8>>100..

Channel
𝓢𝙪𝓶𝙞𝙣 𝓢𝙤𝓵𝙤🧉
@SUMINDD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003053402007 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SUMINDD |
| Description | связь со мной: @suminofi_bot мой архив: @archivesuminn |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SUMINDD |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 14 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 14 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 127.5%
- avg views ÷ 14 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 17.9
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 6.10%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 357 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 55
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 13
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 4 | 80.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
▫️ 🎁🎀🎀🌟udition 😺 🎀🎀 愛 bąbý, ļ’m ǎ møņştęr! 👊🏻 ➿➖➿➖➿➖➿➖➿➖➿ 赫吉姆 – ⲏᥲⳝ𐔖ρ ⲃ ⲏ𐔖ⲃ𐔤ю ⲕᥲⲃᥱρ 𐔏ρ𐔤ᥒᥒ𐔤 ᥴ ᥒρ𐔖ⲧ𐔖ⲧυᥒ𐔖ⲙ bᥲb𐔤ⲙ𐔖ᥒ᥉tᥱr ! ) ) 🌟ųşy – rᥙkᥲ&ᥲ᥉ᥲ 🎁 🌟řęe – 𐔖t4 ➿➖➿➖➿➖➿➖➿➖➿ – ᥲⲏⲕᥱⲧᥲ υ ᥒρᥲⲃυ᥈ᥲ ⲃ ⲕ𐔖ⲙⲙᥱⲏⲧᥲρυяⲭ. 🎀🎀🍭 🌟🌟🌟 – @nastycgbotbot 💎🎀🎀💍 🌟🌟🌟 – @nastycvg
❤1
. ݁₊ ⊹ 🌸 *🎀ᥙ𝑑𝕚𝕥𝕚𝑜ꪀ ͡꒱ 🤩 ⋆。˚ -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈ 🤩 ﹒⌗﹒🍧﹒౨ৎ˚₊‧ ρ𝕣᧐𝕥𝑜𝕥𝕪𝕡ᥱ ⋮ 🤩 ꩜ 𝕗𝕣ᥱᥱ : @ⲱ𝕚ꪀ𝕥𝕖𝕣 @Ⳓ𝕚𝕤ᥱᥣℓ𝐞 ❝ . 𝕥ᥲ𝕜ᥱꪀ : 𝕠𝕥𝟤 ⋆˚𝜗𝜚˚⋆ 🎂 ༉‧₊ 𓏲 ๋࣭ ࣪ ˖🫙˚.ᵎ .𝕚ꪀf𝑜 જ⁀➴ • 🍥 ⋆⭒˚.⋆ ᥲн̫κᥱᴛᥲ ᥙ ᥰρᥲʙᥙ᧘ᥲ в̫ κ᧐ⲙⲙᥱнᴛᥲρᥙя᥊ ᥫ᭡.ִֶָ𓂃 🍩
유. 𝑽𝑰𝑹ꪊ𝑺 ֗ ּ 🛍 ִ۫ ᤳ ミ ࣪ . 𝐀UDITION »› 🍁 ' ⓘ 𝐈'm make it lemonade . . ۫ ੭ . 🦄 𝐖ꫀׁׅ α𝗋e virus!! ׅ 𝅄 ۪ ֹ 𝅄 ▭ ⦅ 🌺 🔥⦆. . нᴀбᴏᴩ на Жизель!! ᴀнᴋᴇᴛᴀ ʙ ᴋᴏʍʍᴇнᴛᴀᴩиях real bad business ...** ۫ . tׁׅgc :: @viruscv 🎁 ۫ . sִenɬִ ɬִo :: @demons_cvbot •° . tik tok: @rin_port #t𝗿ꭎᥱ #virus #rin #muya #sunny
Sticker, posted without a caption
в моем тикток новое видео!
Sticker, posted without a caption
⊹ ᩠ 痛み ^ > 𝓐𝗎𝗱ı𝘁ֺıᦅ𝗻︢︣ < ^ ᯏ ۪ I3usy : 𝗏ᧉ𝗿ִ𝗻𐐫𝗻 fr3e : òť6 🌙:heaven's hella boring, is this all? 𝓐𝗻︢︣𝗸︪︩𝝴ׅ𝘁ֺ [💛] ⭐:Uh, word travels fast - it's all a buzz again and 𝗿𝞄𝗹𝝴𝘀 𝝸๋𝗻۪ 𝗰𑄝ֺꭑ᳢ꭑ᳢𝝴𝗻۪𝘁 𝗽ֺ𝗹𝝴ׅ𐐼sׅ𝝴ׅ 𝗺̈ᦅɾ𝝴ׅ ɾ𝝴ׅ𐐼𝗰ׅ𝘁ֺıᦅ𝗻︢︣
🎀🩵ᣟ݂𝐓𝐡‧𝐞-𝐓𝕚𝐟‧𝐟𝐢 🎀🎀ᴜᴅ𝕚ᴛɪᴏɴ🎀 🤩➿➖➿➖➿🤩 « ᥣι𝗸ᥱ 𝕚'ⲙ ⳋ𐔖ᥒᥒᥲ ᥣι᥎ᥱ 𝕗𐔖𝗿ᥱ᥎ᥱ𝗿 😇 🎀𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐲 ¡ .❤️. Rora 🎀😏 🎀✨ 𝕗𝐫𝐞𝐞 . 💍. от6 ✨ 🎀 " ᥕᥱ 𝕗𐔖rᥱ᥎ᥱr, 𐔥𐔖rᥱ᥎ᥱr, 𝕗𐔖rᥱ᥎ᥱr ᥱ᥎ᥱr ᥱ᥎ᥱr 🤩➿➖➿➖➿🤩 ❝ 𝗕𝗔𝗕𝗬𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗥 & 𝗪𝗜𝗡𝗫 😏 🤩➿➖ ➿➖➿🤩 ✨ 🎀𝕟ⲕ𝕖ⲧᥲ a&d 🎀uℓes :: 𝕚ᥒ ᥴ𐔖ⲙⲙ ✨ ✈️— @thetiffi #TheTiffi #ⲏᥲⳝ𐔖ρ! #𝔸𝕦𝕕𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟 #truewin𝕩 #babymonster¡!
изи, я ьебя люблю🥹🫶🏻
💘1
❤️❤️❤️
💘1
с той же девочкой
💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SUMINDD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 627,230 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@GLOWINGOI · 292 posts🐆AEMORY
@aemoryoii · 31 postAUD»//𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗢𝗪𓂃🛡𝓐𝔩𝔩𝔬𝔴
@allowcvg · 951 post£𝐔𝕏𝚇𝐸ׅ꯱ //𝘖𝐈"
@Luxxes_oii · 621 post𝗮𝘂𝗱. ‘ 𝓝𝗮𝘀𝖙𝗒
@nastycvg · 151 post𝘴𝘶𝘮𝘪 ⁑ ᦓꪮꪶꪮ
@sumien7 · 841 post𓈒 ۟ 𝗔𝗨𝗗 💎ᣟ݂𝐓𝐡‧𝐞-𝐓𝕚𝐟‧𝐟𝐢
@thetiffi · 461 postsoon rsult ⊹ ᩠ 痛み ^ 𝘁᤻𝘂᳢᳢ׅ𝝸๋𝘃𝗲۫. [🖤]
@tuivebstoff · 231 post‘𝙫𝙞𝙧𝙪𝙣𝙜 [赤あ]
@virungoi · 301 post𝖵𝖨ℜ𝖴𝖲 | 𝖺𝗎𝖽 🛍
@viruscv · 611 post𖥔 ࣪ 𝗫𝕳𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗧 «💞»
@xheartgg · 71 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@SUMINDD named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝓢𝙪𝓶𝙞𝙣 𝓢𝙤𝓵𝙤🧉” (@SUMINDD), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SUMINDD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.