Portfolio management service 🔥

Channel
Scalping kings
@Scalping_Kings_BTC
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
97,408subscribers
+42,508 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001305078987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Scalping_Kings_BTC |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Scalping_Kings_BTC |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:04 | 97,408 | -3,107 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:59 | 100,515 | -673 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:47 | 101,188 | -819 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 01:09 | 102,007 | -639 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 01:20 | 102,646 | -1,108 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:31 | 103,754 | -144 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:47 | 103,898 | -963 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:11 | 104,861 | -939 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:20 | 105,800 | -1,327 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:29 | 107,127 | -1,349 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:30 | 108,476 | +3,823 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 05:16 | 104,653 | +5,469 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:10 | 99,184 | +6,336 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:54 | 92,848 | -1,528 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:28 | 94,376 | -852 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:06 | 95,228 | -3,337 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:44 | 98,565 | -6,513 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:00 | 105,078 | -2,304 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:54 | 107,382 | -1,960 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 109,342 | first reading |
Engagement
487 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 487 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 42s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#ETH 🚀
#BTC 🚀
$ETH Net buying is continue. Although weaker than yesterday, the continuation of the net buying trend is a positive signal. Currently, buying pressure on Coinbase is increasing rapidly.
$BTC net buying is increasing further. Although weaker than yesterday, net buying is still taking place. In particular, buying pressure in the futures market is strong.
Hyperliquid whales still hold more short positions. There are short whales who have not yet given up. When they declare given up, the rally will accelerate even further.
The short-term buy wall for $XRP is at $1.20, and the next buy wall is at $1.10
$XRP is showing some selling pressure following the rise. Due to the current decline, a significant amount of high-leverage long positions are likely being liquidated.
$XRP is approaching the first sell wall. The current rise is high likely to stop at that sell wall. It appears that $XRP will pause briefly in that zone, after that continuing its rise.
$ETH whale sell walls exist at $2400, $2450, $2500, and $2700.
The $XRP Open Interest (OI) and Net Position Delta are increasing simultaneously. Real upward pressure is occurring. Buying pressure in the futures market is increasing further.
$XRP whale sell walls exist at $2.27 and $2.5. There is still ample upside potential. There is no whale resistance.
Showing the 12 most recent of 487 posts we hold for @Scalping_Kings_BTC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @Scalping_Kings_BTC as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 7.3 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Scalping kings” (@Scalping_Kings_BTC), 97,408 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Scalping_Kings_BTC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.