СамСебеАгроном pinned a video

Channel
СамСебеАгроном
@SamSebeAgronom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,347subscribers
-36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001815737182 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SamSebeAgronom |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SamSebeAgronom |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 31,347 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 31,350 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 31,352 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 31,354 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 31,365 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 31,369 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 31,367 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 21:20 | 31,370 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 31,370 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 31,368 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 31,372 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 31,374 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 31,379 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 31,381 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 31,383 | first reading |
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.11%
- avg views ÷ 31,347 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,230
- 38 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.92%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 39
- of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (7 August 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 84,752 |
| Reactions total | 4,170 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 8h 07m
- Average length
- 17m 24s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,170 reactions across 38 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,296 | 55.1% | |
| ❤ | 1,045 | 25.1% | |
| 🔥 | 643 | 15.4% | |
| 👏 | 84 | 2.01% | |
| 🤩 | 73 | 1.75% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 0.12% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.096% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.096% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 0.072% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.072% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.072% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.072% | |
| 🎅 | 2 | 0.048% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 0.048% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,170reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 38 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SamSebeAgronom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.56%
- 1 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 2,310
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 2,440
- over 37 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqvviSj5 | 1 | 7 August 2026 | 7 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 21 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Обзор томатов и что делаем после сбора урожая. Друзья, увлечённые цветоводы, садоводы и огородники, а также гости канала ЗДРАВСТВУЙТЕ!!!🖐. Сегодня в выпуске - #томаты и #обзор на то, что выросло у нас в этом году. Что-то мне нравится, а что-то нет. Есть томаты просто отвал всего, а есть - бесполезная трата денег и времени. Помимо обзора «вкусно-не вкусно», делюсь с вами и полезными рекомендациями - что нужно сделать…
❤23❤🔥1👍1
Signed Константин Сапожников
Закончил материал про томаты. Сейчас буду выкладывать😉. Так же в видео будут полезные подсказки по подготовки теплиц и открытого грунта после сбора урожая и результат применения микоризы на томатах!
👍37
Signed Константин Сапожников
А это было/стало. Разница в фото 1 месяц.
👍48🔥24❤10👏4
Signed Константин Сапожников
Друзья, всем добрый вечер! Решил посмотреть черенки и компост спустя три дня после закладки опыта😉. И вот результат уже перед вами♥️. Я напомню, что 18 августа я пролил черенки одной новиночкой для себя, а так же компост ускорителем компостирования, а как это было посмотрите тут 👉 https://t.me/SamSebeAgronom/6559
👍38❤7🔥3
Signed Константин Сапожников
Сегодня Александра Николавна решила вас побаловать фотографиями из нашей рубрики «глазами фотографа» Жду ваших реакций внизу♥️👍🔥
🔥92👍18❤12👏3🤩1
Signed Константин Сапожников
А сейчас, пойдёмте покормим розы, голубику, да и весь сад в целом😉. Заодно покажу, что сейчас и как с розами, газонам и морковь🤣!
❤50🔥20👍8
Signed Константин Сапожников
Доброго вечера! Мы находимся: Московская область. Щелковский район, рп. Фряново, ул. Победы, д. 1 А. Точка геолокации и места встречи на карте 👉56.136969,38.437589 https://yandex.ru/navi?whatshere%5Bzoom%5D=19&whatshere%5Bpoint%5D=38.437589,56.136969&si=mgqc7v3w7v19u977umvk466jc0 От Москвы к нам можно добраться: 1️⃣ От м.Щелковская Автобус 335 (Фряново-Москва). 2️⃣ Ярославский вокзал. Электричка до станции Щёлков…
❤22
Signed Константин Сапожников
Друзья мои! Для тех, кто всё таки хочет приехать к нам в гости в эту субботу, 22 августа, возможно заранее запланировали билеты/проживание - мы с удовольствием примем всех. Но, будет дождь, поэтому одевайтесь и обувайтесь по погоде! Так же особо показать сейчас нечего, 70% роз на бутонах, и лишь единицы цветут. Так что в субботу я буду на участке, всех встречу, со всеми пообщаюсь, а на 5 сентября приму остальных. Ду…
❤35🔥9
Signed Константин Сапожников
Друзья мои, всем добрейшего денечка! Записал вам видео, где осветил несколько важных вопросов: 1️⃣ обрезка и уход за малиной и ежевикой после сбора урожая и подготовка к зиме. 2️⃣ переносим день открытых дверей на пару недель, розы и сад не готовы - ничего ещё толком не распустились и не зацвело 3️⃣ цветы экспо, про это тоже немного проговорил😉. Посмотрите и послушайте прикрепленное видео, там всё подробно и деталь…
👍44❤6
Signed Константин Сапожников
Друзья мои, съездил сейчас в ПВЗ СДЕК, забрал посылки😉. Делюсь с вами интересностями♥️.
👍47❤15
Signed Константин Сапожников
Друзья мои, я с вами «по миру пойду» 🤣🤣🤣. Итак, тема РН набирает обороты и самый частый вопрос за эти пол года - какой прибор выбрать. Сегодня утром я проснулся с мыслью и решил: нам нужнее обзор тестеров для воды и почвы. Поэтому я зашел на маркет млейс, заказал всяких разных ( от 200 рублей, до… ценой шокировать не буду😉) и мы сделаем видео на эту тему🙏. Надеюсь будет очень интересно, ну во всяком случае лично мне…
❤61👍31🔥11👏7
Signed Константин Сапожников
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @SamSebeAgronom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,043,847 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@LudmilaKudasova · 60,261
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
@ired_cap · 159,732
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
@sadovyygidlarisa · 100,088
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
@zacvetet · 104,403
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
@BestGryadka · 94,881
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СамСебеАгроном” (@SamSebeAgronom), 31,347 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SamSebeAgronom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.