OMG THE METAMASK AIRDROP

Channel
Saga Monke Playbook
@SagaMonke
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002059953665 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SagaMonke |
| Description | plays for monke's by a monke |
| Created | 8 January 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SagaMonke |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 4 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 8 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
- Links
- 5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 5 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤩 | 5 | 27.8% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 16.7% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 5.56% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2024 to 21 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Man Haku Ryujin is holding better than any coin I've ever seen on Solana above 100k. Literally I'm talking over 2 days STAYED above 200k. Y'all already know what that means for a meme coin. The branding is fucking rediculously good, the mods are super based. This little girl and this white dragon are gonna take it past a million I PROMISE Website: www.HakuRyujin.cloud X: https://twitter.com/HakuRyujinSol Telegra…
⚡1👀1💯1🥰1
Well after how amazing of a call wut was You already know the next one is a BANGER Introducing H A K U R Y U J I N Website: www.HakuRyujin.cloud X: https://twitter.com/HakuRyujinSol Telegram: https://t.me/HakuRyujin Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hakuryujinsol 🐲🐉🐉 only 145k mc def gonna be over a mil in 48 hours MAX Invite Solana Chads : https://t.me/+JeOLeZ3M0s82YmE9
👀1👏1🔥1🥰1
WHAT DID I TELL YOU ABOUT WUT?!? SITTING AT 400K!?
🤩5
File, posted without a caption
SEC JUST POSTED THIS ON THEIR SITE
Alright you cheeky monkeys I got an INCREDIBLE play for y'all today The other day Meow from Jupiter had a while Convo online where ended up saying "y'all meme wut" So a team of guys took this really serious and launched $wut. It did alright and then Jeet dev jeeted. A guy came through with a team and they took that bitch over and ran it from 6k to 300k and now it's reconciled to 70ish. Guys it's been alive for 3 …
👍3🔥1
This is for the homies. Never degen without it @devsellingscans @devsellingbotupdates @devsellinglounge @is_dev_selling_bot
y'all remember PUMPR? Well they're a launchpad that blew up recently and they've gpot their first presale launched its called $NFS Never Fucking Selling And i'm gonna be honest, team seems experienced, chat is going well, theyve got a good on rugcheck all in all good job pumpr, i'll give an update later but so far so good aty 43k mc. https://dexscreener.com/solana/gktwvt4meunj4vcc52mvn7arswkjkzqbpr2yautzdstd h…
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @SagaMonke. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@SagaMonke named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Saga Monke Playbook” (@SagaMonke), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SagaMonke.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.