Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ali Saleck

Channel

Ali Saleck

@Saleckca

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,201subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001388303399
TypeChannel
Username@Saleckca
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Saleckca

Growth

2,1962,2022,1996 August 2026 — 2,196 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,196 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,202 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,201 subscribers2,2016 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,195–2,203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:262,201-1
9 Aug 2026, 23:342,202+6
6 Aug 2026, 18:152,196no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:072,196first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 23 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.6%
avg views ÷ 2,201 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,180
1 post measured
Reaction rate
8.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held16 (23 December 202528 July 2026)
Views total1,180
Reactions total100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,615 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,19273.8%
🕊23114.3%
🔥16210.0%
👍231.42%
👎70.433%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,615reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,180 views100 reactionsread 7 August 2026

روی ساختمونای بلند یه آیینه بذارید شاید خدا خودشو دید و غصه اش گرفت

🕊906👍4

12 Jul 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,400 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

51🕊9🔥2👎1

28 Jun 2026, 20:24 UTC≈2,340 views99 reactionsread 7 August 2026

کام از سیگار ولی دود از جیگر

77🕊18🔥3👍1

22 Jun 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,790 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥4613🕊3

22 Jun 2026, 13:20 UTC≈2,260 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Check out Yasin.mohebiii on #SoundCloud https://on.soundcloud.com/cSEAcmNjce1PfyYwlT

33🕊4

22 Jun 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,600 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مجموعه[جغد] منتشرشد شعر و اجرا : یاسین محبی اهنگساز : علی سالک طراح جلد : الف ( Joghd ) Rapper : yasin_mohebii prod by : saleck Cover art : alef

39🕊3

15 Jun 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,590 views186 reactionsread 7 August 2026

چند ماهی میشه که نه چیزی نوشتم نه چیزی ساختم و این برای منی که همیشه یکی دو تا کار آماده داشتم یجورایی دور از ذهن، ولی حس میکنم اشتباه نبوده و بابتش پشیمون نیستم، هرموقع ام میام که بیخیال شم و بگم خب تمومه دیگه لطف شما رفقا باعث میشه که کشیده شم به سمت کار کردن و تنها علتشم فقط همینه و بس، بابت کم و کاستی هایی که تو این چند سال از فعالیتم داشتم و شاید دوباره داشته باشم ازتون عذر میخوام و اگر نتونستم فعالیتم رو ادامه

179🕊5👍2

4 Jun 2026, 23:07 UTC≈2,750 views95 reactionsread 7 August 2026

زندگی کردن من مردن تدریجی بود آنچه جان کَنْد تنم، عمر حسابش کردم

79🕊11👍5

28 May 2026, 15:44 UTC≈3,580 views88 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥6417🕊7

28 May 2026, 13:32 UTC≈2,940 views79 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

65🕊9🔥5

23 Apr 2026, 17:44 UTC≈3,100 views98 reactionsread 7 August 2026

دم اونایی گرم که جویای حال شدن 🌱 امیدوارم حال همه خوب باشه

84🕊14

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Saleckca. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 244,076 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Hamed Fard
@HamedFardMusic · 107,403
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ali Saleck” (@Saleckca), 2,201 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Saleckca.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.