Gua izin off beberapa hari ye, nitip ternak-ternak di mari.
🫡37
Signed Rendra Pangestu.

Channel
@SapiSigma
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002175605429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SapiSigma |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SapiSigma |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 1 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 1 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 27 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
529 reactions across 9 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤩 | 72 | 13.6% | |
| 🫡 | 62 | 11.7% | |
| 😎 | 59 | 11.2% | |
| 🤗 | 47 | 8.88% | |
| custom 5442600484684704003 | 37 | 6.99% | |
| custom 5444958318650993427 | 37 | 6.99% | |
| 😍 | 35 | 6.62% | |
| 🤓 | 27 | 5.10% | |
| 🤪 | 25 | 4.73% | |
| 😘 | 23 | 4.35% | |
| 🤣 | 22 | 4.16% | |
| 🥴 | 20 | 3.78% | |
| 😨 | 19 | 3.59% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 2.27% | |
| 😭 | 12 | 2.27% | |
| 😱 | 11 | 2.08% | |
| 🤨 | 7 | 1.32% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.378% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 529 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2024 to 14 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Gua izin off beberapa hari ye, nitip ternak-ternak di mari.
🫡37
Signed Rendra Pangestu.
Selamat datang di dunia yang fana ini, Alexandra.
🤩15😎12😭12😍5🤓4🤗4🥴4😨3
Obrolan santai bareng Bapak Indosat yang ga bisa nyantai.
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ ㅤㅤ ► ──ㅤKandang Sapi ㅤㅤㅤ10 Februari —2025 ㅤ
ㅤ Syukur tiada henti terucap di hati. Malam ini, kehidupan baru telah lahir di kandang sederhana, selamat dan sehat tanpa kurang satu apa pun. Tuhan masih berbaik hati, memberi kepercayaan kepada Penggembala untuk merawat makhluk kecil yang kini tengah menghirup udara dunia. Induknya telah berjuang semalaman, dan kini ia beristirahat dengan tenang, sementara anaknya yang mungil mulai belajar menyusu, mencari kekuatan…
Banyak yang belum tahu kalau anak babi itu punya sisi emosional yang kuat. Jika mereka terbiasa mendapat perhatian dan tiba-tiba diabaikan, mereka bisa menunjukkan tanda-tanda "merajuk," seperti menjauh, mengeluarkan suara keluhan pelan, atau bahkan menolak makan sebentar. Mereka sangat friendly dan butuh interaksi, baik dengan induknya, saudara-saudaranya, maupun manusia jika dibesarkan bersama manusia. Jadi, jangan…
🤪25🤣22🤓18😨11🤗10😱8🤨7😎5
Signed @kPerca Rendra Pangestu.
ⓘ Momen Spesial; Pencapaian DuaRatusJutaSakribir. Terima kasih untuk setiap Warga yang sudah menjadi bagian dari perjalanan ini. Kepercayaan, semangat, dan kebersamaan kalian adalah alasan kenapa Peternakan Maju Jaya bisa tumbuh dan berkembang. Semoga Peternakan ini terus menjadi tempat yang positif, saling mendukung, dan membawa manfaat bagi semua Warganya. Mari kita rayak…
🤩15🤗12😎12🥴6😍3😘3🫡2
Signed @kPerca Rendra Pangestu.
Rendra Pangestu; seorang penggembala muda yang tinggal di pedesaan dengan hamparan padang rumput luas sebagai tempat ia menggiring binatang ternaknya setiap hari. Dengan topi anyaman khas petani yang selalu bertengger di kepalanya dan seutas rumput yang sering dikunyah santai, Rendra tampak seperti penggembala biasa. Namun, di balik kesibukannya menjaga ternak, ia memiliki hobi unik—bermain game Hay Day. Di sela-sela…
😎16🤩14😍13😁12
Photo, posted without a caption
🤩14😍14🥴10🤗8😘6🤓5🫡5😨5
Dikarenakan sebentar lagi diadakannya Panen Raya dan membutuhkan banyak tenaga dari para pemuda berbadan bugar, Penggembala akan berpartisipasi untuk ikut bergotong royong. Penggembala meminta tolong untuk menjaga ternak sementara waktu, ya? Terimakasih, Penggembala sangat terbantu atas kebaikan kalian!
🫡18🤗12😘11🤩10😎8
📝 Penggembala sedang merasa gundah gulana, bolehkah minta kata-kata terbaik dari kalian, Warga? Untuk mengabsen juga siapa yang sedang diving Bhuana Kakarauri. @melodphi: semangat tuan pengembala, harus selalu semangat biar nanti hewan ternaknya nambah jadi ada naga ㅤㅤ .۶ৎ 𓈒 @yorchids: .۶ৎ 𓈒 semangat selalu memelihara kambing na sapimu ya tuan 609. Hectic @Penyeka: #dawson semangat terus ternak sapi, jangan lupa …
🤩2😎2🤗1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @SapiSigma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SapiSigma named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Peternakan Maju Jaya” (@SapiSigma), 1 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SapiSigma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.