Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
20 measurements spanning 24 days, net -358. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,864–16,330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 14:20
15,918
-47
7 Sept 2026, 12:02
15,965
-38
4 Sept 2026, 17:57
16,003
-15
3 Sept 2026, 00:07
16,018
-11
1 Sept 2026, 23:46
16,029
-12
31 Aug 2026, 23:34
16,041
-15
30 Aug 2026, 21:34
16,056
-13
30 Aug 2026, 01:03
16,069
-17
28 Aug 2026, 21:36
16,086
-11
28 Aug 2026, 00:46
16,097
-13
27 Aug 2026, 04:11
16,110
-20
26 Aug 2026, 05:07
16,130
-12
25 Aug 2026, 05:33
16,142
-17
24 Aug 2026, 03:16
16,159
-42
22 Aug 2026, 11:13
16,201
-28
20 Aug 2026, 23:17
16,229
-14
19 Aug 2026, 22:52
16,243
-16
19 Aug 2026, 00:04
16,259
-17
18 Aug 2026, 03:12
16,276
no change
18 Aug 2026, 02:15
16,276
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 15,918 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
25 (25 April 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
11,765
Reactions total
303
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,231 reactions across 25 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
473
38.4%
👍
249
20.2%
😁
127
10.3%
🔥
81
6.58%
😱
76
6.17%
🤣
47
3.82%
👏
43
3.49%
🤷♂
42
3.41%
😭
21
1.71%
🤔
20
1.62%
🙏
12
0.975%
🥰
10
0.812%
😢
6
0.487%
🗿
4
0.325%
🦄
4
0.325%
🙈
3
0.244%
🫡
3
0.244%
🤷
2
0.162%
🌚
1
0.081%
👀
1
0.081%
6 further kinds
6
0.487%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,231 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Participer à des activités nouvelles est l’une des meilleures façons de stimuler notre cerveau.
De plus, interagir avec des personnes plus intelligentes que nous peut également être très bénéfique pour le développement de nos capacités.
✔️Rejoignez SavoirInspire pour en savoir plus !
Saviez-vous que… ? Malgré sa petite taille, la mante religieuse est capable d’attaquer des prédateurs beaucoup plus grands qu’elle. 😳
✔️Rejoignez SavoirInspire pour en savoir plus !
🤖 Saviez-vous que la possibilité qu’une intelligence artificielle devienne consciente n’est pas totalement exclue ?
En 2026, les scientifiques ne savent toujours pas exactement d’où vient la conscience humaine ni comment elle apparaît dans notre cerveau.
✔️Rejoignez SavoirInspire pour en savoir plus !
Van Gogh a tenté de se suicider en se tirant une balle dans la poitrine avec un revolver. La balle n’a pas atteint son cœur, alors il est rentré chez lui et s’est couché.
Il a vécu deux jours de plus avant de mourir à l’âge de 37 ans, sans avoir connu la reconnaissance pour son œuvre. Seules quelques personnes ont assisté à ses funérailles.
✔️Rejoignez SavoirInspire pour en savoir plus !
Ceci n’est pas une scène d’un nouveau film d’horreur ni une création d’IA ; c’est une créature bien réelle, fièrement représentante de la faune brésilienne : le loup à crinière 🐺.
💬 Vous rentrez chez vous le soir et vous tombez sur ça. Vous faites quoi ?
✔️Rejoignez SavoirInspire pour en savoir plus !
Quand on a demandé au créateur des Minions si les Minions étaient des hommes ou des femmes, sa réponse était pour le moins inattendue…
Selon lui, les Minions sont bien évidemment des hommes Parce que les femmes ne sont pas aussi stupides 🤪
✔️Rejoignez SavoirInspire pour en savoir plus !
😅 Faire une petite maladresse peut te rendre plus sympathique aux yeux des autres.
On appelle ça "l'effet pratfall" : une personne compétente qui trébuche légèrement paraît plus humaine et plus proche… tant que l'erreur reste mineure.
✔️Rejoignez SavoirInspire pour en savoir plus !
😳 Le déjà-vu n'est pas un vrai souvenir.
C'est en général ton cerveau qui traite l'information une fraction de seconde trop tard… et la classe par erreur comme "déjà vécue".
Ça dure rarement plus de quelques secondes.
✔️Rejoignez SavoirInspire pour en savoir plus !
🧍♂️ Nous sommes de plus en plus seuls.
En 1990, seulement 3 % des Américains disaient n’avoir aucun ami proche. En 2024, ils étaient 17 %. De plus, ce phénomène ne semble pas être limité aux États-Unis. Et les moins de 50 ans sont aujourd’hui bien plus susceptibles d’être solitaires que les plus âgés.
✔️Rejoignez SavoirInspire pour en savoir plus !
🎋 Le bambou chinois met 5 ans avant de sortir de terre.
On raconte souvent cette image en développement personnel : pendant 4 ans, on l'arrose, on s'en occupe, et rien ne semble se passer en surface. Puis, à la 5e année, il pousse de plus de 20 mètres en quelques semaines.
En réalité, pendant ces 4 années, la plante construit un système racinaire capable de soutenir cette croissance explosive.
@SavoirInspire 🌱
SavoirInspire est de retour. 📚
Ça faisait un moment. J’ai été beaucoup moins constant que je ne l’aurais voulu avec SavoirInspire, et je préfère être honnête avec vous plutôt que de faire comme si de rien n’était. Vous êtes plus de 16 000 à faire partie de cette communauté, vous méritez mieux que des silences de plusieurs semaines.
Et pour reprendre… Saviez-vous que notre cerveau déteste le vide ?
Nous ne pouvons p…
Un Égyptien prenant un selfie avec le portrait d'un Égyptien datant de 2000 ans.
🤯
@SavoirInspire #History📚
🤷♂37❤14👍14😱6😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @SavoirInspire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
LE MONDE DE L'HISTOIRE 📚 @Histoire_Univers · 27,871 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 7 here — alongside 6 others — read 10 September 2026
BLAK 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗢💯💯 @MAX72_PRONOS · 32,838 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 12 here — alongside 11 others — read 4 September 2026
BONUS CASINO @babelseypro235 · 44,453 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 14 here — alongside 13 others — read 27 August 2026
🥎 Mr 𝐂𝐀𝐍𝐃𝐘𝐒 🥎 @mr_candys · 65,315 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 23 here — alongside 22 others — read 27 August 2026
FILMS & SERIE 2024 🎬 @FILMSSERIE2024 · 35,366 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 2 September 2026
⚽️Actu-Foot Zone fR 🇫🇷 @ActuFootZoneFr · 84,765 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SavoirInspire 📖💭” (@SavoirInspire), 15,918 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SavoirInspire.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.