Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 75 comparable posts for this entry, running 15 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @CRYPTOO_STAR_CH. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
62 measurements spanning 94 days, net +724. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,187–21,775 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 15:11
17,915
-26
8 Nov 2026, 06:07
17,941
-15
7 Nov 2026, 00:14
17,956
-10
5 Nov 2026, 22:44
17,966
-17
4 Nov 2026, 21:19
17,983
-11
3 Nov 2026, 22:26
17,994
-3
2 Nov 2026, 22:32
17,997
-2
1 Nov 2026, 23:29
17,999
-24
1 Nov 2026, 00:37
18,023
-24
31 Oct 2026, 01:06
18,047
-172
30 Oct 2026, 00:06
18,219
-33
29 Oct 2026, 00:59
18,252
+3,096
28 Oct 2026, 02:30
15,156
+1,863
27 Oct 2026, 01:17
13,293
-48
26 Oct 2026, 01:20
13,341
-6
24 Oct 2026, 23:25
13,347
-10
24 Oct 2026, 01:50
13,357
-8
23 Oct 2026, 02:16
13,365
-16
21 Oct 2026, 21:51
13,381
-19
20 Oct 2026, 17:14
13,400
first reading
Engagement
96 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.6%
avg views ÷ 17,915 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,970
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
28
of 96 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
96 (15 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
83,230
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 04:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,790
Videos
≈17
Links
≈387
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 95 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ST_CSTAR. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 96 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴 سقوط بیت کوین به زیر ۷۴٬۰۰۰ دلار؛ ۴ زنگ خطر برای BTC کدامند؟
📊 قیمت بیت کوین از شب قبل با فشار فروش زیادی روبهرو شده و تحت تاثیر ۴ عامل زیر به زیر ۷۴٬۰۰۰ دلار سقوط کرده.
۱- از دست رفتن حمایت مهم ۷۵٬۷۰۰ دلار
۲- خروج سرمایهگذارهای نهادی: فقط طی دو روز قبل بیشتر از ۸۰۰ میلیون سرمایه از ETFهای اسپات بیت کوین خارج شده.
۳- کاهش فشار خرید بازار اسپات
۴- اعلام نتایج انتخابات کنگره آمریکا و نگرانی سرمایهگذارها از فشار…
📌 آیا ایلان ماسک همان ساتوشی ناکاموتو است؟ نتایج تحلیل جدید توسط هوش مصنوعی گروک
🖥 یه پژوهش جدید با استفاده از هوش مصنوعی گروک و تحلیل سبک نوشتاری نشون میده نوشتههای ایلان ماسک شباهت چندانی به ساتوشی ناکاموتو، خالق بیت کوین، ندارن و در این بررسی سبک نوشتاری هال فینی به ساتوشی نزدیکتر از ایلان ماسک بود.
🔸این تحلیل روی سه ادعا تمرکز داشت؛ ساتوشی در ۹۵.۳ درصد موارد بعد از نقطه دو فاصله میذاشت ولی در پستهای ماس…
🔴 نرخ بیکاری آمریکا کاهش پیدا کرد
🖥 دادههای اشتغال منتشر شد و بهتر از انتظارات بود؛ به طوریکه مشخص شد ۱۶۵٬۰۰۰ شغل در ماه قبل ایجاد شده و نرخ بیکاری از ۴.۲ به ۴.۱ درصد رسیده است.
🔸 این آمار احتمال افزایش نرخ بهره را بیشتر کرده و میتواند با تقویت دلار، بر قیمت طلا، بیت کوین و بازار سهام فشار وارد کند.
🤩
🟠 تحلیلگر مطرح: وال استریت رالیهای بیت کوین رو نابود کرده!
🖥 مارکوس تیلن باور داره دوران جهشهای پیاپی و دورقمی بیت کوین به پایان رسیده، چون فروش قراردادهای اختیار خرید توسط معاملهگرهای والاستریت و برداشت سود نهنگها ساختار بازار رو تغییر داده و مانع جهشهای انفجاری شده.
🔸تیلن برآورد میکنه که بازارگردانها سهمی تا حدود نصف از ۶۰ میلیارد دلار ورود خالص سرمایه به ETFهای اسپات بیت کوین رو در اختیار دارن که ا…
🟠 بیت کوین ۸۰٬۰۰۰ دلار رو پس گرفت؛ هدف بعدی کجاست؟
📊 بیت کوین بعد از افت تا ۷۵۶۱۸ دلار به خاطر نتایج انتخابات آمریکا، دوباره رشد کرد و تا اطراف ۸۱,۰۰۰ دلار بالا رفت، ولی برای این که جلوی یه ریزش سنگینتر رو بگیره، باید بتونه حمایت میانگین متحرک ۵۰ هفتهای خودش رو حفظ کنه.
🔸ریزش موقت قیمت به زیر ۷۶٬۰۰۰ دلار باعث شد موقعیتهای خرید معاملهگرها لیکویید بشه و مجموع ارزش لیکوییدیشنهای بازار کریپتو در ۲۴ ساعت به ۲۸۸…
📌 رمزارز Zcash پس از پیروزی دموکراتها در هر دو مجلس جان گرفت.
قیمت ابتدا افت کرد. انضباط مالی میتواند رشد و ریسکپذیری را تضعیف کند؛ بستن موقعیتهای انباشته با انتظار کاهش محرک مالی شاید افت بازده اوراق خزانه آمریکا و دلار را توضیح دهد.
مقاومت روزانه 1,380
قیمت به 1,380 نزدیک شده است؛ ناکامی در عبور ممکن است حمایت 1,031 را مطرح کند؛ شکست مقاومت میتواند راه 1,692 را باز کند.
حمایت خط روند صعودی H1
حفظ خط روند …
🟠 بیت کوین در آستانه سقوط به زیر ۷۶ هزار دلار؟
📊 بیت کوین پس از ناکامی در عبور از مقاومت ۷۸٬۵۰۰ دلار، دوباره به زیر ۷۷ هزار دلار برگشت. تحلیلگران هشدار میدهند که محدوده ۷۶٬۰۰۰ تا ۷۶٬۶۰۰ دلار، مهمترین حمایت فعلی بازار است و شکست آن میتواند قیمت را تا ۷۵٬۷۰۰ یا حتی ۷۳٬۱۰۰ دلار پایین ببرد.
🤩
🔴 بایننس اعلام کرد که امروز ، برداشت وجه به صورت مرحلهای از سر گرفته خواهد شد، و این کار از ساعت 06:00 تا 09:00 به وقت جهانی هماهنگ (UTC) آغاز میشود.
🤩
🟠 بیت کوین ۱۸ ساله شد؛ راز ساتوشی و ثروت ۸۵ میلیارد دلاری او
🖥 وایتپیپر بیت کوین ۱۸ ساله شده و در این مدت، قیمت BTC به حدود ۷۷,۷۲۰ دلار و ارزش کل بازارش به حدود ۱.۶۵ تریلیون دلار رسیده، در حالی که هویت خالقش هنوز نامعلومه.
🔸محققها حدود ۱.۱ میلیون BTC رو به ساتوشی ناکاموتو نسبت میدن که ارزشش حدود ۸۵ میلیارد دلار میرسه و هر حرکتی در کیف پولهای مرتبط باهاش میتونه بازار رو حسابی نگران کنه.
🔸توسعهدهندهای…
📌 راز رشد هایپرلیکویید در بازار نزولی؛ درآمد میلیونی بدون وابستگی به معاملات
📊 طبق گزارش گریاسکیل، کوینبیس توافق کرده حدود ۹۰ درصد از سود حاصل از ذخایر پشتوانه ۶ میلیارد دلار USDC در هایپرلیکویید رو به این پلتفرم پرداخت کنه.
🔸هدف کوینبیس از این توافق، گسترش استفاده از USDC در هایپرلیکوییده. در مقابل، هایپرلیکویید هر ماه درآمدی به دست میاره که به تعداد و حجم معاملات کاربران وابسته نیست.
🔸این صرافی در ماه سپتا…
🔴 جمعه سیاه بازارهای مالی؛ چرا بیت کوین، طلا، نقره و سهام با هم سقوط کردن؟
🖥 روز قبل بازارهای مالی با فشار فروش زیادی روبهرو شدن. برای مثال قیمت طلا به ۳٬۸۷۵ دلار رسید که پایینترین سطحش در ۱ سال گذشتهست. نقره هم با ریزش ۵.۸ درصدی به زیر ۵۰ دلار یعنی ۴۹.۱۳ دلار سقوط کرد.
🔸 از طرفی افزایش قیمت نفت نگرانیهای تورمی رو بیشتر کرده و احتمال افزایش نرخ بهره توی جلسه دسامبر (آذر) به بیشتر از ۷۰ درصد رسیده.
🔸بازار…
Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @ST_CSTAR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @ST_CSTAR as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
26 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
26 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
19 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ST_CSTAR named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@weex_star named in 2 posts, 25 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 · confirmed gone 3 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
اخبار کریپتو و ارز | ارز دیجیتال و بیتکوین @irbtc · 18,226 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 4 October 2026
𝖳𝖱𝗂𝗅𝗅𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖦𝖺𝗆𝖾 @Trilion_Games · 21,705 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 September 2026
🇮🇷signal |𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺 @bestcheque · 136,846 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 26 August 2026
سیگنال کرپیتو || تحلیل کرپیتو ||💸👑KING OF CRYPTO 👑💵 @king_of_crypto_ir · 250,040 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 13 August 2026
𝑪𝑹𝒀𝑷𝑻𝑶𝑶_𝑨𝑩 @cryptoo_ab · 246,832 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 August 2026
[ 𝖲𝖨𝖦𝖭𝖠𝖫 𝖯𝖤𝖱𝖲𝖨𝖠𝖭 ] سیگنال @signaIpersian · 52,995 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
🎖 BankSignal | ارز دیجیتال 🎖 @BankSiignal · 29,519 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 7 September 2026
𝘛𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘶𝘺𝘯𝘦 𝘛𝘦𝘢𝘮 | ᴮᵘˡˡ | @Tethruyne_team · 84,120 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 8 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚜️CRYPTOO STAR⚜️” (@ST_CSTAR), 17,915 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ST_CSTAR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.