Channel
@Saimon_psy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4,888subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001969236696 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Saimon_psy |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Saimon_psy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 4,888 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 4,895 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 4,901 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:41 | 4,907 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 4,908 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 4,908 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,143 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 742 | 64.9% | |
| 😱 | 205 | 17.9% | |
| 🤡 | 79 | 6.91% | |
| 😁 | 60 | 5.25% | |
| 🗿 | 49 | 4.29% | |
| 🤪 | 8 | 0.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2024 to 13 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Прощай, Саймон, с тобой было хорошо. Но, к сожалению, это общество не созидателей, а потребителей. Люди привыкли, что им все «должны» дать, преподнести, разжевать, а сами в ответ ничего предпринимать не желают. Так и живут. Ничего не поделаешь. Надеюсь, что ты найдешь «свою» компанию. Прощай и … до свидания.
❤306😱166🤡57🗿24🤪6
Друзья, голосуем по поводу подписки на канал (120 руб./месяц). Если ваших положительных ответов наберется более 250, истории про Саймона продолжатся.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤49🗿24🤡15😱13🤪2
Друзья, на этом канале уже вышло 535 историй про Саймона. Надеюсь, они подарили вам много добрых эмоций. К тому же, истории всегда сопровождались познавательной информацией об особенностях психических процессов, ту либо иную грань которых они отражали. Но каждая история - это работа, и она требует много усилий. Поэтому пришло время делать выбор: либо продолжать истории, либо на этом остановиться. Это зависит от вас.…
❤45😱18🤡7
Photo, posted without a caption
❤45😁12🗿1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤41😁8
Волевые процессы. Волевые качества человека. Самооценка. Качество самоконтроля, его адекватность в значительной степени зависят от самооценки личности. Самооценка - это оценка человеком самого себя: своих качеств, возможностей, способностей, особенностей своей деятельности. То, как человек относится к себе, «программирует» его на дальнейшие действия. Так, низкая самооценка может привести к тому, что человек теряет…
❤20
Гуляя, Саймон столкнулся на узкой дорожке с незнакомым котом. Это был очень крупный желто-полосатый кот, который стоял и надменно наблюдал за Саймоном. - Здравствуйте, - вежливо поздоровался Саймон. - Меня Саймон зовут, а вас? - Ну и что, - флегматично ответил кот, - какое мне дело, как тебя зовут. Хоть Белым Пуфиком. И заговаривать со мной можешь только когда я разрешу. А так должен подобострастно молчать в присут…
❤28😱3😁2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤19😁2
Юпитер прождал Саймона все утро, но так и не дождался, хотя они договорились пойти на речку, и, обеспокоенный, отправился к Саймону домой. Саймон оказался дома, вернее рядом с домом. Он сидел, привалившись к березе, о чем-то глубоко задумавшись. - Саймон, что случилось? Мы же договорились, что ты зайдешь, - начал недовольно Юпитер. Но, когда Саймон повернул к нему голову, тон резко изменился, - а что это у тебя с гл…
❤20😁3😱3
Волевые процессы. Волевые качества человека. Самоконтроль. Последовательность действий, в свою очередь, самым тесным образом связана с самоконтролем. Самоконтроль — это способность контролировать свои эмоции, мысли, поведение. Он основывается на воле и тесно связан с понятием психической саморегуляции. Самоконтроль является важнейшим элементом в способности человека достигать поставленных целей. Принятые действия …
❤13
Photo, posted without a caption
❤27😁2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤25😁7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Saimon_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Друзья, голосуем по поводу подписки на канал (120 руб./месяц). Если ваших положительных ответов наберется более 250, истории про Саймона продолжатся.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2024 to 13 May 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,431,597 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психология с Саймоном | Саморазвитие” (@Saimon_psy), 4,888 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Saimon_psy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.