6 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC51 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
✿深圳05年艺术学院在校生🍑短期兼职🍑真新人🍑下面超紧 ✿height净足170 🍑 weight45kg 🍑 真实天然C ✿来自成都 超级温柔型 又乖又甜 配合度高 好评必选🍑 ✿身材前凸后翘 人前高冷清纯人后骚 绝对强烈反差小母狗 网红洋气类型 🍑 ✿皮肤雪白 牛奶肌肤 只接待素质客 真人比照片好看🍑 ✿没有艺术照 照片全是日常生活自拍 主打的就是真实🍑
Channel
广州 深圳 全国外围 资料实时更新
@SZXX11
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,007subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001725765024 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SZXX11 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SZXX11 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 1,007 | +11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 996 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 996 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.84%
- avg views ÷ 1,007 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 48.8
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 4 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 195 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 20s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
6 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC47 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @QGSZ7Photo
藏族学生妹 06年 162 90斤 天然🐻C 纯新人 首次下海 短期兼职 🉑69 舌吻 蜜桃臀+细腰+🐻C 三点粉嫩 逼紧水多
6 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC52 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
慧慧 04年 身高159 体重90 抱起来C 🌸纯天然无整 无任何疤痕 皮肤白皙 🌸 純慾嗲娇魅惑 • 🐻 C+ 飽滿** 后入勾魂**四肢纤细 𝗦腰緊緻 气质体态完美 🌸 皮肤白皙 牛奶肌 🌸 ▪️谈吐得体 性格温柔 风格多变 清纯甜美，床上大胆，给你不一样的完美体验感觉 🌸🉑69蛇吻共浴 ，🈶jk丝袜情趣
6 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC45 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
🤍SZ🏠3外🦜极品高白纯 🤍02年身高175🐻E 🤍皮肤雪白透亮纯天然零整容 🤍长年瑜伽普拉提气质超好 🤍无纹身性格开朗温柔体贴 🤍佛系兼职不接急 提前预约
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @SZXX11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 963,560 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“广州 深圳 全国外围 资料实时更新” (@SZXX11), 1,007 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SZXX11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.