Channel
@STop1n
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
234subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003764997784 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @STop1n |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/STop1n |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 234 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 235 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 240 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 243 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 245 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 238 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 238 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
35 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5319164206929426020 | 31 | 88.6% | |
| custom 5316762594361488556 | 4 | 11.4% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/STopi_Saint/5619 Привет ! Сейчас я подробно разъясню насчет комментариев под этим тейком. И приведу некие доказательства почему же лепер скопировала подачу,название и мб даже оформление у Серены (девочка из ру комьюнити). На первых двух скринах если вы не сидите сори за выражение с хуями в глазах можно заметить очень большую схожесть в подаче, и даже в оформлении. Просто у Лепер посты немного в другом по…
Signed Я твою маму ебал олух
Привет! это фото к тексту ниже который я кину, можешь пожалуйста это все выложить одним постом, у меня просто почему-то так не отправляется все вместе
Signed Я твою маму ебал олух
Извините, сколько бы раз я не пыталась закрыть на это глаза, но как такое может быть. В ру км, в запад км, в осд км, в селеб км, как бы не срали всех за оформу, особенно админы, для начала взгляните на.. Свои баннеры блевотня чистая, это разве красиво?
Signed Я твою маму ебал олух
Ребят а где другие админы? Где аля.....
Signed Я твою маму ебал олух
Скоро вы наговорите настолько что вам всем снесут аккаунты
custom 53191642069294260202
Signed Я твою маму ебал олух
у пани очень красивая оформа. ещё интерактивы всегда интересные, что тоже большой плюс
custom 53191642069294260203
Signed Я твою маму ебал олух
люблю архив лими по сэди
custom 53191642069294260205
Signed Я твою маму ебал олух
Куда пропала сэми?
Signed Я твою маму ебал олух
интересно, а мы будем долго молчать про то, что когда паня пробила ралю, она сделала это неправильно и в итоге она высмеяла вообще чужих, ничего не сделавших людей?) ещё и сделала это через глаз бога
custom 53191642069294260209custom 53167625943614885564
Signed Я твою маму ебал олух
у даянн очень хороший архив. про подачу вообще молчу-одна из самых удобных, которые я когда либо видела
custom 53191642069294260205
Signed Я твою маму ебал олух
очень люблю этот архив, посты-красота
custom 53191642069294260207
Signed koтoff
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @STop1n. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПОДСЛУШАНО ОСД КМ” (@STop1n), 234 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/STop1n.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.