Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

H3@DSH0T B@BY, Y0U D13D XD

@SWAPau_Noob

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003978873964
TypeChannel
Username@SWAPau_Noob
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SWAPau_Noob

Growth

129 August 2026 — 12 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12 subscribers9 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:0112no change
9 Aug 2026, 06:4712first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
105.4%
avg views ÷ 12 subscribers
Avg views / post
12.7
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total253
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤩375.0%
❤‍🔥125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 21:25 UTC8 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

・┆✦-Cool Noob! ;p-✦ ┆・ ₊˚ ✧ ━━━━⊱⋆⊰━━━━ ✧ ₊˚ [ִ ࣪𖤐.ᐟ] - п0нял!! Зн@ч1т пр0гYлR3мсR, а т@м и выж1вш1х н@йдём! Yв3р3н, чт0 сюд@ кт0-т0 д@ з@брёл. Быв@ют ж3 т@к13! Ты кст@т1 ч3м-т0 з@н1м@3шьсR, 3сл1 3сть н3 х0ч3шь?? Т1п0 п@ркYр т@м, 1л1 чт0-т0 т@к03. Х0бб1 к0р0ч3. ₊˚ ✧ ━━━━⊱⋆⊰━━━━ ✧ ₊˚

🤩1

10 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC9 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

・┆✦-Cool Noob! ;p-✦ ┆・ ₊˚ ✧ ━━━━⊱⋆⊰━━━━ ✧ ₊˚ [ִ ࣪𖤐.ᐟ] - Н3, я н3 н@шёл к с0ж@л3н1ю. Эт0 прRм н@д0 мн0г0 ч3г0 пр0в3р1ть, а н3 0днY м3стн0сть, и т0 н3б0льшYю 3ё ч@сть. Эт0 3щё н@д0 Yт0чн1ть, к@к 0н0 выглRд1т, н0 эт п0зж3. С3йч@с л3нь з@н1м@тьсR п01ск@м1. З@т0 3сть 1д3йк@, ч3м з@нRтьсR! - - - - - - З3е33рст000!! Ты к@к? Х0ч3шь 3сть, 1л1 чт0-т0 3щё?? :D ₊˚ ✧ ━━━━⊱⋆⊰━━━━ ✧ ₊˚

🤩1

10 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC9 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

・┆✦-Cool Noob! ;p-✦ ┆・ ₊˚ ✧ ━━━━⊱⋆⊰━━━━ ✧ ₊˚ [ִ ࣪𖤐.ᐟ] - Б3Б33Б С3йч@с х0тR-бы н3 т@к скYчн0, к@к р@ньш3. Т1п0 я н3 0д1н тYт, и эт0 крYч3 н@мн0г0! :D П0 кр@йн3 м3р3, 0х0т@ ст@л@ кYд@ л3гч3 длR м3нR! С3йч@с х0чY п0пыт@тьсR н@йт1 0рYж13 З3рст0, н0 зн@R чт0 л3с н3 м@л3ньк1й Rвн0, пр1дётсR пр0в3рRть мн000г000, а эт н3 крYт0! Н0 я н3 с0б1р@юсь к@к-т0 д@л3к0 Yх0д1ть, мб н3 д@л3к0 п01щY. ₊˚ ✧ ━━━━⊱⋆⊰━━━━ ✧ ₊˚

🤩1

2 Aug 2026, 00:51 UTC19 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

・┆✦-Cool Noob! ;p-✦ ┆・ ₊˚ ✧ ━━━━⊱⋆⊰━━━━ ✧ ₊˚ [ִ ࣪𖤐.ᐟ] - д@ п0ж@лYйст@! Пр0ст0 ст@р@йсR п0т0м 3г0 н3 кл@сть кYд@ п0п@л0. 0рYж1R н3 1грYшк@ всё ж3, 0с0б3нн0 3сл1 ты Yб1йц@. Т@к-т0 дYм@ю, чт0 н@м Yж3 лYчш3 п0йт1 1ск@ть к0г0-т0 в к@ч3ств3 ж3ртвы. ₊˚ ✧ ━━━━⊱⋆⊰━━━━ ✧ ₊˚

❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 00:29 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026

・┆✦-Cool Noob! ;p-✦ ┆・ ₊˚ ✧ ━━━━⊱⋆⊰━━━━ ✧ ₊˚ [ִ ࣪𖤐.ᐟ] - НY.. Д3р3вь3в мн0г0, т@к чт0 эт0о0 бYд3т сл0жн0 н@йт1. Я н3 пр0т1в, р@з пр3дл@г@ю! М0ж3т д@ж3 вм3ст3 б0льш3 выж1вш1х бYд3м л0в1ть, чт0 крYт0! >:D ₊˚ ✧ ━━━━⊱⋆⊰━━━━ ✧ ₊˚

2 Aug 2026, 00:21 UTC15 viewsread 12 August 2026

・┆✦-Cool Noob! ;p-✦ ┆・ ₊˚ ✧ ━━━━⊱⋆⊰━━━━ ✧ ₊˚ [ִ ࣪𖤐.ᐟ] - Н3 крYт0 к0н3чн0, чт0 0рYж13 п0т3рRл. Н@д3юсь, см0ж3шь н@йт1, 3сл1 ты, к0н3чн0 п0мн1шь, гд3 пр1м3рн0 0н0 был0. В00бщ3, я м0гY в ц3л0м с т0б0й пр0д1ть, п0к@ н3 н@йдёшь. Мн3 всё р@вн0 скYчн0 0дн0мY, д@ и т3б3 п0м0г@ть бYдY. :) ₊˚ ✧ ━━━━⊱⋆⊰━━━━ ✧ ₊˚

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SWAPau_Noob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 509,853 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“H3@DSH0T B@BY, Y0U D13D XD” (@SWAPau_Noob), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SWAPau_Noob.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.