Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Канал | 𝗦𝗚 𝗦𝘁𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗼

Channel

Канал | 𝗦𝗚 𝗦𝘁𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗼

@SaintGooseStudio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,138subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001545184290
TypeChannel
Username@SaintGooseStudio
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SaintGooseStudio

Growth

2,1382,1712,154.58 August 2026 — 2,171 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,171 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,161 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,157 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,150 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,148 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,138 subscribers8 August 202627 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 19 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,133–2,176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 15:362,138-10
21 Aug 2026, 00:032,148-2
17 Aug 2026, 18:272,150-7
14 Aug 2026, 19:082,157-4
11 Aug 2026, 20:122,161-10
8 Aug 2026, 23:502,171no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:332,171first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 13 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

971 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍62063.9%
🔥12613.0%
👎616.28%
🤝545.56%
❤‍🔥414.22%
272.78%
👏121.24%
💘70.721%
😈50.515%
🆒40.412%
custom 540478975727424319930.309%
🏆30.309%
20.206%
🐳20.206%
👻20.206%
🥰10.103%
🦄10.103%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 971reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2025 to 19 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
38
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 17 we hold a reading for · 41%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SaintGooseStudio. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 February 2025 to 19 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Feb 2025, 18:36 UTC≈14,400 views232 reactions11 Starsread 8 August 2026

конец.

👍139👎42❤‍🔥12🤝12👏5💘5😈5🔥4

19 Feb 2025, 17:46 UTC≈13,800 views146 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Теперь, когда канал окончательно пал, я буду вынужден уйти. Спасибо вам всем за то, что вы были со мной. Без вас, я бы не достиг таких высот. Но, не бывает ничего вечного. Этот канал сгнил, этот канал пал и как бы я не старался и как бы я не говорил что этот канал все ещё можно восстановить.... Увы, я ещё раз повторю, ничего не бывает вечного. Были негативные эмоциональные всплески, положительные. Спасибо менто, ло

👍85🤝259❤‍🔥7👎7🏆3👏3🔥3

Signed Forgi 66

19 Feb 2025, 17:25 UTC≈12,200 views72 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ДОПОЛНЕНИЕ: С чатом ничего не будет, он останется, но вряд ли вам будет нужен мёртвый чат..

👍56❤‍🔥6👎43🤝3

Signed

19 Feb 2025, 17:24 UTC≈11,400 views75 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Я очень давно думал над решением заморозить или и того вовсе - полностью закрыть канал. Причины очень просты - канал умирал, а попытки как-то его оживить не давали результата. Пусть у нас были и пиары, и один раз розыгрыш, ничего не менялось - люди огромным потоком продолжали отписываться, вместо хоть какого-то роста канал лишь падал и падал с каждым днём, все ниже и ниже. Единственное, что могл

👍52🔥65🤝4❤‍🔥3👎2🥰1🦄1

Signed

19 Feb 2025, 16:48 UTC≈6,330 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

... #оффтоп #прочее

👍23❤‍🔥2👏1🤝1

Signed

19 Feb 2025, 16:08 UTC≈5,930 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А может быть те, кто ушли, правы? Может этот канал действительно стал мёртвой точкой, которая не может сдвинуться с места? Я не хотел писать этот пост, особенно сейчас, но честно. Не кажется ли вам то, что этот канал изжил себя изнутри? Как видите, ушли многие. Тароу, ещё один админ, это нанесло серьёзный урон этому каналу и её составляющую. Если так и продолжится, то канал распадётся и его больше не будет... Сейчас

🔥29👍6❤‍🔥2💘2🤝1

Signed Forgi 66

19 Feb 2025, 15:28 UTC≈4,950 views31 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026

Пока я буду появляться редко.!Я не ухожу у меня передышка!За это время буду думать с Владельцем каков исход.

👍27❤‍🔥2🔥1🤝1

Signed ❄︎Lσɾɗ❄︎

19 Feb 2025, 15:22 UTC≈4,670 views40 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026

Здравствуйте, дорогие участники Saint Goose Studio! Я бы хотела попрощаться с вами. Все это время было непростым и одновременно хорошим. Было приятно пройти с вами через все. Было приятно быть здесь. Но сейчас, похоже, подошел к концу мой путь. Я хочу поблагодарить каждого из вас за общение, вдохновение и незабываемые моменты, которые мы разделили.Благодарю каждого участника с кем у меня получилось весьма хорошее, х

👍36🤝3❤‍🔥1

Signed ❄︎Lσɾɗ❄︎

19 Feb 2025, 15:12 UTC≈4,120 views22 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👍20❤‍🔥1🤝1

Signed ❄︎Lσɾɗ❄︎

19 Feb 2025, 15:09 UTC≈4,030 views26 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🔥24❤‍🔥1🤝1

Signed

19 Feb 2025, 15:08 UTC≈4,120 views46 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дамы и господа, я покидаю сгс. Это был долгий, долгий и захыватывающий путь, я повидал многое. А щас, смысл моего нахождения здесь исчерпан, до конца Сам сгс мертв, каков смысл моего присутствия тут? Может кто то скажет: выкладывать новости, и вы будете правы, но я хочу наконецто распрощаться с сгс. Как говорил великий Альберт энштейн: «Стремись не к тому, чтобы добиться успеха, а к тому, чтобы твоя жизнь имела смысл

👍363👏3🤝2❤‍🔥1👎1

Signed

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @SaintGooseStudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 69,994 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Holy Baam
@holybaam_live · 86,085
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Канал | 𝗦𝗚 𝗦𝘁𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗼” (@SaintGooseStudio), 2,138 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SaintGooseStudio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.