Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝖲𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖢𝖺𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋

@SabrinaAccess

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,039subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002418494440
TypeChannel
Username@SabrinaAccess
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SabrinaAccess

Growth

1,0391,0491,0446 August 2026 — 1,049 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,049 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,048 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,044 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,039 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,038–1,051 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:321,039-5
9 Aug 2026, 22:211,044-4
6 Aug 2026, 21:231,048-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:461,049no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:341,049first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 1,039 subscribers
Avg views / post
125
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held9 (6 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,122
Reactions total85
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭2731.8%
💔2529.4%
❤‍🔥1416.5%
🍓1011.8%
👀910.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC98 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

تمام شد، آهنگ ها رو از اینجا گوش کنید.

🍓3

Signed alex

6 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC104 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

شان مندز هم درجواب اومد گفت اره قارچ میزنم یه پادکست با جان مایر رفت💀 یه اهنگ ساخت گفت واااای من کیو دارم گول میزنم اول اخرش عاشق کامیلام حتی اگر با سابرینا باشم، گی شد، پشیمون شد، مسلمون شد، پشیمون شد، رفت با اکس نیمار. (Will you crash the car and abandon the wreckage? Just 'cause you leave like one doesn't make you a man) ꕥ #Update ୨— @SabrinaAccess —୧

😭4

Signed alex

6 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC106 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

سابرینا آهنگ “Taste” و “Cindy Lou Who” رو در خطاب به کامیلا نوشته. و آهنگ های “Coincidence” و “Dumb & Poetic” و “Sharpest Tool” رو در خطاب به شان نوشته. در آهنگ “Coincidence” سابرینا به شب کوچلا و اتفاقات دورش اشاره میکنه. اینکه شان فقط هفت درصد حقیقت رو بهش گفت (گفت که فقط میره اکسشو ببینه نمیره دو شب سکس کنن و رابطه رو از اول شروع کنن). اینکه چجوری شان با کامیلا چت میکنه، یهویی به شک میوفته و هفته بعدش میره سراغ ک

💔10

Signed alex

6 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC111 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Lyrics vs. Lyrics I might as well say, "Meet me in Montauk" - June Gloom Now she's in the same damn city on the same damn night - Coincidence She's cool, I heard - June Gloom Oh, I leave quite an impression - Taste Won't act surprised, I saw the pictures - June Gloom She knew, she's got a real sixth sense - Coincidence How come you're just so much better? - June Gloom He's funny now, all his jokes hit different

🍓7

Signed alex

6 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC115 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

در طی این مدت کامیلا ادای حمایت کردن از سابرینا رو در میاورد و شان مندز کیرشر میگفت، تا اینکه سابرینا سینگل “Taste” رو در جواب “June Gloom” منتشر کرد. جالبه بدونید که سابرینا برای موزیک ویدیوی این آهنگ از جنا اورتگا که مثل کامیلا لاتین هست استفاده کرد! و سپس آلبوم “Short n’ Sweet” رو منتشر کرد. آهنگ های “Dumb & Poetic” و “Sharpest Tool” و “Coincidence” راجع به همین رابطه هستند. ꕥ #Update ୨— @SabrinaAccess —୧

❤‍🔥13

Signed alex

6 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC130 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

دومین اهنگی که راجع به این رابطه منتشر شده، June Gloom از کامیلا کابیو بود. کامیلا در این آهنگ کاملا به این قضیه که میدونه شان و سابرینا باهم تو رابطه ان اشاره میکنه! بخشی از لیریک این آهنگ: She's cool, I heard Won't act surprised, I saw the pictures If she's so amazing, why are you on this side of town? If you like her so much, what are you here trying to find out? Does she get this wet for you, baby? Talk to you in

💔15

Signed alex

6 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC132 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

بعد از کوچلا کامیلا و شان اعلام کردند که به رابطه ای که دو سال پیش تموم شده شانس دوباره دادند🫩! اولین آهنگی که راجع به این وضعیت منتشر شده، “Cindy Lou Who” بود. سابرینا این آهنگ رو در مینی‌آلبوم کریسمسیش قرار داد. بخشی از لیریک های این آهنگ: I saw you laughing in one of his pictures There's red and green everywhere, but l'm so blue with your hair so long, lips so red maybe we met once, I forget scrolling five years b

👀9

Signed alex

6 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC159 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

یک ماه بعد از اخرین باری که شان و سابرینا باهم دیده شده بودند، شان و کامیلا درحال بوسیدن همدیگه توی کوچلا دیده شدند! شان مندز بعد ها راجع به این روز گفت ”من به پارتنر اون زمانم گفتم که میخوام برم اکسم رو ببینم“ سابرینا در آهنگ Coincidence به این وضعیت اشاره کرد: Last week, you didn't have any doubts This week, you're holding space for her tongue in your mouth ꕥ #Update ୨— @SabrinaAccess —୧

😭12❤‍🔥1

Signed alex

6 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC167 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

دوسال بعد از جدایی کامیلا کابیو و شان مندز، شان و سابرینا برای اولین بار در فوریه ۲۰۲۳ باهم دیده شدن. بعد از اون در مارس همون سال دو بار با هم دیده شدن. توی همون ماه وقتی از شان مندز راجع به رابطشون پرسیدن، شان در جواب گفت که باهم تو رابطه نیستند! ꕥ #Update ୨— @SabrinaAccess —୧

😭11

Signed alex

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @SabrinaAccess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 173,293 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝖲𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖢𝖺𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋” (@SabrinaAccess), 1,039 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SabrinaAccess.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.