Channel
@SZCHZBGQ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14,177subscribers
-698 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002233443508 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SZCHZBGQ |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SZCHZBGQ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 14,177 | -22 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 14,199 | -18 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 14,217 | +27 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 14,190 | -23 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 14,213 | -295 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 14,508 | -348 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 14,856 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 14,863 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 14,866 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 14,874 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 14,875 | first reading |
76 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 76 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 76 (1 August 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 43,684 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
深圳茶汇总 报告：https://t.me/SZCHZBGQ 〖品茶留名〗：#yxmaq 〖品茶时间〗：8.17 〖品茶消费〗：700P 〖品茶坐标〗：#深圳南山 〖茶师艺名〗：#江晚晴 〖茶师颜值〗：9.5 〖体验细节〗：江晚晴老师性格好热情大方，熊大一手抓不住，手感极佳，臀部身材好棒。一起沐浴，她先用水打湿我的身体，然后，她取过沐浴露，轻柔地涂抹在我的身上，泡沫细腻而丰富，散发出阵阵清香，我的双手一直揉着老师的胸，泡沫冲洗干净后江晚晴老师便进行了水中萧，擦干后上床，课表服务全都有，做的也非常到位，戴套提枪传教士，缓进慢出，前一分钟慢节奏。后续加速度桩几分钟，转后入，后入的时候，感觉非常紧有种被夹住的快感，叫声很动听，非常喜欢这种很骚很魅的，顶着肉臀，深入浅出，在肉臀上加速度桩了几分钟出货。喜欢服务型的老师可以冲。 〖茶师联系〗：@jqing99 〖推荐程度〗：⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️（一星/很差，二星/差，三星/正常，四星/推荐…
深圳茶汇总 报告：https://t.me/SZCHZBGQ 〖品茶留名〗：xiao job 〖品茶时间〗：8.17 〖品茶消费〗：1600pp 〖品茶坐标〗：#宝安 〖茶师艺名〗：#诗雨 〖茶师颜值〗：人照一样，颜值身材超顶。皮肤特别好，白皙滑嫩 〖体验细节〗：诗雨是个非常年轻漂亮的嫩妹，很养眼，很温柔，身材摸起来滑滑的，屁股也又大又白，技术也好，🐍很久，口活柔软无齿感，让老师把美鲍送到我的脸上，bb粉嫩很好看，很敏感，舔的老师一阵扭动，娇喘声也越来越大。带🌂进入，里面很滑很紧暖暖的，过程特别舒服，换了几个姿势都是配合着，最后感觉老师的呻吟节奏越来越急促，直接加速，一起 gc 非常满足，身材服务和女友感都非常棒👍服务周到细致，一点都不敷衍 〖茶师联系〗： @shiyu669 〖推荐程度〗：⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐（一星/很差，二星/差，三星/正常，四星/推荐，五星/强烈推荐，必返食） 〖友情提醒〗：报告仅供参考，请理性选择，不要对号入座。…
圳茶汇总 报告：https://t.me/SZCHZBGQ 〖品茶留名〗：#dwvsj 〖品茶时间〗：8.17 〖品茶消费〗：700P 〖品茶坐标〗：#深圳南山 〖茶师艺名〗：#果果老师 〖茶师颜值〗：9.6 〖体验细节〗：上次约完果果老师就念念不忘，今天有空早早约上时间，到点出发。交完水费迫不及待，一起沐浴，感受老师暖暖的身体在身上肆意摩擦。洗完澡整个人还麻酥酥的，那种骨子里的骚劲儿真让人顶不住，身体柔韧度特别美，还有新买的情趣，虽然这次没带我买的小套装，但老师准备的连体黑丝也特有感觉。一回到床上，跪在面前，小手灵活抚摸，小嘴直接裹了上来。不得不说口活是一绝，吸吮感强烈，舌头裹着上下套弄，有了上次的经验让老师慢慢停下来开始正餐我整个人压了上去，直接顺着大腿根把丝袜撕开一个大口子。让她双手撑在床头，屁股高高撅起，从后面一挺到底。抽插的啪啪声视觉冲击力很爽，掐着LS的腰抽插，耳边全是她那带颤音的反差骚叫，脑子发麻，每一次都使劲顶到…
深圳茶汇总 报告：https://t.me/SZCHZBGQ 〖品茶留名〗：#jack 〖品茶时间〗：8.17 〖品茶消费〗：PP1800 〖品茶坐标〗：#上塘 〖茶师艺名〗：#小丸子 〖茶师颜值〗：9 〖体验细节〗：约老师上楼，照片真人9分相似，个子娇小，喜欢萝莉的可以冲，陪洗澡后开始服务，口虽有齿感但是很卖力，戴套女上，包裹感极强，女上真的很猛，身材娇小抱着很舒服。 〖茶师联系〗：@wz8087 〖推荐程度〗：⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐（五星/强烈推，必返食） 〖友情提醒〗：报告仅供参考，请理性选择，不要对号入座。 提交报告联系：@chahuizong 双向联系：@szchahuizong_bot （备注：提交报告需提供聊天记录）
深圳茶汇总 报告：https://t.me/SZCHZBGQ 〖品茶留名〗：伯恩 〖品茶时间〗：8月16号 〖品茶消费〗：1288P/2188PP 〖品茶坐标〗：南山 〖茶师艺名〗：彤彤 〖茶师颜值〗：颜值9成、漂亮 〖体验细节〗：又是一个优质老师，约了好几次终于约到合适时间，公寓酒店，环境还是挺好的，老师身材顶级，衣品也很好，一身包臀裙，粉色亮钻小高跟，交完水费，老师准备脱衣，赶紧制止住，就穿着这身做，扒彤彤老师的肩带，2颗细长的乳头，第一次吃这样的奶头，口感如珍珠的奶头常见，口感像面条的还第一吃，我自己快速洗完（老师有陪浴服务），又大吃了五分钟奶头，摸了一会下面小豆豆，出水后戴套开干，老师比较脆皮，不太耐日，做爱反馈不错，深入的时候，全身都绷紧了，加上落地镜，高跟鞋的加持，做爱的感觉还是很棒的。 总体来说，老师颜值中上，身材顶级，态度很好，值得打卡二刷。 〖茶师联系〗：@mnjjjvv 〖推荐程度〗：⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️…
深圳茶汇总 报告：https://t.me/SZCHZBGQ 〖品茶留名〗：大飞 〖品茶时间〗：8月16号 〖品茶消费〗：p 〖品茶坐标〗：#宝安 〖茶师艺名〗：#诗雨 〖茶师颜值〗：非常嫩，身材很顶 〖体验细节〗：太紧了，加速深入没多久就交枪。前面一通忙活后节奏才慢慢提上来，她时不时轻轻呻吟，边🐍边推进，真的有女朋友的感觉。传教士试了好久才勉强进去，紧得明显。穿好雨衣开搞前，她已经湿润。我说还是让我也服务一下你，接着亲胸喝奶。口了一阵后她提出准备带套开波，技术属于刚出道，需要师兄指导调教。上床先舔胸再口，整体听指挥。身材苗条，胸手感不错，有弹性，两颗小红豆爱不释手。简单聊完交水费就去洗。楼下好停车，按指引上楼，门已留好。她有点腼腆，一头长发的嫩妹。很嫩，适合喜欢开发调教的。服务态度好，不催钟，整体体验可以 〖茶师联系〗： @shiyu669 〖推荐程度〗：⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐（一星/很差，二星/差，三星/正常，四星/推荐，五星/强烈推荐…
圳茶汇总 报告：https://t.me/SZCHZBGQ 〖品茶留名〗：#HHH Lee 〖品茶时间〗：8.16 〖品茶消费〗：700P 〖品茶坐标〗：#深圳南山 〖茶师艺名〗：#果果老师 〖茶师颜值〗：9.8 〖体验细节〗：出发前，果果老师便细心地主动询问是否已经启程，并多次提醒注意事项，体贴周到，让人感受到她的细腻与专业。到楼下老师引导我顺利上门，只见她身着黑色连体短裙，妆容精致，显得格外明艳动人。我们先是闲聊了几句，氛围轻松融洽，随后一同沐浴。她动作轻柔，洗净后还主动帮我擦干身体，温柔体贴。进入房间，熟悉的场景让人心生亲切。她依偎在我身边，柔软的唇舌轻舔胸口，随后俯身以口侍奉，技艺娴熟，带来阵阵酥麻快感。过程中，。我便欣然应允。她敏感体质明显，才进行没多久便娇喘连连，难以承受。安全措施到位后，我戴上雨伞，她以女上位跨坐而上，那温热紧致的包裹感令人赞叹。随着她缓缓律动，愉悦感不断攀升。手感依然饱满舒适。之后我们切换至传教…
深圳茶汇总 报告：https://t.me/SZCHZBGQ 〖品茶留名〗：邊卜嘢 〖品茶时间〗：8.16 〖品茶消费〗：1000 〖品茶坐标〗：#南山 〖茶师艺名〗：#小竹子 〖茶师颜值〗：10分 〖体验细节〗： 那天工作很累想要放松一下 于是来到了小竹子这里 服务很好 人很温柔 洗完澡帮忙擦水 位置也在比较舒服的公寓里 不得不说老师抓龙筋的技术是真的很好 是有专业的手法的 最后实在忍不住发射了 老师在发射的时候会保持恰到好处的干预 这是很对技师做不到的 要么太猛 要么太少 这里可以看出老师的功力 而且她有一个计划 在她计划让你出水前会给你放好纸巾 不弄到你身上 另外老师确实很有姐姐的气质 我让老师穿上黑丝细高跟和睡袍 真的很御姐 最后还和老师晚起了小姨cos play 假装是小时候给没经验的小男孩破处 老师很沉侵的配合 虽然我的需求很变态hhh 总的来说是推荐的 〖茶师联系〗：@xzz588 〖推荐程度〗：⭐️⭐️⭐️…
深圳茶汇总 报告：https://t.me/SZCHZBGQ 〖品茶留名〗： Dive 〖品茶时间〗：8月16号 〖品茶消费〗：1099 〖品茶坐标〗：#南山 〖茶师艺名〗：#喵喵酱老师 〖茶师颜值〗：清纯，邻家妹妹气质 〖体验细节〗：这次体验真的必须狠狠夸一下喵喵酱老师，完全超出预期，本来只是想找个安静的地方放松一下，没想到从进门开始就被惊喜到了。位置在公寓里，私密性特别好，环境也比想象中舒服很多，干净整洁、安静温馨，没有乱七八糟的感觉，让人一进去就很放松。 重点一定要夸一下老师，真的很清纯，气质很好，笑起来特别温柔，说话轻声细语的，让人一下子就没有距离感。她不是那种敷衍式服务，整个过程都特别有耐心，也很会照顾我的感受，既温柔又细心，给人的感觉非常舒服。刚开始还有点拘谨，态度自然大方，慢慢就完全放松下来了。手法也很专业，力度拿捏得刚刚好，节奏特别舒服，不会让人觉得生硬，女仆装视觉感很强，调情，三起三落，前列腺真的太太爽，好享受…
深圳茶汇总 报告：https://t.me/SZCHZBGQ 〖品茶留名〗：#shounam 〖品茶时间〗：8.15 〖品茶消费〗：1300PP 〖品茶坐标〗：#深圳南山 〖茶师艺名〗：#江晚晴 〖茶师颜值〗：9.8 〖体验细节〗：预定了第二天的课程，江晚晴老师也是第二次出击了，见面老规矩刷牙洗漱蛇🐍老师挺好的，性格开朗活泼很配合，我喜欢江晚晴老师的淫叫声，叫声好听性感美丽，身材更棒，标准的前凸后翘，吊钟乳，女友感十足，老师可会调情说爱了，舌头的灵敏度就像机器人一样，13张pp价格很值，本人与照片不虚伪作假，甚至本人见面更好看，老师挺好的听推荐给你们！ 〖茶师联系〗：@jqing99 〖推荐程度〗：⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️（一星/很差，二星/差，三星/正常，四星/推荐，五星/强烈推荐，必返食） 〖友情提醒〗：报告仅供参考，请理性选择，不要对号入座。 提交报告联系：@chahuizong 双向联系：@szchahuizong_bot…
深圳茶汇总 报告：https://t.me/SZCHZBGQ 〖品茶留名〗：hshsjsh 〖品茶时间〗：8.16 〖品茶消费〗：700p 〖品茶坐标〗：深圳南山 〖茶师艺名〗：小月亮 〖茶师颜值〗：9 〖体验细节〗：今天约了小月亮老师，一进门就被她的气场和火辣身材深深吸引，尤其是胸前那对丰满大白兔，视觉冲击力十足。简单的寒暄后直接进入正轨，体验了久违的莞式水床服务 水床上的戏份可谓拉满，老师身形婀娜，伴着水波的起伏，全身漫游，游走于每一寸肌肤。随后是极其细致的口活与贴身游走，前戏的铺垫和氛围感做到了极致，让人完全放松且欲罢不能。 移步到床上后，小月亮的主动与温柔更是发挥得淋漓尽致。主动配合着各种姿势，过程中反馈热烈、水汪汪的极具沉浸感。伴随着火热的互动与贴身揉捏，每一分每一秒都充满享受，最后在强烈的夹击感中完美爆出。整场体验无论是硬件身材还是服务细节都属上乘，绝对是一次酣畅淋漓的完美享受！ 〖茶师联系〗：@xixixi200…
深圳茶汇总 报告：https://t.me/SZCHZBGQ 〖品茶留名〗：米老鼠 〖品茶时间〗：8月15号 〖品茶消费〗：1288P/2188PP 〖品茶坐标〗：南山 〖茶师艺名〗：彤彤 〖茶师颜值〗：颜值9成、漂亮 〖体验细节〗：天气炎热，燥热难耐，打开偶然发现彤彤有补位，立即预约.按时间抵达目的地，开门就看到一个大眼妹妹做到沙发上，仔细打磨一番别有韵味，大大的眼睛直勾勾的看着你，洗漱完便开始战斗，彤彤口活还是不错，展现出不属于她年纪的技巧，感觉一到，一整套姿势试遍，最后抱着彤彤发出染色体，总的来说是一次不错的体验 〖茶师联系〗：@mnjjjvv 〖推荐程度〗：⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️（一星/很差，二星/差，三星/正常，四星/推荐，五星/强烈推荐，必返食） 〖友情提醒〗：报告仅供参考，请理性选择，不要对号入座。 提交报告联系：@chahuizong 双向联系：@szchahuizong_bot （备注：提交报告需提供聊天记录…
Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @SZCHZBGQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 126,662 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳茶汇总报告区” (@SZCHZBGQ), 14,177 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SZCHZBGQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.