Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

FINANCIAL FREEDOM 💰

@SUNILPREMIUMCALL

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

1,263subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001126107156
TypeChannel
Username@SUNILPREMIUMCALL
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SUNILPREMIUMCALL

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@eqiti/1163831 Jul 2026, 02:28 UTC@SUNILPREMIUMCALL/28082 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 03:21 UTC0.9853 minutes
@eqiti/1163228 Jul 2026, 03:31 UTC@SUNILPREMIUMCALL/28077 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 03:32 UTC0.98under a minute
@eqiti/116434 Aug 2026, 02:58 UTC@SUNILPREMIUMCALL/28088 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 03:39 UTC0.9741 minutes
@eqiti/1163329 Jul 2026, 03:31 UTC@SUNILPREMIUMCALL/28078 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 03:37 UTC0.975 minutes
@SUNILPREMIUMCALL/28085 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC@eqiti/116403 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC0.974 minutes
@SUNILPREMIUMCALL/28087 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC@eqiti/116423 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC0.964 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@eqiti9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.965 minutes@eqiti (63)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @eqiti. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,2631,2671,2656 August 2026 — 1,267 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,267 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,265 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,263 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,262–1,268 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:371,263-2
9 Aug 2026, 12:381,265-2
6 Aug 2026, 08:151,267no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:191,267first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 1,263 subscribers
Avg views / post
176
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,528
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC≈120 viewsread 6 August 2026

10 Important Personal Finance Rules!💰 Spend a few minutes reading some extremely useful and important personal finance rules.⬇️ Bookmark It!🎯💯 1. Rule of 72 (Double Your Money) 2. Rule of 114 (Triple) 3. Rule of 144 (Quadruple) 4. Rule of 70 (Inflation) 5. 50-30-20 Rule 6. 3X Emergency Rule 7. 40℅ EMI Rule 8. Life Insurance Rule 9. Rule of 10 10. The 4% Rule 1. Rule of 72: No. of yrs required to double your money

5 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC≈137 viewsread 6 August 2026

*Larsen & Toubro:* Shareholders approved the transfer of the company's realty undertaking to wholly owned subsidiary L&T Realty Properties with 99.07% votes in favour. (Neutral) Circuit filter change from 5% to 20%: Triveni Engineering. (Neutral) Circuit filter change from 20% to 10%: Indo Thai Securities. (Neutral) List of stocks excluded from ASM Framework: BlueStone, E2E Networks, Sri Lotus. (Neutral) List of

5 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC≈120 viewsread 6 August 2026

*🌹🇮🇳India Daybook – Stocks in News* *Deepak Nitrite:* Q1 FY27 Net Profit at Rs. 345 crore vs Rs. 112 crore YoY. Revenue at Rs. 2,578 crore vs Rs. 1,890 crore YoY. (Positive) *Hindustan Foods:* Q1 FY27 Net Profit at Rs. 43 crore vs Rs. 32 crore YoY. Revenue at Rs. 1,200 crore vs Rs. 995 crore YoY. (Positive) *Optiemus Infracom:* Q1 FY27 Net Profit at Rs. 21 crore vs Rs. 15 crore YoY. Revenue at Rs. 883 crore vs Rs.

5 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC≈127 viewsread 6 August 2026

*Rajesh Power:* Company has secured Major ₹362.83 Crore Order from PGVCL. (Positive) *Butterfly Gandhimathi Appliances:* Q1 FY27 Net Profit at Rs. 8.9 crore vs Rs. 6.4 crore YoY. Revenue at Rs. 200 crore vs Rs. 190 crore YoY. (Neutral) *Bharti Airtel:* Q1 FY27 Net Profit at Rs. 8,167 crore vs Rs. 7,300 crore QoQ. Revenue at Rs. 58,539 crore vs Rs. 55,383 crore QoQ. (Neutral) *Thirumalai Chemicals:* Q1 FY27 Net Los

4 Aug 2026, 03:39 UTC≈146 viewsread 6 August 2026

🌹🇮🇳India Daybook – Stocks in News Great Eastern Shipping Company: Q1 FY27 Consolidated Net Profit at Rs. 1,310 crore vs Rs. 504 crore YoY. Revenue at Rs. 2,005 crore vs Rs. 1,200 crore YoY. (Positive) Gulf Oil Lubricants: Q1 FY27 Net Profit at Rs. 127 crore vs Rs. 97 crore YoY. Revenue at Rs. 132 crore vs Rs. 100 crore YoY. (Positive) Borosil Scientific: Q1 FY27 Net Profit at Rs. 4.4 crore vs loss of Rs. 4.2 crore

4 Aug 2026, 03:39 UTC≈173 viewsread 6 August 2026

SBI Funds: Q1 FY27 Net Profit stood at Rs. 873 crore vs Rs. 845 crore YoY. Revenue stood at Rs. 1146 crore vs Rs. 995 crore YoY. (Neutral) Samhi Hotels: Q1 FY27 Net Profit stood at Rs. 18 crore vs Rs. 17 crore YoY. Revenue stood at Rs. 305 crore vs Rs. 272 crore YoY. (Neutral) Piramal Pharma: Company resumed operations at its Ahmedabad facilities following flood disruption. (Neutral) United Spirits: Company filed

3 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC≈176 viewsread 6 August 2026

Indian Oil Corporation (IOC): Q1 FY27 Net Loss stood at Rs. 2,661 crore vs a profit of Rs. 11,377 crore QoQ. Revenue stood at Rs. 2.76 lakh crore vs Rs. 2.32 lakh crore QoQ. (Neutral) Maruti Suzuki: Q1 FY27 Standalone Net Profit stood at Rs. 3,352 crore vs Rs. 3,710 crore YoY (Est. Rs. 3,264 crore). Revenue stood at Rs. 52,456 crore vs Rs. 38,400 crore YoY (Est. Rs. 52,580 crore). (Neutral) Bajaj Holdings & Investm

3 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC≈152 viewsread 6 August 2026

Tata Motors PV: July Auto Sales at 63,760 Units Vs Est Of 60,000 Units (Positive) M&M: July Tractor Sales at 34,420 Units Vs Est Of 32,500 Units (Positive) Escorts: July tractor sales rises 22% year-on-year to 8,731 units Est 8100 units (Positive) Tata Motors CV: July Auto Sales at 39,641 Units Vs Est Of 36,600 Units (Positive) Atul Auto: July Sales Up 39.9% At 3,800 Units Vs 2,717 Units (YoY) (Positive) Steel S

3 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC≈148 viewsread 6 August 2026

🌹🇮🇳India Daybook – Stocks in News Divi's Laboratories: Q1 FY27 Net Profit stood at Rs. 902 crore vs Rs. 545 crore YoY. Revenue stood at Rs. 3,080 crore vs Rs. 2,400 crore YoY. (Positive) Gujarat Ambuja Exports: Q1 FY27 Net Profit stood at Rs. 177 crore vs Rs. 65.4 crore YoY. Revenue stood at Rs. 1,600 crore vs Rs. 1,300 crore YoY. (Positive) Nilkamal: Q1 FY27 Net Profit stood at Rs. 24.3 crore vs Rs. 15.2 crore Yo

31 Jul 2026, 03:29 UTC≈243 viewsread 6 August 2026

*News Headlines from Business News Agencies:* *Business Standard* 📝 UP lines up ₹6 trn investment projects, targets ₹8 trn for GBC 5.0 📝 RIICO gets 449 applications for 240 industrial plots in Rajasthan 📝Industry concerns prompt GSTN to defer proposed e-way bill enhancements 📝 SpaceX tightens supply chain rules, excludes Chinese nationals, components 📝M3M India to invest ₹600 crore to build commercial project in Gu

31 Jul 2026, 03:21 UTC≈166 viewsread 6 August 2026

🌹🇮🇳India Daybook – Stocks in News Aarti Ind: Q1 FY27 Net Profit at Rs. 155 crore vs Rs. 43 crore YoY. Revenue at Rs. 2387 crore vs Rs. 1676 crore YoY. (Positive) AWL Agri Business: Q1 FY27 Net Profit at Rs. 350 crore vs Rs. 236 crore YoY. Revenue at Rs. 20,048 crore vs Rs. 17,100 crore YoY. (Positive) Rainbow Children's Medicare: Q1 FY27 Net Profit at Rs. 60.6 crore vs Rs. 53.4 crore YoY. Revenue at Rs. 470 crore

31 Jul 2026, 03:21 UTC≈221 viewsread 6 August 2026

Global Health: Q1 FY27 Consolidated Net Profit at Rs. 159 crore vs Rs. 159 crore YoY. Revenue at Rs. 1,300 crore vs Rs. 1,030 crore YoY. (Neutral) Swiggy: Q1 FY27 Consolidated Net Loss at Rs. 790 crore vs Net Loss of Rs. 1,200 crore YoY. Revenue at Rs. 6,800 crore vs Rs. 4,960 crore YoY. (Neutral) NSDL: Q1 FY27 Net Profit stood at Rs. 98 crore vs Rs. 89 crore YoY. Revenue stood at Rs. 516 crore vs Rs. 312 crore YoY

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SUNILPREMIUMCALL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FINANCIAL FREEDOM 💰” (@SUNILPREMIUMCALL), 1,263 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SUNILPREMIUMCALL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.