Posted without readable text

Channel
SP Updates
@SP_Updates
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Cite this entry
7,072subscribers
+1,079 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003426681062 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SP_Updates |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SP_Updates |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:50 | 7,072 | +63 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 7,009 | +18 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 6,991 | +78 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:37 | 6,913 | +38 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:19 | 6,875 | +28 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 6,847 | +17 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 08:06 | 6,830 | +21 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 10:07 | 6,809 | +50 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 03:58 | 6,759 | +75 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 6,684 | +90 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 6,594 | -10 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 6,604 | +32 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 6,572 | +80 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 6,492 | +120 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:53 | 6,372 | +41 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 6,331 | +96 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 6,235 | +129 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 6,106 | +82 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 6,024 | +21 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 6,003 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.7%
- avg views ÷ 7,072 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 898
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.088%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (27 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,695 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 13:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 57.9% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Almost everything is getting hacked from *Universities* to *Railway* These 24 hours has been a *disaster* so far cause of some *unrestricted* AI Models
❤1
Posted without readable text
Restarting is finished ✅
Bot is restarting please wait...
❤1
Who are you ?
- Student63%
- Researcher10%
- Teacher7%
- Artist5%
- A random guy from the internet with hobby of reading16%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
If you find any issue then don't hesitate to inform me
Bot is restarting again, if you find any issue after the restart do inform me
❤1
Successful restarted ✅
Bot is restarting soon
🟢 BOT IS WORKING AGAIN After some inspection it turned out to be a small human error. The bot now online again, accepting requests Thank you for waiting
Support us by watching ads :)
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @SP_Updates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @SP_Updates as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 10 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 12 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 3 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Who are you ?
- Student63%
- Researcher10%
- Teacher7%
- Artist5%
- A random guy from the internet with hobby of reading16%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
I’m planning to add ads to the bot to unlock more features. Which of these would you be most interested in?
- 💾 Higher file size32%
- ⏳ Less cooldown27%
- 💳 More credits38%
- 🤔 Something else (tell me in messages)3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you read Pratilipi Stories? (in Hindi 🇮🇳)
- Yes14%
- No29%
- Yes but not hindi14%
- What's that ?43%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SP Updates” (@SP_Updates), 7,072 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SP_Updates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.