Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 41 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69–80 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 00:40
70
-1
10 Sept 2026, 17:41
71
-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:49
72
-7
9 Aug 2026, 19:32
79
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:11
79
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 16 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
123 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5253840700704848108
37
30.1%
👍
31
25.2%
custom 5364235490654452043
15
12.2%
❤
15
12.2%
custom 5429269365759435574
14
11.4%
custom 5438211869921805121
9
7.32%
custom 5337303756490957158
2
1.63%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2025 to 9 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
на днях я заметил ебучий пост от черномазой обезьянки сракимовской которая после отсоса моего хуя решила искать какие-то оправдания мой хуй просто ахуел от того насколько нелепые отмазки нашёл на свою пизду этот слабонервный сыночек шалавы ебучий которому я по классике жанра плевал в сосалище черномазой падали ебаной ещё раз повторю которая на моем половом междуножном кинжале недавно копыта отбросила я разоблачу кажд…
откровенно по устоявшемуся канону вся квинтэссенция в рыло сынульки шалавы захарканного в пыль стертого который несколько суток тщился на моем половом междуножном кинжале выстоять в итоге отшвырнул свое сосалище наглухо запечатав свою харю не проявляя ни малейшей активности с моего члена сука
раскрошил полностью рожу сынульки шалавы чернозадой который свое сосалище откинул на моем члене в ту ночь ровно в два часа ночи сука и пару минут а по сути все началось с того что мой межбедренный хуй вошел в черное сосало терпилы ебливой которая прямо скажем решилась на моем хую выебоны крутить заявляя нахуй что каждый мой напор она в силах перешибить будет ну и в сущности мой хуй тут же начал перебивать каждый мухт…
всё что было зашвырнуто в сосальце сынка шельмы в разномастных беседах и личных переписках где шалавашка всё откровенно вытерпела низвергнувшись в помрачение
сокрушил абсолютно каждую остеоструктуру черномазой петушне инфернальной что восседала на клинке половом чисто мерзопакостный сыночек шельмы который вознамерился мой фаллос феллировать выпендриваясь говнотролльными выкрутасами ну и собственно я своим хуём начал в черное сосалище шалавашки метать гастрономические субстанции прямо декламируя покуда его ебасос не разорвался и он мою залупу из конференции не изгнал а зат…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @SarcophHes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Σαρκοφάγος τοῦ Ἡσυχαστοῦ” (@SarcophHes), 70 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SarcophHes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
