Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for S7 Anti-Ban (Notification Channel)

Channel

S7 Anti-Ban (Notification Channel)

@SU7QF886

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,601subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002433707729
TypeChannel
Username@SU7QF886
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SU7QF886

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,6013,6293,61522 August 2026 — 3,627 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,627 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,629 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,618 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,621 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,617 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,616 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,608 subscribers17 September 2026 — 3,601 subscribers22 August 202617 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 26 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,597–3,633 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 09:163,601-7
13 Sept 2026, 03:153,608-8
9 Sept 2026, 05:203,616-1
4 Sept 2026, 04:023,617-4
31 Aug 2026, 18:433,621+3
28 Aug 2026, 15:373,618-11
26 Aug 2026, 00:433,629+2
22 Aug 2026, 14:453,627no change
22 Aug 2026, 14:303,627first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

62 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6096.8%
11.61%
😡11.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC57 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026

如果需要测试就加一下我q 我给你找人测试

👍4

Signed xb

22 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC78 viewsread 22 August 2026

目前z9turbo的preload.so已经编译完成,不过SELinux目前还是被拦截,(坏消息:我的token快用完了)😂😂

Signed 伪善 『资本家』

22 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC99 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026

主要还是搞米系的,iq的纯是费力不讨好

👍3😡1

Signed 伪善 『资本家』

22 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC104 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026

高版本不用想,如果真的想搞,请降级橘子4,但是麻烦程度不亚于重新买个root机

👍6

Signed 伪善 『资本家』

22 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC102 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026

测试版本,解的橘子6的全量包搞提权,v和iq的不太好搞,最终版会通知的

👍6

Signed 伪善 『资本家』

22 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC105 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

23tg号年就能成为老资历了吗这有点招笑了😂😂

👍3

Signed xb

22 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC110 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026

酷安上已经有人发了搞不出来

👍3

Signed xb

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SU7QF886. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“S7 Anti-Ban (Notification Channel)” (@SU7QF886), 3,601 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SU7QF886.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.