Channel
@SZJXLB
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
46subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003583974316 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SZJXLB |
| Created | 23 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SZJXLB |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 46 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 45 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 45 | first reading |
2 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 24 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【深圳金玺】：https://t.me/SZJXQ 【出击时间】：2026-05-22 【老师昵称】：珊珊 【联系方式】：@shangunun 【学生留名】：这个没了吧 【人照相似】：1 【身材评分】：1 【服务评分】：1 【态度评分】：1 【环境评分】：1 【综合评分】：1 【过程描述】： 在别的群中的半价p券（原价1400p）联系老师预约上课，注意群里是龙岗姗姗，老师频道里是龙岗珊珊，问在哪里说是在罗湖（见图片）于是约定时间一探究竟，按照老师导航上楼，进门发现不是照片本人，跟视频照片没有半点关系，目测30+，课表是19岁，辩称是P图，于是便离开，兄弟们要注意，哪怕本人也不值1400
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @SZJXLB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“金玺雷报” (@SZJXLB), 46 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SZJXLB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.