ᴹᴹᴰ ᴶᴬⱽᴬᴰ

9 Dec 2025, 20:46 UTC≈2,890 views43 reactionsread 13 August 2026

این یه اخطار تا رسیدگی کنه رسیدگی نشه داخل کل چنلای مالی بنر میشه از این به بعد اینجوری پیش میره اتحادیه چند نفر بنر بشن بقیه هم رعایت میکنن تا تو این محیط کلاهبرداری نکنن

👍35🔥62

Signed ᴹᴹᴰ ᴶᴬⱽᴬᴰ

9 Dec 2025, 20:43 UTC≈2,690 views46 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

❗کانال تلگرامی متین کریپتو کلاهبردار هستش طبق قانون 1 اتحادیه مالی ترید درصدی ترید شخصی کاملا کلاهبرداری هستش و این شخص حدود ۱ سالی هست کلی سرمایه از مردمو لیکویید کرده و هنوزم داره به کارش ادامه میده ک تاحالا کلی شکایتی هم داشته چنلشو اسپم و لفت بدین #اتحادیه_مالی

👍365🔥4👏1

Signed ᴹᴹᴰ ᴶᴬⱽᴬᴰ

9 Nov 2025, 14:41 UTC≈9,010 views72 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

این مادرجنده رو ببین خدایی! نمیدونم خوده طلوعی بیناموسه یا چنل فیکشو زدن خلاصه فرقی نداره هر دو بیناموس حساب میشن! این عکسی که گذاشته هزار دلار رو کرده چهار هزار دلار سایت 1xbet هست یعنی سایت شرطبندیه حتی سایت ترید هم نیست!😂😂 حاجی نرید گول اینو بخورید آبرومونو ببریدا! ممبرای این چنل نباید گول این چیزارو بخورن!

54👍15🔥3

Signed Iran Musk

1 Sept 2025, 22:49 UTC≈5,350 views101 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🎲عزیزان فردا یه نوع کلاهبرداری نوین که الان بیشتر چنلا دارن با این روش کلاه مردمو برمیدارن رو بهتون کامل میگم!

57👍28🔥9👏7

Signed Iran Musk

10 Jul 2025, 13:38 UTC≈7,510 views79 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🟥مراقب این دسته از کلاهبرداری ها باشید دوستان🟥

55👍19👏3🔥2

Signed 𝐇𝐚𝐣𝒜𝓁𝒾

11 Jun 2025, 16:00 UTC≈8,950 views59 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ترید درصدی = SCAM ⛔️ طبق آرا و نتیجه به دست آمده بین مالکین محترم چنلای ارزی ترید درصدی تو سال های گذشته 99% ضرر به مردم بوده 🔴 ❗️تقصیر شخص کانال دار هم نبوده اشتباه فردی ، اینترنت ، انلاین نبودن فرد ، ریزش و پامپای ناگهانی و ..... و از این لحظه به بعد اگه در چنلی بنر عضوگیری ترید درصدی دیدین سریع لفت بدین چون 99% اسکم هستش هيچگونه سودی در ترید درصدی وجود نداره 🔖به همین دلیل مالکین محترم اتحادیه Finance Billioner

👍4513👏1

13 May 2025, 17:11 UTC≈8,470 views52 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

کلاهبرداران عزیز زدن توی کار تحلیل منطقه 😄

🔥31👍138

Signed 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐌𝐞𝐡𝐝𝐢

10 May 2025, 17:04 UTC≈8,740 views47 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ کلاهبردار ⚠️ ❗️پامپ و دامپ شت کوین ❗️

👍336🔥6👏2

Signed -𝗔𝗠𝗜𝗥𝗛𝗢𝗦𝗘𝗜𝗡

10 May 2025, 17:04 UTC≈6,300 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ کلاهبردار ⚠️ ❗️پامپ و دامپ شت کوین ❗️

👍305

Signed -𝗔𝗠𝗜𝗥𝗛𝗢𝗦𝗘𝗜𝗡

10 May 2025, 17:04 UTC≈6,050 views38 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ کلاهبردار ⚠️ ❗️پامپ و دامپ شت کوین ❗️

👍22👏95🔥2

Signed -𝗔𝗠𝗜𝗥𝗛𝗢𝗦𝗘𝗜𝗡

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ScamAlertCryptoIran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 993,152 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کلاهبرداری های ارز دیجیتال” (@ScamAlertCryptoIran), 9,791 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ScamAlertCryptoIran.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.