Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

南科大今天完了吗

@SUSTechGG

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,531subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001385916744
TypeChannel
Username@SUSTechGG
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SUSTechGG

Growth

2,5312,5342,532.56 August 2026 — 2,533 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,534 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,533 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,531 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,531–2,534 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:272,531-2
10 Aug 2026, 04:352,533-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:442,534+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:482,533first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 14 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

830 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣28734.6%
😁17020.5%
🏆13716.5%
💯455.42%
404.82%
🤯303.61%
💊293.49%
👍242.89%
🕊212.53%
🤡141.69%
💩91.08%
👏50.602%
40.482%
🆒40.482%
🤔40.482%
🐳30.361%
🔥30.361%
🤮10.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 830reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2024 to 14 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Oct 2025, 07:21 UTC≈7,140 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

SZ|高校四有书咖在放假期间遭同学洗劫 一、事情经过 国庆放假回来后,咖啡店的店员发现店内饮品数量出现异常。冰箱里原本有的牛奶、康普茶、面包和酒类等物品大量消失。店长说:“台风到国庆假期这十来天,丢了18桶牛奶、17瓶康普茶,一堆面包,和《贵重饮品》。新买的《贵重饮品》没动过,给我们喝的就剩一个底子了。” 与此同时,学校宿舍管理部门也在同一时间处理了另一件相关事件——有学生在凌晨翻越荔园四栋铁门被宿舍管员发现。这名学生在翻阅过程中,直接将闸机弄掉了。但在沟通过程中,该学生最初拒绝透露身份,并谎称自己是树仁书院学生(后被确认为其他书院的学生),且进入小店的行动已经得到了店长的同意(实则店长是完全不知情的)。 这两件事应该是两个人干的,具体情况还在核实。 二、监控与初步调查 店长在反馈给辅导员之后也找到了监控确认,发现这位男士在凌晨多次打开冰箱。其行为大约是:凌晨一点多打开冰箱,看了下没人拿,三点多就直接偷了。 目前,四有书咖还没

😁32🤯1311🐳3

17 Sept 2025, 04:42 UTC≈18,000 views242 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

南科大旋转路标是其他高校永远无法超越的巅峰

🏆137🤣85👍10💊73

19 Jun 2025, 17:07 UTC≈6,770 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁42🤯17👏54🤣41

19 Jun 2025, 10:14 UTC≈5,850 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣37💯5

9 Apr 2025, 09:34 UTC≈7,430 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣41🤡12👍63🔥2

9 Jan 2025, 13:12 UTC≈8,690 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#投稿 萨斯克泰

🕊21😁13💩7👍4💊4🆒41🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @SUSTechGG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,237,115 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“南科大今天完了吗” (@SUSTechGG), 2,531 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SUSTechGG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.