Channel
@SaskiaLudwigCDU
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002703203246 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SaskiaLudwigCDU |
| Description | Mitglied des Deutschen Bundestages |
| Created | 12 August 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SaskiaLudwigCDU |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 2 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 2 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 12 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Minimalanforderungen: Nicht mehr und nicht weniger! 1) Jeder Name eines potentiellen Kandidaten für das Bundesverfassungsgericht wird rechtzeitig vor der Wahl gegenüber den Mitgliedern der CDU/CSU-Bundestagsfraktion transparent kommuniziert 2) Jeder Kandidat (auch wenn es sich um einen „der CDU nahestehenden Kandidaten“ handelt) stellt sich in der CDU/CSU-Bundestagsfraktion vor 3) Jeder Kandidat (bspw. die aktuell v…
Warum ist der Fraktion BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN nur der Teilaspekt „Corona-Masken“ so wichtig und kein vollumfänglicher CORONA-Untersuchungsausschuss im Deutschen Bundestag? Woran könnte das wohl liegen? „Grüne schicken 90 Fragen“ zeit.de/politik/deutsc…
https://www.welt.de/debatte/article688ca677e7eecf6540a86fe7/nahost-wenn-wir-israel-verraten-verraten-wir-uns-selbst.html
https://t.co/pnsruxEJ6G
Tag 19 - Verfassungsrichter sollen in ihrem Wirken das Volk repräsentieren - und nicht wie die Professorin aus Potsdam sich selbst! Wer aus den Paragrafen der Verfassung eine CORONA-Impfpflicht ableitet ist unwählbar!
Mad Miersch! Eine Professorin aus Potsdam, die eine Impfpflicht aus dem Grundgesetz herleitete und Zwangsmaßnahmen gegen Nicht-Geimpfte forderte, als längst die eingeschränkte Wirkungsweise und mögliche Nebenwirkungen diskutiert wurden, ist nicht wählbar! spiegel.de/politik/deutsc…
Zu keinem Zeitpunkt waren die Bürger, die sich nicht dem Diktat einer COVID-Impfung unterworfen haben, eine Bedrohung für die vermeintlich „freiwillig Geimpften“.
Wer die TABELLE der @faznet erhalten möchte, wende sich bitte direkt an die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (Red. Berlin), um die Persönlichkeitsrechte des freien Mitarbeiters der FAZ zu wahren. Jeder kann sich so sein eigenes Bild machen! publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/fron… @altenbockum
Jeder Bürger hat die Möglichkeit, sich die Ausführungen des Ehepaars Gersdorf mit dem Titel „Allgemeine Impfpflicht gegen COVID-19-Virus verstößt nicht gegen die Verfassung“ auf der Webseite der Universität Potsdam anzuschauen. uni-potsdam.de/fileadmin/proj…
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @SaskiaLudwigCDU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 389,767 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SaskiaLudwigCDU named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Saskia Ludwig” (@SaskiaLudwigCDU), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SaskiaLudwigCDU.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.