Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سالم بن شعبان الغرياني

Channel

سالم بن شعبان الغرياني

@SalembinShaabanAlGhariani

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,126subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001787373449
TypeChannel
Username@SalembinShaabanAlGhariani
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SalembinShaabanAlGhariani

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1211,1351,1286 August 2026 — 1,134 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,134 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,135 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,134 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,133 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,132 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,133 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,131 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,128 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,127 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,124 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,126 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,121 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,126 subscribers1,1266 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,119–1,137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:371,126+5
15 Sept 2026, 04:211,121-5
7 Sept 2026, 00:001,126+2
2 Sept 2026, 01:521,124-3
30 Aug 2026, 08:361,127-1
27 Aug 2026, 13:091,128-3
24 Aug 2026, 21:061,131-2
21 Aug 2026, 07:571,133+1
18 Aug 2026, 18:231,132-1
15 Aug 2026, 18:231,133-1
12 Aug 2026, 08:351,134-1
9 Aug 2026, 17:421,135+1
6 Aug 2026, 09:381,134no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:511,134first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

142 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12084.5%
2014.1%
21.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC348 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

َا الْوَجْهِ مِنْ حَدِيثِ أَبِي أُسَامَةَ عَنْ دَاوُدَ الْأَوْدِيِّ. الحديث الثاني: (مبهم) وهو حديثنا المنشود: 3070 - حَدَّثَنَا الْفَضْلُ بْنُ الصَّبَّاحِ الْبَغْدَادِيُّ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ الْأَوْدِيِّ، عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ، عَنْ عَلْقَمَةَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ قَالَ: «مَنْ سَرَّهُ أَنْ يَنْظُرَ إِلَى الصَّحِيفَةِ...» الحديث. وقال عقبه: هَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ غَرِيبٌ. الحديث الثالث: (

👍21

2 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC370 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

يوخ داود بن عبد الله، وذكروه في شيوخ ابن يزيد. قال الإمام البخاري في «التاريخ الكبير» (3/ 236)، (802) في ترجمة داود بن عبد الله: روى عن حميد بن عبد الرحمن الحميري. روى عنه أبو عوانة وأبو خالد الدالاني. وقال في ترجمة داود بن يزيد (816): سمع أباه، والشعبي. سمع منه وكيع. وقال ابن أبي حاتم في «الجرح والتعديل» (3/ 416)، (1903): "داود بن عبد الله الأودي أبو العلاء الكوفي. روى عن حميد بن عبد الرحمن الحميري ووبرة. روى عنه أب

👍41

2 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC426 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

بن أبي عبد الله) وهو مولى بني هاشم، فقد وقع له عند الترمذي في الجامع حديث واحد. ومما يذكر هنا -أيضا- وهو محل سؤال واستغراب -والله أعلم- صنيع المزي في تحفة الأشراف حيث إنه ميز روايات الراويين في كل المواضع التي خرجها فأما داود بن عبد الله فذكر له سبعة أحاديث: «3601»، «10407»، «11902»، «15553»، «15554»، «15555»، «15556» ليس فيها من الرواية عن الشعبي شيء؛ بل لم أقف على حديث واحد لداود بن عبد الله الأودي مصرحا به عن الشع

👍91

2 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC388 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم الحمد لله والصلاة والسلام على رسول الله وعلى آله وصحبه ومن والاه. أما بعد: فقد وقفت على كلمة لأحد طلبة العلم الدعاة عندنا في ليبيا -حرسها الله- حول شرف أصحاب الحديث، وقد استهل كلمته -وفقه الله- بقصة لم يذكر إسنادها، بين الشيخين الجليلين: (مقبل بن هادي الوادعي، ومحمد على آدم الإثيوبي) -رحمهما الله- ونص كلامه بعد حمد الله والصلاة على نبيه -صلى الله عليه وسلم-: "أما بعد: فاستفتح كلمتي هذه بقصه وقع

3👍2

2 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC321 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

الشيخ الألباني -رحمه الله- وهو الصواب لعدة قرائن: الأولى: أن الإمام الدارقطني -رحمه الله- تكلم عن هذا الحديث بعينه كما جاء في «أطراف الغرائب والأفراد» (2/ 30) ترتيب ابن القيسراني، حديث رقم: (3821) «من سره أَن ينظر إِلَى وَصِيَّة مُحَمَّد -صلى الله عليه وسلم-…» الحَدِيث. قال الدارقطني: تفرد بِهِ دَاوُد بن يزِيد الأودي عَن الشّعبِيّ، وَتفرد بِهِ مُحَمَّد بن فُضَيْل عَنهُ. والدارقطني إمام متخصص في العلل وتمييز الرواة و

👍21

5 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,040 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

قال العلامة حمود التويجري -رحمه الله-: العقل في باب الحب والبغض والموالاة والمعاداة عقلان: أحدهما: عقل مسدد موفق قاهر للهوى والنفس الأمارة بالسوء، قد استنار بنور الإيمان، وصار الحاكم عليه كتاب الله وسنة رسوله ﷺ، فهذا العقل يقتضي من أصحابه ألا يقدموا على طاعة الله تعالى وطاعة رسوله ﷺ شيئًا أبدًا، ويقتضي من أصحابه أن يحبوا في الله ويبغضوا في الله، ويوالوا في الله ويعادوا في الله، ويعطوا لله ويمنعوا لله، ويسارعوا إلى ك

👍85

12 Jun 2026, 07:00 UTC786 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

وَالعِلْمُ يَدْخُلُ قَلْبَ كُلِّ مُوَفَّقٍ مِنْ غَيْرِ بَوَّابٍ وَلَا اسْتئْذَانِ وَيرُدُّهُ المَحْرُومُ مِنْ خِذْلَانِهِ لَا تُشْقِنَا اللَّهُمَّ بالحِرْمَانِ #ابن_القيم https://t.me/SalembinShaabanAlGhariani

👍13

3 Jun 2026, 00:08 UTC966 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

الله -تعالى ذكرُه- جعَل بلطفه الكلامَ بين خلقِه رحمةً منه بهم، ليُبِينَ بعضُهم لبعضٍ عمَّا في ضمائرِهم مما لا تُحِسُّه أبصارُهم. تفسير الطبري (15/ 350) https://t.me/SalembinShaabanAlGhariani

👍8

21 May 2026, 02:15 UTC≈1,090 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

كثير من الناس منبهرون بـ #الذكاء_الاصطناعي وقد غفل منهم من غفل عن أنّ كل ما في الكون من صنع اللطيف الخبير الذي {عَلَّمَ الْإِنسَانَ مَا لَمْ يَعْلَمْ} {وَاللَّهُ خَلَقَكُمْ وَمَا تَعْمَلُونَ} {فَتَبَارَكَ اللَّهُ أَحْسَنُ الْخَالِقِينَ}. https://t.me/SalembinShaabanAlGhariani

👍832

19 May 2026, 06:46 UTC≈1,210 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

#سلسلة_الكلمات •الكليمة العشرون بـعنوان: « من معاني أسماء الله وصفاته » • الشيخ: سالم بن شعبان الغرياني -حفظه الله ورعاه- • https://t.me/SalembinShaabanAlGhariani • 🔄

👍5

19 May 2026, 05:43 UTC748 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

قال الشعبي -رحمه الله-: «زَيْنُ الْعِلْمِ حِلْمُ أَهْلِهِ» مصنف ابن أبي شيبة (٢٧٢٧٩) https://t.me/SalembinShaabanAlGhariani

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SalembinShaabanAlGhariani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قناة ليبيا التأصيلية 🇱🇾
@libya_salafy · 33,309
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سالم بن شعبان الغرياني” (@SalembinShaabanAlGhariani), 1,126 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SalembinShaabanAlGhariani.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.