Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bassines Non Merci | Canal d'infos sur la luttes contre les mégabassines

Channel

Bassines Non Merci | Canal d'infos sur la luttes contre les mégabassines

@STOPmegabassines

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

8,906subscribers

-55 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002009135952
TypeChannel
Username@STOPmegabassines
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/STOPmegabassines

Growth

8,9068,9618,933.57 August 2026 — 8,961 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,961 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,956 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,946 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,944 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,932 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,912 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,906 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 23 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,898–8,969 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 01:348,906-6
26 Aug 2026, 19:558,912-20
23 Aug 2026, 13:358,932-12
19 Aug 2026, 14:378,944-2
13 Aug 2026, 03:538,946-10
10 Aug 2026, 03:418,956-5
7 Aug 2026, 12:008,961no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:488,961first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.6%
avg views ÷ 8,906 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,100
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held26 (21 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total37,757
Reactions total745
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 16s
Average length
2m 05s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,071 reactions across 26 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍39837.2%
29127.2%
🔥23121.6%
🤬656.07%
👏615.70%
🥰131.21%
😱70.654%
😢30.28%
👎20.187%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,071reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC985 views30 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

💦 MÉGABASSINES IMPACTS SUR L’ENVIRONNEMENT ET ACCAPAREMENT DE L'EAU, c'est le sujet de la conférence débat organisée par La Boussole Saintaise ! Cela aura lieu le 4 septembre à 19H - 7 rue Lacurie à Saintes (17), en présence de Julien Le Guet et également de Bassines Non Merci 17 ! Retenez la date ! Une belle occasion de se retrouver pour cette rentrée !

👍1713

26 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC782 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @cruebnm86Photo

La CRUE approche, voici les conseils transmis par la LegalTeam86 🔥

🥰108🔥7👍4

26 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC≈1,030 views45 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Face aux sécheresses, quelles mesures pour préserver nos ressources en eau ? L’irrigation de l’agriculture, et notamment celle du maïs, consomme énormément d’eau et “contribue massivement aux sécheresses” et à l’assèchement généralisé des sols et des cours d’eau. Agnès Ducharne, climatologue et hydrologue, directrice de recherche au CNRS, explique qu’il est urgent d’en réduire massivement les surfaces cultivées. ➡️

👍3013👏2

24 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,070 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026

N'hésitez pas à rejoindre le canal de l'événement : https://t.me/cruebnm86

👍10🔥3

24 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC≈1,020 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @cruebnm86Photo

💥AVIS DE CRUE les 28, 29 et 30 août Alors que le 1er septembre approche, date à partir de laquelle les chantiers de bassines peuvent commencer, notre territoire continue de s'enfoncer dans une sécheresse historique. Parce que nous comptons bien vaincre les projets d'accaparement, continuons de nous organiser, de nous retrouver, de parler, de fêter, penser ensemble ! Une première CRUE en guise de dernier avertissemen

23🔥5👍3👎2

23 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC≈1,630 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026

[RELAI D'APPEL À SOLIDARITÉ AVEC LA COLOMBIE] Nous partageons cet appel à solidarité de notre camarade de lutte Juan Pablo Gutierrez, délégué international de l'ONIC Organización Nacional Indígena de Colombia (Organisation Nationale Indigène de Colombie) suite au séisme qui a frappé la Colombie et qui a plongé de nombreuses communautés, particulièrement les peuples autochtones du sud-ouest du pays, dans une situatio

👍218

21 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC≈1,340 views57 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🔴 Sainte-Soline : Madame Barbut, serez-vous la ministre de la Transition écologique qui sacrifiera l’Outarde canepetière pour sauver une bassine illégale ? Le Conseil national de la protection de la nature (CNPN) vient de rendre un nouvel avis défavorable à la dérogation « espèces protégées » demandée pour quatre des seize bassines du projet de la Sèvre niortaise et du Mignon, dont celle de Sainte-Soline. En effet,

👍38🔥133😱3

20 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC≈1,540 views75 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Les caméras piétons des gendarmes à Sainte-Soline font de nouveau parler d'elles, c'est l'occasion de poser de nouveau nos questions à Gerald Darmanin et la préfète Dubée qui ont directement piloté cette opération de maintien de l'ordre et donné les éléments de langage pour légitimer le déferlement de violence policière 1/2

🤬36👍18🔥123😢3😱3

20 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC≈1,430 views45 reactionsread 28 August 2026

- M. Darmanin a-t-il ordonné ou donné le feu vert à des tirs tendus dans au moins 9 des 15 escadrons présents sur place ? - Si non, quid de la préfète ? - Où sont les caméras manquantes des 3 autres escadrons ? - Pourquoi n’avoir informé personne de la mise en place d’une zone d’exclusion ? - Où est le compte-rendu de la préfecture sur ce dispositif ? - Pourquoi ont-ils interdit aux secours de se rendre sur place ? -

25👍11👏8😱1

17 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC≈2,620 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

💥 Le programme de la CRUE Voici le programme de la première CRUE de Bassines Non Merci 86 ! 📍Les informations précises d'accès au camp seront dévoilées rapidement Pour tout savoir sur l'événement, rejoignez le canal : Télégram : t.me/cruebnm86 Instagram : @bassinesnonmerci86 À très vite, BM86 et le Collectif Citoyen Sud-Vienne

👍25🔥73🥰3

15 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC≈5,500 views49 reactionsread 28 August 2026

[À LIRE EN INTÉGRALITÉ !] Rendements en chute libre, évaporation record… Le bilan des méga-bassines de l’été 2026, avec des exclusivité Bon Pote : https://bonpote.com/mega-bassines-secheresse-ete-2026/ *** [EXTRAIT] « Ce n’est pas une surprise pour l’hydroclimatologue Florence Habets qui rappelle pour Bon Pote un point important : l’évaporation énorme dans ces réserves : « On a du mal à faire comprendre à quel p

👍3217

14 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC≈5,060 views58 reactionsread 28 August 2026

En effet, cette mégabassine se vide actuellement uniquement par évaporation, la justice ayant interdit les prélèvements et remplissages jusqu'à nouvel ordre (Pour rappel : le jugement de la CAA du 18/12/2024 : https://bordeaux.cour-administrative-appel.fr/decisions-de-justice/dernieres-decisions/contentieux-des-bassines-dans-le-bassin-de-la-sevre-niortaise-mignon-quatre-reserves-dont-celle-de-sainte-soline-sont-illeg

🔥31🤬20👍52

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @STOPmegabassines. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@STOPmegabassines edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 103,337 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bassines Non Merci | Canal d'infos sur la luttes contre les mégabassines” (@STOPmegabassines), 8,906 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/STOPmegabassines.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.