Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for صدى الغالبون

Channel

صدى الغالبون

@Sadr_supporters

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,295subscribers

-231 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001797737665
TypeChannel
Username@Sadr_supporters
Descriptionقناة (صدى الغالبون) ليس تابعة لاحد وجدت القناة لنصرة ال الصدر الكرام ولشهداء الاصلاح تابعة لشباب متطوعين لخدمة الخط الصدري ان شاء الله يعجبكم كل عمل جديد.. 💙💙 لمن يود التواصل مع كادر القناة عبر البوت https://t.me/Contactushere23457bot
CreatedBetween 1 February 2022 and 31 January 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sadr_supporters

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@SabrenNewss/22147110 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC@Sadr_supporters/51883 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC1.002.5 hours
@SabrenNewss/22157111 Aug 2026, 04:40 UTC@Sadr_supporters/51929 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 23:23 UTC1.0019 hours
@SabrenNewss/22268121 Aug 2026, 03:20 UTC@Sadr_supporters/52228 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 04:26 UTC1.0067 minutes
@SabrenNewss/22312626 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC@Sadr_supporters/52260 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC1.007.2 hours
@SabrenNewss/22323627 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC@Sadr_supporters/52273 · this entry27 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC1.003.2 hours
@SabrenNewss/22353031 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC@Sadr_supporters/52306 · this entry31 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC1.001.8 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@SabrenNewss18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.2 hours@SabrenNewss (18–0)
@BROTHERSIRQ6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9714 minutes@BROTHERSIRQ (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 24 of the 24 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 135 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

11,29511,53811,416.56 August 202614 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 100 days, net -231. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,259–11,574 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 22:1511,295-11
11 Nov 2026, 18:5911,306-2
10 Nov 2026, 01:2611,308-4
8 Nov 2026, 16:2011,312+1
7 Nov 2026, 12:4511,311-5
5 Nov 2026, 12:0111,316-3
4 Nov 2026, 10:3511,319-1
3 Nov 2026, 12:1811,320-3
2 Nov 2026, 13:4511,323-7
1 Nov 2026, 14:4811,330-5
31 Oct 2026, 15:5511,335-4
30 Oct 2026, 13:5611,339-8
28 Oct 2026, 09:1611,347-7
27 Oct 2026, 08:0911,354+2
26 Oct 2026, 04:4711,352-3
25 Oct 2026, 07:4111,355-2
24 Oct 2026, 04:1511,357-4
23 Oct 2026, 06:5611,361-1
22 Oct 2026, 07:4911,362-2
20 Oct 2026, 23:4411,364first reading

Engagement

558 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.68%
avg views ÷ 11,295 subscribers
Avg views / post
981
173 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
173
of 558 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 172 of 173 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held558 (6 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total169,637
Reactions total1,754
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 22:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈31,300
Videos
≈6,200
Links
≈1,640

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16m 51s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,738 reactions across 547 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,11661.1%
🔥84012.5%
💔75211.2%
👍69710.3%
🫡1241.84%
🙏901.34%
👏851.26%
🕊340.505%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 547 of the 558 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,738 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 558 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 173 posts held from the last 30 days (2.89%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 21:48 UTC157 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @khutaaaltuhar

بنية الشفاء لأحد الإخوة المرضى، وطلباً لشفاء مرضاكم ومرضانا الصلاة على محمد وال محمد اللهم صلِّ على محمد وآل محمد.

❤12

14 Nov 2026, 19:36 UTC549 views15 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤14👍1

14 Nov 2026, 19:34 UTC559 views8 reactionsread 14 November 2026

الزيدي يوجه بإعفاء عدد من القادة الأمنيين قرر إعفاء كل من: قائد شرطة بابل. مدير شرطة شمال بابل. مدير استخبارات ومكافحة إرهاب بابل في وزارة الداخلية. مدير الأمن الوطني في بابل. مدير استخبارات وأمن محافظة بابل في وزارة الدفاع. مدير مخابرات بابل. قائد الحشد الشعبي في بابل. آمر اللواء السادس لشرطة الطاقة في وزارة الداخلية. مدير شركة خطوط الأنابيب النفطية في وزارة النفط.

❤7👍1

14 Nov 2026, 19:28 UTC569 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026

الناطق باسم القائد العام: اللجنة التحقيقية بشأن تهريب النفط في جرف النصر أكدت صحة معلومات وكالة الاستخبارات

❤5

14 Nov 2026, 14:12 UTC871 views15 reactionsread 14 November 2026

الأمن الوطني يحبط محاولة إدخال هواتف ومواد ممنوعة إلى سجن الحلة ويطيح بشبكة تواطؤ

👍13❤2

14 Nov 2026, 09:29 UTC960 views18 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @khutaaaltuhar

إن عوائل الشهداء هم ذخيرة مهمة وثروة عظيمة داخل المجتمع، فهم عنوان للتضحية والوفاء، ومدرسة للأجيال في الصبر والثبات والعطاء. والسلام على عوائل الشهداء الأبطال ورحمة الله تعالى وبركاته…

❤14💔2🫡2

14 Nov 2026, 09:11 UTC996 views7 reactionsread 14 November 2026

فوكس نيوز: شركة أمتراك المشغل الوطني للقطارات في الولايات المتحدة تبلغ عن مشكلات في موقعها الإلكتروني وتطبيقها.

❤5🔥2

14 Nov 2026, 09:11 UTC986 views6 reactionsread 14 November 2026

ثروة ترامب ترتفع ملياري دولار منذ عودته للبيت الأبيض

❤4🔥2

14 Nov 2026, 00:31 UTC≈1,160 views11 reactionsread 14 November 2026

شباب المدينة احد يفهمنا شنو هذا الرمي تحديداً قطاعات الكيارة

❤11

13 Nov 2026, 22:23 UTC≈1,230 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026

السلطات الأميركية تطلب من جميع الطائرات المغادرة للولايات المتحدة البقاء على الأرض حتى إشعار آخر

🔥4❤1

13 Nov 2026, 22:22 UTC≈1,190 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026

طائرة اميركية تطلق انذار الطوارئ 7700 فوق بحر عمان

🔥4❤1

13 Nov 2026, 22:22 UTC≈1,180 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026

مجلس خبراء القيادة الايراني : دراسة مسألة الخروج من معاهدة عدم انتشار الأسلحة النووية (NPT) أصبحت ضرورة لا مفر منها وتحولت إلى مطلب شعبي ووطني

🔥4❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 558 posts we hold for @Sadr_supporters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

زعيم المقاومة
@The_leader313 · 24,950
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
وزير القائد - صالح محمد العراقي
@Salihaliraqi · 167,307
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
شبكة الوسام الاعلامية
@Al_wesamnews2023 · 35,975
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
قاف | QAAF
@Qa_af1 · 20,934
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 September 2026
الأضواء نيوز - Aladwaa News
@AladiwaNewss · 26,120
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
البنيان المرصوص المركزي
@albnyan · 28,970
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
مستشفى عطاء الصدر - واحة الخير
@centralmediadepartmen · 24,379
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
الرصافة +
@alrusafa_plus · 27,310
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
المكتب الخاص لسماحة السيد مقتدى الصدر
@jawabna · 59,272
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
المركز الاعلامي الوطني
@nmc2019 · 46,566
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“صدى الغالبون” (@Sadr_supporters), 11,295 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sadr_supporters.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.