Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[Рест] Ꭲhᴇ Ꭲruᴛhsᴀyᴇr! | 𝑺𝒂𝒈𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒕𝒉 𝗕𝗟𝗢𝗚 [🌀]

@SageOfTruth_pfs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

51subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003962712654
TypeChannel
Username@SageOfTruth_pfs
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 29 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SageOfTruth_pfs

Growth

5113 Aug 2026, 19:36 — 51 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 20:05 — 51 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 19:3614 Aug 2026, 20:05
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50–52 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:0551no change
13 Aug 2026, 19:3651first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.4%
avg views ÷ 51 subscribers
Avg views / post
26.7
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
25.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total534
Reactions total69
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

69 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊3753.6%
🙏3246.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC17 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Адм. (Доп) Ещё у Сейджа здесь нет никакого продвижения. Он просто сидит дома, у него нет работы и придумывать посты о том, чем он может заняться дома сложно очень.

🕊1

11 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC17 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Адм. Меня посетили мысли, что я устала от Сейджа и сейчас я думаю нужен ли мне этот блог. Мне стыдно, что я могу бросить это место в один момент, но хорошее всегда заканчивается. Ведение блога должно быть увлечением, а не работой. В последнее время блог ощущается именно как работа.

🕊1

11 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC11 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @PANDORASFAUNASETKA

⟩⟩ 🤩est.. ➖ажется, смотрителю понадобился отдых. . . Мудрец Истины уходит в рест до 1 сентября #Rest_PFS

🙏1

9 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC25 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🥹 🥹 😂 Anon ... 🥹 🐾:: Вы умеете рисовать??Если да, то как часто вы это делаете? 🎀Рисую я не часто и я думаю, что вообще не умею рисовать. 🎀К этому просто таланта нет. Я знаю как рисовать, всю теорию цвета, перспективы, но когда смотрю на картины они какие-то блеклые, не такие как нужно. Также линии ещё кривые абсолютно. Это пример того, что я могу знать всё на свете, но не факт, что могу правил

🕊4🙏4

9 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC23 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🎀Я слегка подзабыл о блоге кажется, потому что ничем примечательным я не занимался всё это время. Книгу читал если только и уборку свитков делал. 🎀Я думаю, что отвечу ещё на вопрос и пойду дальше читать книгу, она довольно интересная, даже очень. Кстати скоро лето кончится, а вы сами как тут, друзья мои? 🌟 🤩 Sage of Truth🤩🤩

🕊4🙏3

6 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC28 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🥹 🥹 😂 Anon ... 🥹 🐾:: как избавится от танатофобии. ТОЛЬКО БЕЗ ПСИХОЛОГОВ ПЖ 🎀Я же говорил не стоит заниматься самодеятельностью. 🌟 🎀Ходить ко врачам - это важно, бояться психолога не стоит. Единственное, что может вас подвести, это то, что специалист не будет держаться врачебного слова о конфиденциальности ваших данных о приёмах, но в основном все врачи придерживаются врачебного слова.

🕊3🙏3

6 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC26 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🥹 🥹 😂 Anon ... 🥹 🐾:: (Продолжение вопроса о теме ребёнка,также на размышление) А если бы эта девочка стала человеком? Вы бы не боялись её? 🎀А с чего бы это я должен её бояться? Я приму её такой, какая она есть. Кем бы она не была. 🌟 🎀К тому-же я сейчас сам человек и сами по себе люди не такие уж и плохие. 🤩 Sage of Truth🤩🤩

🕊5🙏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SageOfTruth_pfs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,187,675 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[Рест] Ꭲhᴇ Ꭲruᴛhsᴀyᴇr! | 𝑺𝒂𝒈𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒕𝒉 𝗕𝗟𝗢𝗚 [🌀]” (@SageOfTruth_pfs), 51 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SageOfTruth_pfs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.